© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

before and after rehabilitation

Table 2. Correlation matrix for variables in this study

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Structural Form Parameter Estimates of inflation rate

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Regression Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Demographic data from participants

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

Variables Coefficient Prob.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Direct Effects for the Dyadic Model

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Rating of Water Quality

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Factor Analysis of ISQ Dimension

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 3. Main properties of the thin brass electrode

Order cycle in which item n has to be sent

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Surface roughness (outer faces)

Cumulative Percentage

Control Valve Tag Number

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

reported practices score pre/post intervention

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

Table 3. Surface roughness (inner faces)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 4. Correlation coefficients between the BAS and its two subscales with related variables Scale BMI Optimism PACS-R IARS Age T.V. 13-item BAS -.306** .334** -.485** -.205** .082 -.065 10-item subscale -.330** .358** -.456** -.175* .073 -.063 3-item subscale -.058 .116 -.329** -.197** .085 -.049 ** P<0.01 * P<0.05. Mohammad Atari et al. The Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Body Appreciation Scale. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 3, 62-66. doi:10.12691/ajap-3-3-3 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.