Discharge in Descending Order

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Table 1. The analytical and physical data for the complexes

Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

35 mm equivalent focal length (mm)

Table 1. Structural Form Parameter Estimates of inflation rate

Total Number of persons Tested

Tensile Strength (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Susceptibility Coefficient

(1) Common Pb corrected using measured 204Pb.

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Author(s) and Published Year

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Table 1. Summary Statistics of Top Cut 1-m Samples

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Air-water flow cases

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Financial Development

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Table 1. Measurements of LEDs

t-test for Equality of Means

Table 1. Analytical data of water samples

Cumulative Percentage

Cumulative Percentage

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Table 2. Derived parameters of water samples

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 4. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Managers level

Table 2. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at Non-Executive level

Table 6. Twisting moment of counter shaft at different torques

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4

Presentation transcript:

Discharge in Descending Order Table 2.8. Return period using Weibull Formula Discharge (Cummecs) Discharge in Descending Order Rank (m) P = m/(n+1) Probability (%) Return period (1/p) 17713 30676 1 0.041 4.17 24.39 19914 23491 2 0.082 8.17 12.25 15548 23090 3 0.125 12.50 8.00 21272 4 0.180 17.96 5.56 20534 5 0.232 23.22 4.31 18225 20426 6 0.280 28.00 3.57 18885 19941 7 0.334 33.43 2.99 17012 8 0.383 38.25 2.61 19025 19389 9 0.441 44.14 2.26 16098 10 0.499 49.94 2.00 13792 11 0.553 55.32 1.81 12 0.624 62.42 1.60 13 0.695 69.47 1.44 17512 14 0.777 77.73 1.29 17139 15 0.827 82.69 1.21 16 0.888 88.83 1.12 17 0.934 93.40 1.07 18 0.962 96.20 1.61 11468 19 0.984 98.40 1.02 20 0.995 99.50 1.00 ONUIGBO I.C. et al. Flood Vulnerability Mapping of Lokoja Metropolis Using Geographical Information System Techniques. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 5, 229-242. doi:10.12691/jgg-5-5-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.