Bring your own device (BYOD) refers to technology models where students bring a personally owned device to school for the purpose of learning. A personally.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karen Andrews, Bette Gray Alberta Education Bring Your Own Device to School Emerging Policies and Practices.
Advertisements

CASS Network of 21 st Century School Systems Rocky View School Division – February 15,2011.
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
BYOD: Bring Your Own Device! Mark Ray Teacher Librarian Instructional Technology Facilitator Vancouver Public Schools Groundhog Day, 2012 BYOD: Bring Your.
Bring Your Own Device Learning in the 21 st Century.
This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents The position paper of the Association for Middle Level Education.
Bring Your Own Device Parent Advisory Council JR Robson School March 31/ 14.
PORTFOLIO.
Holyoke Public Schools Professional Development By, Judy Taylor
QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING SAMANTHA RONSICK AET/531 DECEMBER 8, 2014 DANENE MIMS, INSTRUCTOR.
KEYS TO A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT Top 4 Challenges and Lessons Learned from Research Karen Andrews Senior Manager, Research and Planning.
Presenter: Ms. Krystle Scott Technology Workshop: Donorschoose.org.
Cougar Ridge Site Council April 22, What is our focus for classroom technology? District End Statement 4 Throughout life, students will understand.
1 How to know when you see it 10 researched-based practices (Jorgenson, C The Inclusion Facilitator’s Guide. Paul H. Brookes)
1 to 1 for 1 of 1 Lake Forest Country Day School.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Technology Leadership
21 st Century 2.0 Project Creating a 21 st Century Learning Environment at Hillview School.
Welcome to Target! Presented by Myra Mawn and Mandy Robertson February 5, 2014.
Microsoft Corporation Teaching with Technology. Ice Breaker.
Online Learning By Ashleigh Christie Crystal Guerard Shannon Quigley.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
March 6-7 Learning Symposium
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Middle College Social Media Committee Arizona State University Team Leader: Trudy Grantsen Team Members: Evan Saperstein and Stephanie Quintero Leading.
1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.
BYOD Smackdown Presenters Roy Hickman, Moderator David Palme, Con Stance Jeff Trudell, Pro Stance.
ISC 2016 Parent Information Session. What is BYOD? BYOD means Bring Your Own Device.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Literacy21 Education in a Changing World Watertown Public Schools Yr 2 Update Ann Koufman-Frederick, Superintendent Toni Carlson, Educational.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Culturally responsive pedagogy is situated in a framework that recognizes the rich and varied cultural wealth, knowledge, and skills that diverse students.
Online curriculum centre Faculty member training, April 2009.
CREATING THE FUTURE Challenges and Opportunities for ICT in Education and Development Patti Swarts, GeSCI Africa Regional Programme Manager TPD Workshop,
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Global e-Schools and Communities Initiatives transforming education, empowering communities, promoting development MoHEST Venue: Kenya Institute of Education.
Technology Mediated Learning (TML).  All Students are processed:  in year groupings  at the same rate  through the same pre-set curriculum  through.
Learning Deeply ErikaNielsen Andrew Chief Academic Officer Paul Teske Engagment Manager.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Developing a Flipped Classroom Facilitated with ICT Dr Katya Toneva, eLearning Advisor - University of Roehampton.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
BYOD- Bring Your Own Device Nickajack Elementary School Target Grades 4-5.
1 DUT e-Learning Project Pathfinders Review Symposium 5 March 2015.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
COLLABORATIVE WEB 2.0 TOOLS IN EDUCATION USING WIKIS & BLOGS IN THE CLASSROOM.
PYP EXHIBITION Parent Orientation
Granby: 21 st Century Citizenship College and Career Ready with One to One Computing.
Knowledge Management Edmodo. What is edmodo ? Edmodo  is a micro blogging platform created by Jeff O'Hara and Nic Borg.  is an emerging style of communication.
Department of Specialized Instruction & Student Services Strategic Plan – Initiative 1.
E-LEARNING At Churchill Park School. Parent Evening – E-learning 27 August 2014 New Zealand Curriculum definition of e- learning: E- learning is described.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
Transforming Education EDU620: MEETING INDIVIDUAL STUDENT NEEDS WITH TECHNOLOGY TATEANA PEDDIE-VICKS INSTRUCTOR: ADRIANE WHEAT MARCH COMMUNITY.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
Metacognition and its effects on teaching and learning of mathematics
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Leading and coordinating CPD – training
Learning and Working in the 21st Century Classroom
An Introduction to the 8 Components of MCL
Parents.
Project Category Grade Level
PD Goals Program Overview December, 2012
PD Goals Program Overview December, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Bring your own device (BYOD) refers to technology models where students bring a personally owned device to school for the purpose of learning. A personally owned device is any technology device brought into the school and owned by a student (or the student’s family), staff or guests. Why Bring Your Own Device?

Bring Your Own Device: A Guide for Schools “Learning is complex work and like other forms of skilled and technical work it requires that the person performing the job understand and be comfortable with his or her tool set.” -Alberta Teacher, 2011

Bring Your Own Device: A Guide for Schools School Authority Teams from:  Calgary Board of Education  Calgary Roman Catholic Separate School District  Canadian Rockies Regional School Division  Edmonton Catholic School District  Edmonton Public School District  Northern Lights School Division  Red Deer Public School District  R ocky View School Division  St. Paul Education Regional Division  Wolf Creek Public Schools

Bring Your Own Device: A Guide for Schools Stakeholder Groups:  Alberta Teachers’ Association  University of Alberta  University of Calgary Alberta Education Staff:  Karen Andrews, Alberta Education, School Technology Branch  Lynda Burgess, Alberta Education, School Technology Branch

Why did Alberta school authorities open their schools and classrooms to personally owned devices? The Alberta schools that are currently using a BYOD model were typically those that piloted one-to-one laptop learning and found it of value. These school authorities reported that students with one-to-one access were:  more engaged and invested in their own learning.  facilitated inclusion, increasing the success of all students.

Is it not possible to accomplish the same goals with school-owned devices instead of personally owned devices? A personally owned device is just that – personal. The student who owns it typically invests time, thought and energy in customizing the device, in setting it up to optimize communication, productivity and learning. The type of personally owned device that students might be allowed to bring to school in a BYOD model includes: laptops, netbooks, tablets. Some might ask the question, is it not possible to accomplish the same goals with school-owned devices instead of personally owned devices?

1. Familiarity, transparency and facility with the device by the students 2. A seamless bridge between formal and informal learning 3. Currency and Immediate traction 4. Social creation of knowledge 5. Cost and Sustainability Five key differences between student use of school-owned versus personally owned devices.

1. Familiarity, transparency and facility with the device by the students The Opportunity: A device owned by students and their parents/families:  is typically a device that the student is already using and has already customized with applications, software and organizational tools.  becomes another tool in the learning repertoire of students.  teachers recognize that every device is different and they will not be able to teach students to use specific applications step-by-step.  Teachers concentrate on what they want the student to accomplish with the device, providing or securing support through the IT department or through support from other students.

2. A seamless bridge between formal and informal learning The Opportunity: If the devices the students use beyond the school day are the same ones they use for school,  the students can seamlessly switch from personal use to learning anytime, anywhere.  The learning activities on the device are accessible to the students 24-hours-per-day, 7-days-per-week (24/7), enabling them to pursue personal interests associated with such learning.  The students are literally carrying around accessibility to academic learning that can be called up at a moment’s notice.  access to the Internet beyond the school day is important

3. Currency and Immediate traction The Opportunity: Encouraging personally owned devices can,  result in unprecedented levels of access to technology in the classroom.  reality is that many students have devices that are more current, powerful and flexible than those currently offered to them in their schools.  There can be immediate traction even when not all students and their parents opt into the BYOD model. In such cases, teachers can leverage the technologies that are available in class by organizing student work in teams that require a single device. When such levels approach ubiquity, teachers are able to embed innovative uses of technology in lesson designs and homework, confident that students will have access. When a device is required for each student, school authorities typically have school-owned devices for check out by those students who do not own a device.

The increased number of devices enables schools to increase opportunities for students to: Engage in inquiry learning Communicate effectively with peers, experts and their teachers Personalize learning Demonstrate their learning through media of their choice Express their ideas in public forums Access libraries of digital content that provide multiple pathways to learning Pursue real-world issues and topics of deep interest Attain digital citizenship Provide equitable learning opportunities, especially for students with special needs Explore and construct ideas, opinions, arguments and evidence- based reasoning collaboratively There is also an opportunity to use these technologies – both personally and school-owned devices—to level the playing field for students with diverse learning needs.

4. Social creation of knowledge The Opportunity: The use of personally owned devices can promote co-construction of knowledge through social learning (Lewis, Pea, & Rosen 2010).  The cognitive sciences research reveals that students learn more when they are actively collaborating and cooperating with peers, their teachers and other experts (Bransford 2000; Johnson & Johnson 1994).  One of the common uses of personally owned devices by students is in online collaborations with peers after school, about their school work.  It facilitates access to work in progress, files, sign on processes to communities and groups, calendars and digital content and learning environments located on the school authority’s servers.

5. Cost and Sustainability The Opportunity: The impetus for considering a BYOD model often includes the potential for cost savings. Faced with the lack of budgetary capacity to provide adequate numbers of up-to-date devices to meet teaching and learning needs, school authorities began to consider BYOD models.  However, most school authorities have found that their costs are not reduced, but rather redirected to network reconfigurations and the increased bandwidth required to support the BYOD model.  The shift from investments in devices to investments in network infrastructure and bandwidth, combined with the increased number of devices available to students for learning, translates into increased access.

Pondering the future The opportunities listed above have significant pedagogical, curricular, technological and policy implications.  They will require new approaches to teaching and learning. Incorporating personally owned devices into the learning will require a paradigm shift on behalf of all involved – educators, students, parents and community.  This is not a trivial endeavor and one that will take time but, according to Alberta educators, one that is worth the investment.