Laboratory on Geoinformatics and Cartography

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSPIRE Drafting Team „Data Specifications“
Advertisements

Proposed update of Technical Guidance for INSPIRE Download services based on SOS Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke, 52°North.
FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.
CEN/TC 287 general presentation 1 CEN/TC 287 Standardization of Geographic information general presentation Annet van der Horn secretary CEN/TC 287 Arnold.
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.
Geospatial standards Beyond FGDC Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 3, 2006.
1 TECO-WIS, 6-8 November 2006 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE WMO INFORMATION SYSTEM Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6-8 November 2006 ISO 191xx series of geographic.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
Oy Metadata Content j of Metadata. Discovery Access Understanding Levels of Metadata joy of Metadata Metadata Standards Why standards Which standards.
EuroGeographics Workshop Network Service, Paris, /06 Download services Olaf Østensen Network Services Drafting Team.
AIXM 5.1 Seminar 12 – 13 December 2011
ALKIS-ATKIS modelling using ISO standards Workshop “Standards in action” – Lisbon – Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Trierer.
Cover Environment and Natural Resources Service Sustainable Development Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the.
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
The elements of the MEDIN discovery standard Becky Seeley, DASSH & MEDIN helpdesk.
WP3 Interoperable datasets for nature conservation María Cabello Tracasa.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
INSPIRE drafting teams work versus practical INSPIRE implementations, theory and practice Marek Brylski, Intergraph Polska Enviro-i-Fórum – Zvolen – Slovakia.
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards ISO & Status Liping Di Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology.
1 Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services Data quality and Metadata: what is needed, what is feasible, next steps Interoperability of Spatial.
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Validation methodology.
AIXM 5 Metadata. Requirements for AIXM Metadata AIXM Metadata Model Examples Requirements for AIXM Metadata AIXM Metadata Model Examples.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
TASK 3.2 NatureSDI+ metadata profiles : Final version Dorian Ginane IRD - ESPACE.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation OGC Aviation DWG - Bonn Hubert LEPORI EUROCONTROL – DSR/CMN/IM 01-March-2011.
19-October th FIG Regional Conference, Hanoi Developing Vietnam’s Cadastral Data Standards based on ISO
Comparison of CEN, FGDC and ISO standards for metadata Ing. Jan Ruzicka Institute of Economics and Control Systems VŠB – Technical university Ostrava 17.
Econ-GI Frankfurt Book Fair 11-Oct-01 Econ-GI Economic Approaches Unlocking Geographic Information in the Public.
ESDI Workshop on Conceptual Schema Languages and Tools
Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Update of Discovery MS MD Schemas and Tools – MIWP-8 Tim Duffy, James.
NATURE-SDIplus Metadata Specification Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
Public Access and Spatial Metadata Values: Semantic Network Services Response to EU Directives Maria Rüther Federal Environment Agency,
Testing - an essential aspect of establishing an SDI Clemens Portele, Anders Östman, Michael Koutroumpas, Xin He, Janne Kovanen, Markus Schneider, Andriani.
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
Making the CDDA data model INSPIRE compliant Project information and status 2015 Eionet Biodiversity Ecosystems, Indicators and Assessments NRC Workshop.
A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Darja Lihteneger, November 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark INSPIRE Data Modelling for Reporting Data Flows – CDDA conceptual data model and INSPIRE Eionet.
Common Database on Designated Areas vs. INSPIRE Martin Tuchyňa, Darja Lihteneger INSPIRUJME SE, , Bratislava.
Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Mandatory Legend Identification Information Data Quality Information Spatial Data Organization Information.
Data Quality in INSPIRE Carol Agius Q-KEN, 5 – 7 May 2010, Brussels.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
Bavarian Agency for Surveying and Geoinformation AAA - The contribution of the AdV in an increasing European Spatial Data Infrastructure - the German Way.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
INSPIRE Conference 2011, Edinburgh Workshop “INSPIRE and open standards for sustainable growth“ Clemens Portele, interactive instruments GmbH Clemens Portele.
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
The Global Soil Information System
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
Application of Dublin Core and XML/RDF standards in the KIKERES
Indicator structure and common elements for information flow
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
NORTH CAROLINA state and local government METADATA PROFILE
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Data Validation Methods WFD GIS Working Group
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
The European Location Framework: taking INSPIRE to the next level
4th Meeting of the MIG-P, Brussels, June 2016
WG standards for data access/exchange
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
CDDA alignment with INSPIRE
Chapter 5.2 GIS Layers John Cima.
Chapter 5.5 Metadata John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

Laboratory on Geoinformatics and Cartography GS SOIL METADATA Christian Ansorge Umweltbundesamt Tomáš Řezník Masaryk University Laboratory on Geoinformatics and Cartography

Aspects of soil metadata Review on WP3 actions in 2010 Soil metadata profile Recent WP3 actions Best practice guidelines

Soil metadata profile SOIL PROFILE INSPIRE ISO CORE Mandatory

WP connections for the metadata D3.1 & D3.2 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7

Review on WP3 actions in 2010 Development of soil metadata profile Deliverable 3.1 INSPIRE compatible metadata profile for soil geographic datasets and dataset series Deliverable 3.2 INSPIRE compatible metadata profile for soil geographic data services Deliverable 3.3 Preliminary best Practice Guidelines for creating and maintaining metadata for soil database

Purpose of D3.1 and 3.2 documents Primary requirement – INSPIRE compliant metadata profiles – therefore Commission Regulation No. 1205/2008 (including Corrigenda 1) and their Technical Guidelines as well as Commission Regulation No 976/2009 as basic stones. Therefore inspired by: drafts of INSPIRE Annex I data specifications (especially TN, HY, PS) INSPIRE methodologies (generic conceptual model, data specification development) ISO, OGC and W3C standards to properly express soil-specific issues within their standardization framework

INSPIRE metadata (Commission Regulation No 1205/2008) Resource type Key word Resource abstract Unique Resource Identifier Resource title Topic Category Geographic Bounding Box Temporal Reference Lineage Conformity Conditions applying to access and use Limitations on public access Responsible party … Example of the printed map Sheet Freiburg-North (map representation acc. to the German topographic map 1:200.000)

Aspects of the Soil metadata profiles Two metadata profiles: for datasets and dataset series for services Compliant to the Commission Regulation No. 1205/2008 Added soil theme-specific metadata elements Well-described structure according to the ISO 19100 series standards Within ISO 19115 framework Examples of the XML encoding Registered as the INSPIRE Reference Material

Added soil theme-specific metadata – – mandatory and conditional elements Coordinate Reference System [1] Encoding [1..*] Character Encoding [0..*] Source title [0..1] Source date of mapping [0..*] Spatial Representation Type [0..*] Online digital transfer options [0..1] Topology level [0..*] Source mapping scale [0..1] Completeness – Ommission [0..*] Positional Accuracy – Absolute or external accuracy [0..*] Thematic Accuracy – Classification Correctness – Misclassification rate [0..*] Contains operations [0..*] Service version [0..*]

Recent WP3 actions Development of soil metadata best practice guidelines Deliverable 3.4 Final best Practice Guidelines for creating and maintaining metadata for soil database

Best practice Best practice in general Generally accepted Informally standardized techniques methods or processes that have proven themselves over time to accomplish given tasks maintain quality an extension or alternative to mandatory legislated standards

Purpose of D3.4 documents Soil data provider are unfamiliar with SDI Support and guide soil data providers to fulfill their obligations regarding the INSPIRE directive Ensure a common understanding and a high quality of metadata and their specific elements Therefore INSPIREd by: INSPIRE Metadata Implementing Rules: Technical Guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119 INSPIRE methodologies (generic conceptual model, data specification development)

GS Soil metadata profiles D 3.4 Best Practice Guidelines for creating and maintaining metadata for soil database Cook-book for metadata Definition of metadata profiles For dataset and dataset series For spatial data services Including examples on conceptual (table) and implementation (XML source-code) levels Data quality measures and recommendations Thesaurus information (very brief, link to D 3.5) Multilinguality issues Related SDI aspects (feature catalogue, catalogue services, metadata connections from different levels)

Changes in metadata profile Changes with respects to INSPIRE development Technical guidelines on INSPIRE metadata v1.2 Commission Regulation No 1089/2010 Commission Regulation No 976/2009 Technical Guidelines to INSPIRE Discovery services Added Coordinate reference system, Encoding, … Changes of GS Soil consortium opinions: Added File identifier Added Geometric object type metadata elements

Example of metadata element structure Metadata element name Resource locator Definition Location (address) for on-line access using a Uniform Resource Locator address or similar addressing scheme. ISO 19115 number and name 397. linkage INSPIRE obligation / condition Mandatory if a URL is available to obtain more information on the resources and/or access related services. INSPIRE multiplicity 0..* Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) URL Domain URL (IETF RFC1738 and IETF RFC 2056) Implementing guidelines Specify Resource locator in all possible ways according to the following guidelines - see [19] and [29]: If View and/or Download service is available for accessing the resource, specify link to the View and/or Download service and to the View and/or Download service metadata. See section 10.4 for forther information. If direct link to the resource is available, specify it. Otherwise specify link to a contact point where more information about the resource is available. Example http://www.afbini.gov.uk/index/services/services-specialist-advice/soils-environment.htm Example XML encoding <gmd:MD_Metadata … … <gmd:distributionInfo> <gmd:MD_Distribution> <gmd:transferOptions> <gmd:MD_DigitalTransferOptions> <gmd:onLine> <gmd:CI_OnlineResource> <gmd:linkage> <gmd:URL>http://www.afbini.gov.uk/index/services/services-specialist-advice/soils-environment.htm</gmd:URL> </gmd:linkage> </gmd:CI_OnlineResource> </gmd:onLine> </gmd:MD_DigitalTransferOptions> </gmd:transferOptions> </gmd:MD_Distribution> </gmd:distributionInfo> </gmd:MD_Metadata>

Multilinguality issues <gmd:identificationInfo> <gmd:MD_DataIdentification> <gmd:citation> <gmd:CI_Citation> <gmd:title xsi:type="gmd:PT_FreeText_PropertyType"> <gco:CharacterString>Agregovaná půdní mapa</gco:CharacterString> <gmd:PT_FreeText> <gmd:textGroup> <gmd:LocalisedCharacterString locale="#locale-en">Aggregated soil map</gmd:LocalisedCharacterString> </gmd:textGroup> <gmd:LocalisedCharacterString locale="#locale-de">Aggregierte Bodenkarte</gmd:LocalisedCharacterString> <gmd:LocalisedCharacterString locale="#locale-el">Συνολικός Εδαφολογικός Χάρτης</gmd:LocalisedCharacterString> </gmd:PT_FreeText> </gmd:title> .. </gmd:CI_Citation> </gmd:citation> </gmd:MD_DataIdentification> </gmd:identificationInfo>

Best practice and beyond D3.4 were developed for and with soil data providers Specific requirements as important part of metadata profile and best practice document Benefits for data provider Best practice document shall lead support them in fulfilling their INSPIRE obligations Soil specific requirements are considered Tools for creating and managing metadata were developed and provided to the data providers Benefits for INSPIRE and SDI Metadata will be available in time High quality of data is ensured through a common understanding of metadata and data

Special thanks to Tomáš Řezník Looking forward talking What is next? Special thanks to Tomáš Řezník Looking forward talking with you about our soil metadata profile Modified from http://urbanext.illinois.edu