HV-MAPS Designs and Results I

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ATLAS Pixel Detector
Advertisements

Ivan Peric, HV-CLICPIX measurements Chip-Top ATLAS Type A (as in CCPDv2 and v1) with the preamplifier made entirely of enclosed T and linear long feedback.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Introduction -
Development of HV CMOS sensors for 3D integration
Ivan Peric, Monolithic Detectors for Strip Region 1 CMOS periphery.
Ivan Peric, WIT Active Pixel Sensors in high-voltage CMOS technologies for ATLAS Ivan Perić University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Ivan Perić University of Heidelberg, Germany
Overview of HV/HR-CMOS Pixel Sensors
TRAPPISTE Tracking Particles for Physics Instrumentation in SOI Technology Prof. Eduardo Cortina, Lawrence Soung Yee Institut de recherche en mathématique.
CLICPix/CCPD/Mu3e (HVCMOS)
07 October 2004 Hayet KEBBATI -1- Data Flow Reduction and Signal Sparsification in MAPS Hayet KEBBATI (GSI/IReS)
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
Front End Circuit.. CZT FRONT END ELECTRONICS INTERFACE CZTASIC FRONT END ELECTRONICS TO PROCESSING ELECTRONICS -500 V BIAS+/-2V +/-15V I/O signal.
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
ALICE Inner Tracking System at present 2 2 layers of hybrid pixels (SPD) 2 layers of silicon drift detector (SDD) 2 layers of silicon strips (SSD) MAPs.
Specifications & motivation 2  Lowering integration time would significantly reduce background  Lowering power would significantly reduce material budget.
IWLC 2010 – Ivan Peric 1 Particle pixel detectors in high-voltage CMOS technology Ivan Peric University of Heidelberg.
Tera-Pixel APS for CALICE Jamie Crooks, Microelectronics/RAL SRAM Column Concept.
Foundry Characteristics
J. Crooks STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Power Pulsing in Timepix3 X. Llopart CLIC Workshop, January
Ivan Peric, CLIC Workshop HVCMOS for CLICPix V2.
AMS HVCMOS status Raimon Casanova Mohr 14/05/2015.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Technology Overview or Challenges of Future High Energy Particle Detection Tomasz Hemperek
Thanushan Kugathasan, CERN Plans on ALPIDE development 02/12/2014, CERN.
BTeV Hybrid Pixels David Christian Fermilab July 10, 2006.
10th Trento Workshop on Radiation Detectors HVCMOS Sensors for LHC Upgrade Felix Michael Ehrler, Robert Eber Daniel Münstermann, Branislav Ristic, Mathieu.
REQUIREMENTS FOR A NEW PIXEL CHIP L. Demaria - Torino INFN Lino Demaria - New Pixel Chip - Torino 01/06/2011.
Peter Fischer, Bonn UniversityPixel 2000, Genova, June 5-8, 2000 Pixel electronics for ATLAS Peter Fischer, Bonn university for the ATLAS pixel collaboration.
CMOS MAPS with pixel level sparsification and time stamping capabilities for applications at the ILC Gianluca Traversi 1,2
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
MIMO  3 Preliminary Test Results. MIMOSTAR 2 16/05/2007 MimoStar3 Status Evaluation of MimoStar2 chip  Test in Laboratory.
Ideas on MAPS design for ATLAS ITk. HV-MAPS challenges Fast signal Good signal over noise ratio (S/N). Radiation tolerance (various fluences) Resolution.
Pixel structure in Timepix2 : practical limitations June 15, Vladimir Gromov NIKHEF, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Comparison of the AC and DC coupled pixels sensors read out with FE-I4 electronics Gianluigi Casse*, Marko Milovanovic, Paul Dervan, Ilya Tsurin 22/06/20161.
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Pixel Sensors for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford for LCFI collaboration LCWS2008, 17 November 2008 Column Parallel CCD and Raw Charge Storage.
TCT measurements of HV-CMOS test structures irradiated with neutrons I. Mandić 1, G. Kramberger 1, V. Cindro 1, A. Gorišek 1, B. Hiti 1, M. Mikuž 1,2,
1 /28 LePIX – Front End Electronic conference – Bergamo 25 May 2011 – Piero Giubilato LePIX – monolithic detectors in advanced CMOS Collection electrode.
Alternative tracking technologies: Depleted CMOS Marcos Fernández García IFCA-CSIC & Departamento de Física Moderna (Universidad de Cantabria) [also visiting.
KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Status of HVCMOS Developments.
End OF Column Circuits – Design Review
Valerio Re Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy
3D CMOS monolithic 3-bit resolution pixel sensor with fast digital pipelined readout Olav Torheim, Yunan Fu, Christine Hu-Guo, Yann Hu, Marc Winter.
Dima Maneuski, Advances in rad-hard MAPS 2016, Birmingham
Ivan Peric, Christian Kreidl, Peter Fischer University of Heidelberg
Development of HV/HR CMOS sensors for the ATLAS ITk
Introduction HV HR CMOS ATLAS R&D
Charge sensitive amplifier
LHC1 & COOP September 1995 Report
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
Digital readout architecture for Velopix
Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting
A 3D deep n-well CMOS MAPS for the ILC vertex detector
Status of the Chronopixel Project
HVCMOS sensor technology R&D
R. Casanova, E. Cavallaro, F. Forster, S. Grinstein, I. Peric,
CAM in L1 pixel trigger architecture
Ivan Peric for ATLAS and CLIC HVCMOS R&D and Mu3e Collaborations
HVCMOS Detectors – Overview
TPC electronics Atsushi Taketani
OmegaPix 3D IC prototype for the ATLAS upgrade SLHC pixel project 3D Meeting 19th March, 2010 A. Lounis, C. de La Taille, N. Seguin-Moreau, G.
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
TOF read-out for high resolution timing
R&D of CMOS pixel Shandong University
On behalf of the CEPC MOST2 Vertex detector design team
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Preliminary design of the behavior level model of the chip
Presentation transcript:

HV-MAPS Designs and Results I

Introduction HVCMOS detectors are depleted active segmented detectors implemented in a CMOS process The sensor element is an n-well diode in a p-type substrate The electronics is placed inside the n-well sensor electrode. High voltage is used to deplete a part of the substrate. The main charge collection mechanism is drift of the charge signal from the depleted region HVCMOS NMOS PMOS N-well Depleted P-substrate

Substrate resistivity HVCMOS can be implemented in standard CMOS technologies These technologies have substrate resistances of 10 to 20 Ωcm. The HVCMOS structure can be improved by taking a substrate of higher resistance (for instance 100 – 1000 Ωcm) instead of the standard one. (Non-standard CMOS process) The transistors will be not affected since they are placed in n-wells and not is in the substrate itself Particle Particle Deep-n-well Deep-n-well +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +-

Sensor architectures - monolithic Depending on proposed application we have several sensor architectures. For Mu3e and strips we have the monolithic sensors. Active pixels contain usually only the analog circuits like the charge sensitive amplifier. The pixels are connected to the readout cells placed at the chip periphery. Every pixel has its readout cell. These RO cells do zero-suppression and generate hit-addresses. RO-cells contain hit buffers (Mu3e) of hit multiplexer (strips) Instead of analog pixels we are investigating the use the pixels with comparators that generate pixel addresses and transmit the addresses to the periphery. Row/Col Addr + TS One RO cell /pixel Pixel contains a charge sensitive amplifier CSA

MuPixel 92µm

MuPixel (RO-cell) 46 µm Comparator Address ROM TS DRAM 7µm DAC and SRAM Coupling capacitor CMOS digital part

MuPixel test beam Test-beam measurement February 2014 DESY Performed by our colleagues from Institute for Physics

Sensor architectures - hybrid For ATLAS pixels and CLIC we have developed the smart sensor concept We use the existing readout chips (FEI4 in the case of ATLAS and CLIC-pix in the case of CLIC) for the readout of HVCMOS sensors. Advantages in comparison with the standard hybrid sensors: The signal transmission between sensor- and readout chip can be done capacitively, without bumps Capacitively coupled pixel detectors - CCPD Another advantage can be increased spatial resolution. Many smaller pixels can be coupled to one channel of the readout chip Readout pixel Size: 50 µm x 250 µm TOT = sub pixel address Different pulse shapes + Size: 33 µm x 125 µm

Test beam results University of Geneva group has done a test beam measurement in November 2014 99.5% detection efficiency with the latest prototype (left). (Pixels with comparators.) The measurement has been done under suboptimal conditions – the bias voltage was only 12V.

Test beam results Several chips irradiated with neutrons at Jozef Stefan institute in Ljubljana. Detection efficiency with an irradiated chip (fluence 1015 neq) 96% (right) Bias voltage was reduced – 35V

HVMAPS for ATLAS

Sensor types Type A – HVCMOS Type B – HRCMOS HVCMOS CMOS PMOS must be isolated with a deep P-well N-Well N-Well Variant 1 PMOS not isolated Variant 2 PMOS isolated with a deep P-well N-Well CMOS N-Well CMOS

Readout types: in-pixel hit buffer (“column drain”) Concept: Every pixel has its own readout cell, placed on the chip periphery CSA Hit flag Comparator Priority scan logic RAM/ROM Pixel contains a charge sensitive amplifier and optionally a discriminator with a threshold tune DAC Comparator and Thr tune DAC Read Time stamp Data bus Readout cell function – time stamp is stored when hit arrives Hit data are stored until the readout Priority logic controls the readout order RO cell size in 0.18um ~ 7um x 50um (With comparator and thr-tune DAC) Without comparator: 7um x 25um Example: Pixel size 250um x 50um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 Size of periphery with comparators: 2cm x 560um (2.8 %) Size of periphery without comparators: 2cm x 280um (1.4%) Output data (8b TS + 16b Address) x 10 hits/BC = 240 total Data rate ~ 10Gb/s (assumed 10 hits/BC/4cm2) Efficiency issue: dead time per pixel after hit ~ 200ns One RO cell /pixel RowAddr + TS Shift register

Readout types: in-pixel trigger Concept: Every pixel has its own readout cell, placed on the chip periphery CSA Triggered hit flag Comparator Hit flag RAM/ROM Priority scan logic Pixel contains a charge sensitive amplifier and a discriminator with threshold tune DAC Time stamp Delayed TS and trigger Read Data bus One RO cell /pixel Readout cell function – time stamp is stored when hit arrives The stored time stamp is compared with the current time stamp If trigger arrives with the correct latency, the triggered hit flag is set Priority logic controls the readout order Four pixels share four trigger units Efficiency issue – when more than four hits within L1 delay in four pixels Estimated cell size in 0.18um without comparator ~ 7um x 50um Example: Pixel size 50um x 250um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 Size of periphery without comparator: 2cm x 560um (2.8 %) Output data (8b TS + 16b Address) x 10 hits/L1 – rate 24Mbit/s RowAddr + TS Shift register

In-pixel hit processing with the RO placed in active area Concept: Every pixel has its own readout cell, placed in the pixel itself (active area) Triggered hit flag Smart diode implementation Hit flag RAM/ROM CSA Comparator Priority scan logic N-Well Time stamp Delayed TS and trigger Read Data bus The implementation of the whole readout in active region requires deep P-Well No digital periphery required Crosstalk is an issue Limited technology choice - Lfoundry, ESPROS, X-FAB

In-pixel hit processing with the RO placed in active area HVMAPS implementation N-Well N-Well N-Well

In-pixel hit buffer

in-pixel hit buffer

in-pixel hit buffer

in-pixel hit buffer

in-pixel hit buffer

in-pixel hit buffer

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing 1 2 A B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing A 1 B 2 C D Output 1 A Output 2 B

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing 1 A B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing 1 A B C D Output 1 C Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing 1 2 A B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant-delay-multiplexing 1 2 A B C D Output 1 A Output 2 D

Constant-delay-multiplexing B C D Output 1 Output 2

Constant delay scheme CSA Comparator Pixel contains a charge sensitive amplifier and a discriminator with threshold tune DAC 2x7bit address Readout cell function – hit address with duration one time stamp is generated Hit multiplexer can cope with 2 hits per 80 pixels row or 18 simultaneous hits per matrix Efficiency issue – more than 18 hits/BC/matrix (10 hits in average) Estimated cell size in 0.18um without comparator ~ 7um x 25um Example: Pixel size 250um x 50um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 Size of periphery without comparator: 2cm x 560um (1.4 %) Output data (16b Address) x 18 hits/BC = 288 total ~ rate 11Gbit/s 18 x 16bit address

Schemes with small periphery

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel binary address CSA Address ROM Comparator hit s A sr ff Address Hit Pixel Ck hitSync n Example: Pixel size 250 um x 50 um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 9 address lines/column, 720 total Efficiency issue – more than one hit per pixel column/BC EOC buffers

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel binary address CSA Address ROM Comparator hit s A sr ff Address Hit Pixel Ck hitSync EoC buffer EoC buffer 25ns clock n Write prio. logic TS EOC buffers Read prio. logic Full flag Data In FIFO Hit RAM Address Hit TS Shift reg. Data bus Read

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel projection address CSA Address ROM Comparator hit s sr ff HitX,HitY Pixel Ck hitSync EOC buffers Example: Pixel size 250 um x 50um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 Number of segments 5 Number of primary address lines: 320/segment = 20/column = 1.6k Total The scheme can cope with larger number (~5) of simultaneous hits/80x80 pixel segment

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel projection address Example: Pixel size 250 um x 50um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 80 x 400 Number of segments 5 Number of primary address lines: 320/segment = 20/column = 1.6k Total The scheme can cope with larger number (~5) of simultaneous hits/80x80 pixel segment Orthogonal: 80 x 2 80 x 2 diagonal

Small pixels

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel binary address CSA Address ROM Comparator hit s A sr ff Address Hit Pixel Ck hitSync n Example: Pixel size 40um x 40um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 500 x 500 16 address lines/column, 8k total EOC buffers

Schemes with small periphery/in-pixel projection address Example: Pixel size 40um x 40um Chip size: ~ 2cm x 2cm Number of pixels: 512 x 512 Number of segments 8 x 8 Number of primary address lines: 256/segment = 32/column = 16k Total Orthogonal: 64 x 2 64 x 2 diagonal