Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
NCLB Assessment and Accountability Provisions: Issues for English-language Learners Diane August Center for Applied Linguistics.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
AYP and Report Card.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2011

What do you know about AYP? Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov What do you know about AYP? #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov #

Adequate Yearly Progress Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Adequate Yearly Progress Each state established a definition of adequate yearly progress (AYP) Definition is used to measure the achievement of schools, districts, and states over time No Child Left Behind strengthens the accountability provisions. Definition of AYP will measure the progress of every school AYP definition will be built on two foundational elements: * challenging academic content standards, * valid and reliable assessments that fully cover the breadth and depth of those standards – in other words, the states will use their accountability systems to measure how well their students are learning core content. This definition of AYP also has an element of increasing expectations. The states have done a tremendous amount of work over the past years. At this point, 20 states fully comply with the 1994 law and the rest are on specific plans for getting there within the next few years. Yet, in moving forward, there is much work to be done. #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov All campuses, districts, and states are evaluated for Adequate Yearly Progress. Only campuses and districts that receive Title I, Part A federal funds are subject to school improvement activities and corrective actions if they fail to meet AYP for two or more consecutive years as defined by the State Accountability Workbook. #

Accountability Measures Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Accountability Measures The goal is 100 percent proficiency for all students in 12 years. Provides measurable objectives for all students and for specific student groups. A few specific elements to AYP. The ultimate goal is a system where every student is proficient. These expectations will increase at an even pace over time for the next twelve years. The system will measure not only the progress of entire schools, but will take a closer look at how well specific student subgroups are performing. These subgroups include students from major ethnic and racial groups, economically disadvantaged, students with disabilities and limited English proficient students. We are aware that these accountability measures are ambitious. We are even more aware of the schools and districts who have embraced such systems and ensured their students have learned at high levels. We know this can be done. #

Performance is evaluated for: Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Performance is evaluated for: 1. All students 2. African-American students 3. Hispanic students 4. White students 5. Economically disadvantaged students 6. Special education students 7. Limited English proficient students #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov NCLB required test data from the 2001-2002 school year to be used to set the baselines. The targets gradually increased. By 2013-2014, the targets are 100 percent proficiency for both reading/language arts and mathematics. #

Supplemental Educational Services AYP Performance Standards for 2002-03 – 2013-14 School Year 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Reading/ English Language Arts 47% 53% 60% 67% 73% 80% 87% 93% 100% Mathematics 33% 42% 50% 58% 75% 83% 92% www.nochildleftbehind.gov #

Criteria for meeting AYP: Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Criteria for meeting AYP: PLAN A 1. AYP performance requirements are met if the level of proficiency for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP targets. #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov 2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math. 3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools. #

AYP performance requirements can also be met if there is: Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov AYP performance requirements can also be met if there is: PLAN B 1. Sufficient decrease from the prior year in the percentage of students failing TAKS and 2. improvement is shown on the other performance measure (graduation rate for high schools, attendance for middle and elementary schools). #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov #

Options in No Child Left Behind Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Options in No Child Left Behind Parents of students in Title I schools in school improvement status will have the option to transfer to another public school in the district not in school improvement status. Parents of students in Title I schools identified for their 2nd year in school improvement status will be eligible to receive supplemental services for their children. There are two avenues for parental options: Public School Choice Supplemental Educational Services #

Supplemental Educational Services include: www.nochildleftbehind.gov Supplemental Educational Services include: Tutoring Remediation Academic intervention Instruction must take place outside the regular school day. With supplemental services – these services can be Tutoring Remeditiaton Academic intervention The key is that these services are in addition to – outside – the regular school day. #

Why Supplemental Services? Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Why Supplemental Services? To ensure that students increase their academic achievement, particularly in reading, language arts, and mathematics Why – to ensure that these students increase their academic achievement in reading, language arts, and mathematics. #

Who is an eligible child? Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Who is an eligible child? Children from low-income families attending Title I schools in school improvement status The child’s school must have failed to make AYP for three or more years Who are these students? Two criteria: 1) children from low-income families and 2) attending schools receiving Title I funds that are in their second year of school improvement, corrective action or restructuring status. #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov As schools improve and make AYP for two consecutive years, they are no longer required to provide these services. #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Schools in Need of Improvement http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/nclb/titleia/sip/2009-2010/sip.html #

Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov Reports and Guide: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2010/index.html

2009 AYP Accountability Manual Supplemental Educational Services www.nochildleftbehind.gov 2009 AYP Accountability Manual http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2010/guide/guide.pdf #