Elementary Facilitators of School Improvement February 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Advertisements

Facilitators of District Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer November 2013.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
1. The Process Rubrics (40 or 90) should be open soon. 2. The Data Profile and SI Plan are expected to open in December. 3. The complete CNA will.
District Continuous Improvement Team December 10, 2013.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Facilitators of School Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer October 2013.
Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement
School Data Analysis Diagnostic Using MISchoolData and ASSIST Jennifer Parker-Moore, Ed.D. Lisa Guzzardo Asaro, Ed.S. Kristina Martin Macomb ISD Paul Bielawski.
Steps 2 & 3 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Walk Through Steps 2 & 3 Username & passwords Team Requirements Scheduled FET Trainings & Completion.
Overview of School Improvement Process
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Facilitators of School Improvement All Cohorts Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer April 2015.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Building Your Data Notebook for School Improvement PURPOSE: In compliance with state mandate, local “Data Diggers” will collect data into a single source.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
FSI Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard OCTOBER 2012.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
FSI Level IV Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Lisa Rivard FEBRUARY 2012.
Facilitators of School Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer October 2014.
One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
One Common Voice One Plan March 31, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Study Stage Analyze Data.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Hudson Area Schools - Lincoln Elementary School Improvement Professional Development Friday, February 26, 2010.
Facilitators of School Improvement ELEMENTARY LISA GUZZARDO ASARO DEANE SPENCER OCTOBER 2015.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
When Literacy, RTI and Continuous School Improvement Work in Concert Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Dr. Maureen Staskowski Carrie Wozniak June.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Overview.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
SECONDARY FACILITATORS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT FEBRUARY 2016 LISA GUZZARDO ASARO DEANE SPENCER.
FACILITATORS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT APRIL 2016 Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer.
Sustaining School Reform A guide to support evaluation policy
Annual Evaluation (TFI 1.15 )
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Data & Technology Updates April, 2016
SIP Cycle and Supports Overview
Facilitators of School Improvement
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Welcome and Announcements
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
ELA Teacher Leader Network Meeting March 29, 2012
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Assessments to Support Student Learning:
Parent Dashboard for School Transparency
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Continuous Improvement Diagnostic Due September 24, 2018
Building Your Title I Schoolwide Plan
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parental Involvement
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Parent Discussion Meeting
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Elementary Facilitators of School Improvement February 2016 Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane spencer

***YOU WILL NEED YOUR MiSchoolData LOGIN!!*** Today’s Outcomes Experience Cutting Edge Math presentation from MISD Math Consultants Receive Important Updates Engage in the Program Evaluation Tool Connect your Diagnostics to Tasks Experience a Data Dig that you can take back to your School ***YOU WILL NEED YOUR MiSchoolData LOGIN!!***

Key Working Agreements A Facilitation Tool Respect all Points of View Be Present and Engaged Honor Time Agreements Get All Voices in the Room These breathe life into our Core Values

Parking Lot A Facilitation Tool Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

Action Required Chart Any request by you that I need to respond to must be placed on the Action Required Chart You need to PRINT your complete name, school, and email address

Math is in the House Math Consultants: Trish Dunn Kristi Hineman   Math Consultants: Trish Dunn Kristi Hineman Marianne Srock

Division of Accountability Services (DAS) Assessment and Accountability  http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-22709---,00.html Sign up to receive

Adding Content & Tabs to M-STEP Binder ELA ELA Claims-Targets-Standards ELA Claims-Targets-Standards Crosswalk MATH Math Claims and Assessment Targets Math Claims Math Claim 2, 3, &4 Relevant Verbs

DAS Guide To state assessment scavenger hunt K-2 Testing 9th grade testing Testing sequencing

AdvancEd Michigan will launch the new face of ASSIST AdvancEd Michigan will launch the new face of ASSIST. It will be a split screen. The standard ASSIST screen will appear on the left. Those voluntarily choosing to use the eleot or surveys can enter eProve through the right side of the screen. Your same one password, gets you into ASSIST but the screen will now be split. NEW FACE

Update on availability Number of surveys available The two modules you will have access to are eleot and surveys. These are completely voluntary. The surveys without customizable features are in the ASSIST platform and the customizable survey functionality is in the new eProve platform.

Develop School Improvement Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan Plan Develop School Improvement Plan Focus The final step in the Do stage is to evaluate the plan, or to assess its effectiveness.

Program Evaluation Tool DUE DATE in ASSIST: 06.30.16 This is the language pulled directly from the Program Evaluation Tool for Questions 5.

Program Evaluation Tool (PET) October Complete the What You Learned/Action Steps Matrix Activity (DONE) Decide to use the same strategy/program/initiative or identify another (DONE) January Create a NEW Program Evaluation Tool Diagnostic in ASSIST or work off the word TEMPLATE and Copy and Paste Later Use the PET Criteria pages to help you reflect/dialogue and complete Description page 1 (DONE) Queston 1. Readiness pages 2-4 (DONE) February Use the PET Criteria pages to help you reflect/dialogue and complete these PET parts Today: Question 2. Knowledge and Skills Question 3. Opportunity to Implement March Use the PET Criteria pages to help you reflect/dialogue and complete question 4 Question 4. Fidelity of implementation MISD FSI Timeline for Guided PET Professional Learning

DONE Program Evaluation Tool January – February Work Complete Readiness Complete Knowledge and Skills Complete Opportunity This is the language for PET, Getting Reading questions 1-3: Readiness, Knowledge & Skills, and Opportunity to Implement pulled directly from the PET DONE

Guided PET Activity Pamphlet for school-wide input. Handout Guided PET Activity Pamphlet for school-wide input. This explains the purpose of the PET Pamphlet: This PET Pamphlet activity provides an opportunity for schools/teams to address each PET question parts to facilitate a dialogue sot the staff can identify what evidence of practice they have or what action steps are still needed to improve implementation. The TIPS written in blue type, are directly taken from the Review Criteria document provided by MDE to delineate exactly what MDE is looking for in a response.

2. Getting Ready: Knowledge and skill Handout Using the pamphlet, begins with Questions 2: Knowledge and Skills and invite participants to work in school teams reviewing the question parts, the TIPS, and the review criteria to identify the evidence of practice THAT IS IN PLACE, then add what action steps are needed to improve for those question parts where there are no evidence of practice.

3. Getting Ready: Opportunity for high quality implementation Handout 3. Getting Ready: Opportunity for high quality implementation Using the pamphlet, begin with Question 3: Opportunity to Implement and invite participants to work in school teams reviewing the question parts, the TIPs, and the review criteria to identify the evidence of practice THAT IS IN PLACE, then add what action steps are needed to improve for those question parts where there are no evidence of practice.

Program Evaluation Tool March Work Complete Implementation with Fidelity

Handout 4. Implementation with Fidelity: Was the Strategy/program/initiative being implemented as intended? Using the pamphlet, begin with Question 4: Implementation with Fidelity and invite participants to work in school teams reviewing the question parts, the TIPs, and the review criteria to identify the evidence of practice THAT IS IN PLACE, then add what action steps are needed to improve for those question parts where there are no evidence of practice.

Monitoring Plan Examples (October Handout) Sample Present the examples shared in October to FSI participants in column three: HOW and What Monitoring Mechanism?

(Student Achievement) (Adult Implementation) Program Evaluation Requires all THREE types of Activities Handout Measurement (Student Achievement) Data Fidelity of Implementation Current Reality (Statements & Rubric Score) Data Walk Through (Adult Implementation) Data and then One Two Three This slide illustrates what THREE components that are needed to understand the ‘impact’ and ‘fidelity of implementation’ when conducting Program Evaluation. Staff engage in Circle One and Circle Two activities in May. Circle One: The Fidelity of Implementation, Current Reality activity provides a voice for those stakeholders implementing said strategy/program/initiative to provide current reality input regarding their implementation. Circle Two: Analysis of Walk Through Data results is used from throughout the year. It is at this time, that schools can begin to tie the Circle One and Two data to Circle Three impact data. Last, schools look at end-of-the year data for improvement, decline, or static results. Ready to Answer PET Question 5 in May 25

2015-16 Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Starting, Attaching and Submitting Handout

Stage Two Study Step 4 Analyze Data (4 data points) Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Study Research Focus

What What Data Do YOU Collect? Demographic Data Achievement/ Outcome Data Process Data Perception Data Enrollment Subgroups of students Staff Attendance (Students and Staff) Mobility Graduation and Dropout Conference attendance Education status Student subgroups Parent involvement Teaching staff Course enrollment patterns Discipline referrals Suspension rates Alcohol‐tobacco‐drug violations Extracurricular participation Physical, mental, social and health Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards State assessments: MME, SAT M-STEP, MI-Access, ELPA National assessments: SAT, PSAT8/9, PSAT10 WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT GPA Dropout rates College acceptance Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline) Academic and behavior expectations Parent participation: PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers Suspension data School Process Indicators (SSR 26 Indicators) or (ISA/SA) Event occurred: Who, what, when, where, why, how What you did for whom: E.g. All 8th graders received violence prevention Survey data (student, parent, staff, community) Opinions (Clarify what others think. People act based on what they believe. How do they see you/us?) Deb Overview of four main types of data for reference for schools when working through the SDA Reference worksheet on back of form. Talk about the other questions in the worksheet and why they are important. Form may be useful for work back in the district. Laura make copies of both slides 12 and 13 - back to back What 10/10/2014 What Data Do YOU Collect? Office of Education Improvement & Innovation www.mi.gov/osi

School Process Profile Due Date: March 18, 2016 &Perception Data 26 Quality Indicators MDE Accredited Interim Self- Assessment Self- Assessment AdvancED Michigan When you involve your staff, you are getting at schoolwide perception data.

One or the Other…. NOT BOTH AdvancED ISA MDE SSR Revisit Review Recalibrate Revisit Review Recalibrate Two platforms: AdvancED Michigan and MDE One or the Other…. NOT BOTH

MDE: School Systems Review (SSR) AdvancED: Interim Self Assessment (ISA) TASKS: 1) Complete either the School Systems Review, Interim Self Assessment or Self Assessment 2) Use your completed ed Yes! report To record your strengths and challenges in your data planner 3) Determine impacts and actions associated with each Team Time

attach your Diagnostic You can attach the 2014 Ed YES! diagnostic by….. CLICK Under Components, click on the 2015 Ed YES! diagnostic and label the diagnostic 2016 Ed YES! Report. Make any and all changes based on current information, data and results. Complete slide once the tasks assigned in ASSIST CLICK

MDE Memorandum Streamline School Improvement PLANS Handout

MDE Memorandum Accountability and Accreditation School/district reporting requirements Handout

Stage Two Study Step 4 Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Study Research Focus

Handout Update Your Plan! Continue to update and examine your current Data Plan. As you complete the table, consider where you have deficits and where you have strengths.

Collect and Compare your Data Use your ‘Data Planner’ and your ‘Data Worksheet’ to collect data to inform your plan Data Planner and Data Worksheet. Capture data requirements from School Data Analysis. Update Data Worksheet with information from your completed EdYes! report

Update your Data Worksheet with results AS YOU GATHER THEM Edyes Update your Data Worksheet with results AS YOU GATHER THEM Edyes!, surveys, demographic data Update Data Worksheet with information from your completed EdYes! report

Collect Data GATHER STUDY Analyze Data Get Ready Collect Data Build Profile STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice Presenter: Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore MISchooldata.org Data Director Handouts

Team Work Time Network with colleagues Plan what to bring back to share with SI team ATTACH ED Yes! Report TO task and update Attach Program Evaluation TooL (PET) to task Work to complete PET: Knowledge & skills, Implementation gather and record Data Begin revisit, review, and revise SIP diagnostics