Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13 th Airway Management Course 14 th March 2011 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
Advertisements

Airway Management Course 20 th February 2008 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
THINKINGACTIVELY In a SOCIAL CONTEXT Year 4 History The Tudors.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September 2010 Mean score, maximum being 5.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Nov 25 th -26 th 2013.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation May Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs.
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 9-10 January 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 38 1: very poor.
2008 Faculty of Medicine Curriculum Retreat Teaching Tips: What has proven to be effective pedagogic techniques for myself? Sally Chan Professor, The Nethersole.
Tips for Music Teachers. Establish Rules & Routines ▪ Develop classroom rules consistent with school rules and which administrators will support. - rules.
Workshop on Peer Instruction: Setting Yourself up for Success Beth Simon Computer Science and Engineering University of California, San Diego Formerly,
Dr. Brad Harrington, ©2009 MB 110: Human Resource Management Course Evaluations Prof. Brad Harrington Boston College.
Using Qualtrics for Midterm Course Evaluations Heather Urry Psychology.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
The 5-Paragraph Essay.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 9 th and 10 th June 2009.
Clare Saunders and Danielle Lamb Subject Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:22 1: very poor 2:
Mental Health First Aid Wales Comments from course participants Over 13,000 people throughout Wales have been trained so far. 1.
Undergraduate Students’ Perception of an Online Course in Music Appreciation Herschel V. Beazley Professor of Music (Retired) and Governor’s Teaching Fellow.
Dr. Brad Harrington, ©2008 MB 110: Human Resource Management Course Evaluations 2008 Prof. Brad Harrington Boston College.
14 th Airway Management Course 11 th October 2011 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 11 th and 12 th June 2009.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation Course 1 : June 1 st – 2 nd 2015.
Airway Management Course 11 th March 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back.
For many beginning teachers thinking about teaching means For many beginning teachers thinking about teaching means thinking about how to execute a captivating.
Y axis represents number of candidates Airway Management Course For ODPs: 28 th March 2012 Course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:
Why Teach Weather? Weather images removed for copyright reasons.
Support for Learning with Technologies Mel Philipson.
Patrik Hultberg Kalamazoo College
Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course Evaluation Feb Mean score represented on bar charts 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
1 Welcome to the Team : Tutor and Demonstrator Development Program Faculties of Science.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2010 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 36 1: very poor 2:
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation May 2010 Mean score, maximum being 5.
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation November 2009.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 26&27 April 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 37 1: very poor 2:
National 5 AVU Learning Intentions: To gain knowledge on how to present information, form a conclusion and make a research sheet.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 6-7 January 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:30 1: very poor 2:
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation 25 th and 26 th November 2009.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: April 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:28 1: very poor 2:
Final FRCA VIVA Course Evaluation June 2012.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: December 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 29 1: very poor.
Teachmeet, January 2016 Debates and peer-peer feedback to increase student engagement Dr. Claire V.S. Pike.
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation 17 th & 18 th June 2013.
Active Learning in the Third Year Statistical Physics Module at the University of the Witwatersrand Jonathan Keartland School of Physics, University of.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: December 2009 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates:30 1: very poor.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: September 2010 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 33 1: very poor.
Y axis represents number of candidates OSCE/VIVA course: 5-6 January 2012 course evaluation and candidate feed back Total candidates: 34 1: very poor 2:
Do you feel there should be a prerequisite for this module concerning the knowledge level? The result of evaluation forms.
Module name & code Evaluation survey. How to use Zappers A 60-second training course. You will be using the handsets to give your feedback on the module.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PREPARING.
Responsibilities CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing
y axis represents number of candidates
Responsibilities CS 4640 Programming Languages for Web Applications
Credit Risk Skills Workshop Training Evaluation Report
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation
Formative assessment to increase student confidence and attainment
Knowtulus Technologies Pvt.Ltd
y axis represents number of candidates
Primary FRCA MCQ course evaluation February 2015
Final FRCA SAQ/MCQ Course Evaluation
Final FRCA SOE Course Evaluation
Royal Leader Quiz Essay
Incorporating Active Learning in Foundational Courses
Friday 6 March 2015 etc. Venues Prospero House Conference Evaluation
Teaching Listening Based on Active Learning.
Responsibilities CS 4640 Programming Languages for Web Applications
CS 1111 Introduction to Programming Spring 2019
Title of Program segment
Presentation transcript:

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation January 2012

Mean score, maximum being 5 Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs. Total no. candidates:34 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day1 :23rd January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 2 :24th January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Day 3: 25th January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

Overall value of the course 1= waste of money/time, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation

Value of pre-course MCQ Practice 1= very poor, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

Comments: Pharmacology Very clear and good introduction Clear and concise, good slides Well presented, answered questions well, Very clear, good explanation Good slides - good explanations of answers - concise Very knowledgeable Excellent Very good! Explained every answers whether T or F

Comments: Physics Good slides, well presented Excellent, should have been in the morning when we are fresh Extremely useful Very informative, knew topic very well. Clarified ambiguities I had Well explained Good to have SBA practice Good All well presented, answered questions appropriately

Comments: Physiology Much better day. Good speaker - all clear and a sense of humor! Good explanation of answers. Excellent, clear and concise and enjoyable! Answered questions, very knowledgeable Very approachable, clear answers to questions asked Excellent Thank you! The presentation was very clear, easy to understand and follow

Mean score, maximum being 5 Comments:General Lecture handouts are something that I feel really lacked, in order to help keep up the material. Turning point SBA devices were great fun, interactive and helpful. Very well organised with a lot of effort put in to organise the course. High quality teaching, very informed lecturers.. Mean score, maximum being 5

Mean score, maximum being 5 Comments:General Practice papers very useful, questions very challenging Good length (3 days) Dr xx has written good SBA's in preparation for exam, majority topics covered would like more cardiovascular and respiratory physiology questions. Mean score, maximum being 5

Post exam feedback Thanks for all your support during and after the course pharmacology MCQs were a little challenging Many MCQ's and SBA's were totally new Thanks for all the help for my preparation SBA questions were tough. Coventry classes were useful. Thank you for the encouragement. Yes it went well today