2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Disproportionate Impact and Identifying Factors that Impact Hispanic Student Completion Rates Unpacking the Student Success Scorecard Matthew.
Advertisements

California Community Colleges Student Success 2014 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard College of the Desert Board of Trustee Presentation Dec. 19, 2014.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
SBVC Student Equity Plan A Update and Historical Overview James E. Smith, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
San Luis Obispo Community College District Cuesta College Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes/Student Success Scorecard Report SLOCCCD Board of Trustees.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
SSTF Update: ARCC Score Card Phil Smith — ASCCC Leadership Development Committee Chair Craig Rutan — Santiago Canyon College.
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Accountability Reporting The “Scorecard” Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Student Equity in California Community Colleges Dr. Craig Hayward, Director Lisa Nguyen, Senior Research and Planning Analyst Irvine Valley College.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
CERRITOS COLLEGE I.E.P.I. REPORT (DUE JUNE 2015) STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT, MAY 8, 2015.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Board of Trustees Retreat December 9, 2015 Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants Success Indicators and Key College Profile Data 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat May 10, 2013 Dr. Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants.
Laney College Institutional Effectiveness Goal Indicators: Proposal for Adoption Draft Proposal June 13, 2016.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Student success scorecard from the 2017 year ending in
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
2014 College of the Sequoias Student Success Scorecard
Student Success Scorecard 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
Contra Costa Community College District
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
California Community Colleges Student Success Initiative Implementation Presentation for Association of California Community College Administrators &
Board of Trustees Review
What is our why? 10+1…and other numbers
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
What is our why? 10+1…and other numbers
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Environmental Scan Planning Retreat
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
Berkeley City College, Faculty, Administrators, and Staff
Student Success Metrics
Student Success Scorecard
Metrics Simplification Project
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
Disproportionate Impact Study
Student Success Initiative
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Highlights from the District-wide Annual Institutional
IBHE Proprietary Advisory Committee Institution Impact Report
Presentation transcript:

2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard Report to Board, Faculty, Staff, & Public June 8th 2016

--Background-- Assembly Bill 1417 and ARCC In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community Colleges (CCC). That legislation and ensuing budget action authorized the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) to design and implement a performance measurement system containing performance indicators for the system and its colleges. This comprehensive system was known as the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, or ARCC.   The Student Success Task Force (SSTF) recommended the implementation of a new California Community College accountability framework whose purpose is to provide stakeholders with clear and concise information on key student progress and success metrics in order to improve performance. The recommendation specified that a “scorecard” be built on the existing reporting system, the ARCC. To satisfy the request of the SSTF, the ARCC Advisory Workgroup, which guided the development of the initial accountability system in 2005, was reconvened. The workgroup was represented by individuals from various community college organizations and stakeholder groups, as well as researchers with technical expertise in performance measures. This technical workgroup reviewed the existing framework and designed the new Scorecard. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

--The Scorecard-- The Scorecard Components Part of the Scorecard focuses on the performance of each individual college in the system. The indicators of the Scorecard measure both intermediary progress and completion at each California Community College for five annual cohorts of students. The Scorecard metrics include: Persistence Rate Remedial Rates for Math, English, and ESL 30 Units Rate Career Technical Education (CTE) Rate Completion Rate Student Information (Demographics) These metrics are similar to but different from the metrics used in the previous ARCC Reports. The definition of each metric is given in the following sections where that metric is presented. Disaggregation of Scorecard Results The Scorecard results are broken down by (1) “entry” level (prepared or remedial), (2) gender, (3) age group, and (4) race. Selected results are presented here. The complete results are available from the Research Office. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

--Selected Results-- Persistence Rate (Overall, Prepared by Gender) Remedial Rate Math Remedial Rate (Overall, Overall by Gender) English Remedial Rate (Overall, Overall by Gender) ESL Remedial Rate (Overall) 30 Units Rate (Overall, Prepared by Race) Completion Rate Career Technical Education (CTE) Rate (Overall, Overall by Gender) Completion Rate (Overall, Prepared by Gender, Overall by Entry Level) Student Information (Demographics) 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Persistence Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The Overall Persistence Rate is the percentage of degree and/or transfer-seeking first-time students with at least six units who attempted any math or English course at Taft College in their first three years and subsequently enrolled in two additional consecutive primary terms anywhere in the system. This metric is considered a milestone or momentum point because research shows that students who complete their first three terms are more likely to complete a certificate or degree or to transfer. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Persistence Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 73.4% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Prepared Persistence Rate for Five Cohorts by Gender Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Math Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The Math Remedial Rate is defined as the percentage of credit students who started out at two or more levels below transfer level in math and, within six years, they successfully completed a math course at one level below transfer level or any transfer-level math course. The cohort is tracked from the time the student attempts a course at two or more levels below transfer level in math at Taft College. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Math Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 32.7% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Math Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts by Gender Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall English Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The English Remedial Rate is defined as the percentage of credit students who started out at any level below transfer in English and they successfully completed a transfer-level English course within six years. The cohort is tracked from the time the student attempts a course at any level below transfer in English at Taft College. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall English Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 45.4% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

English Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts by Gender Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall ESL Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The English as a Second Language (ESL) Remedial Rate is computed by taking the percentage of credit students who start out at any level in ESL and successfully completed the ESL sequence or a transfer-level English course within six years. The ESL students are tracked from the time the student attempts an ESL course at Taft College, that is, they may take an ESL course and in the same semester complete a transfer level English course. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall ESL Remedial Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall 30 Units Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The Overall 30 Units Rate is defined as the percentage of degree and/or transfer seeking first time Taft College students who achieve at least 30 units after six years in the system. This metric is also a milestone or momentum point. Research studies show that credit accumulation, specifically 30 units, is positively correlated with college completion and wage gain. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall 30 Units Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 67.6% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Prepared 30 Units Rate for Five Cohorts by Race Figure 73.2% 57.1% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall CTE Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The CTE Rate is defined as the percentage of students who completed at least eight units classified as career technical education (or vocational) in a single discipline and, within six years after taking the first course, completed a degree, certificate, or transfer related outcome (transferred to a 4-year institution or completed 60 transferable units with a GPA of 2.0 or higher). 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall CTE Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 51.4% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall CTE Rate for Five Cohorts by Gender Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Completion Rate for Five Cohorts Definition The Overall Completion Rate is defined as the percentage of first-time students with a minimum of six units earned who attempted any math or English course in the first three years and, within six years, earned a certificate, degree, or achieved a transfer related outcome (transferred to four-year university or earned 60 units with a GPA of 2.0 or higher). Completion rates are reported for the overall group. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Overall Completion Rate for Five Cohorts Figure 47.1% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Prepared Completion Rate for Five Cohorts by Gender Figure 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Completion Rate for Five Cohorts by Starting Level Figure 37.4% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

Student Information (2014-2015) Students 9,649 Gender % Female 31.0% Male 68.7% Unknown 0.3% Race/Ethnicity % African American 6.2% American Indian/ Alaskan Native 0.7% Asian 1.7% Filipino 1.1% Hispanic 55.9% Pacific Islander 0.3% White 31.6% Two or More 2.2% Unknown 0.4% Other Info FTES 2,532.4 Credit Sections 1,653 Non-Credit Sections 67 Median Credit Section Size 20 % of FT Faculty 62.7% Student Counseling Ratio 455:1 Age % Under 20 14.7% 20 to 24 26.7% 25 to 49 36.7% 50 + 21.9% Unknown 0.0% 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

--Summary and Recommendations-- The Scorecard metrics are useful, robust indicators of student success and can be used to improve student success. They do have one problem: they focus solely on 1st time, traditional students. The data presented in this report represent selected “snapshots” of the entire data set, which breaks down the metrics by “entry level” into college (remedial and prepared), gender, age, and race. Therefore, any recommendations and follow-up activities must take into account the complexity of the data. The 2014 ACCJC Standards require all colleges to develop “Institution-Set Standards” (ISS) and to implement activities designed to improve student success as measured by those standards. Taft College has identified several ISS measures (and Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative measures) in part based on these Scorecard measures: (1) Course Success Rates, (2) Student Retention Rates, (3) Student Persistence Rates, (4) Student Math and English Remedial Rates, and (5) Student Completion Rates. 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

A. Persistence Rates by Gender Taft College is developing and using Institution-Set Standards and IEPI goals that are aligned with the College’s mission by using locally derived data in conjunction with Chancellor’s Office (Scorecard) data, which do not fully capture what is happening. Various departments, the Student Success Committee, and the Student Access Committee are developing, implementing and monitoring interventions for improving student success as measured by the Scorecard, ISS and IEPI metrics. As shown in the data, the results have been mostly positive. Taft College should investigate, understand, and intervene as appropriate: A. Persistence Rates by Gender B. Math and English Remedial Rates by Gender C. CTE Rates by Gender D. Prepared Completion Rates by Race E. Prepared Completion Rates by Gender (Why did gap close?) F. Overall Completion Rates by Level: REMEDIAL STUDENTS! 2016 Student Success Scorecard Taft College Institutional Research

2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard Report to Board, Faculty, Staff, & Public June 8th 2016