SHERPA for e-reporting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
| Folie 1 The Austrian strategy to reduce PM: perspectives and challenges Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission.
Advertisements

UK feedback on Delta V3.0 Presented by: John Stedman, Daniel Brookes, Keith Vincent, Emily Connolly 10 April 2013.
Joint Task Force on Emission Inventory & Projection / Task Force on Modeling and Measurement Workshop Wood Burning and other uncertain PM sources: activity.
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
Preparation of the guidelines for vehicle non-exhaust emission modelling of PM10 and PM2.5 in Latvia Aiga Kāla, Valts Vilnītis SIA Estonian, Latvian &
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
ENAC-SSIE Laboratoire de Pollution de l'Air Bogotá air quality Colombia, 2003.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
The use of the BelEUROS model for policy support at LNE TEMIS-workshop 8/9 October 2007 on behalf of: Mirka Van der Elst Flemish Ministry of the Environment,
NIAM – IIASA 23 rd March 2009 Assessment with the Italian national IAM of technical and non-technical measures in the Regional Air Quality Management Plans.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
1 Source apportionment of PM in the PCM model John Stedman 23 April 2010.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
A.P.R.I.L Health and Air Pollution Exposure Tuesday 23 June 2009 Pollution episode over London 2003.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Senate department of urban development Unit IX D: air pollution and noise control, M. Lutz 1 Berlin’s Air Quality Strategy: measures and expected effects.
Air quality and health impact assessment AQ information at the regional scale, urban background scale and street scale past, present and future air quality.
Black Carbon Air Pollution in Berlin
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
Risks, challenges and mitigation actions in the APICE partners’ area: between the scientific findings and new governance models - Genoa M.C. Bove, P. Brotto,F.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
European Environment Agency FAIRMODE – status quo WG1 activities Anke Lükewille Air and Climate Change Programme European Environment Agency (EEA) SMHI.
Transboundary Air Pollution Plan of Islamic Republic of Iran
CMAS Conference 2009 Johannes Bieser, Institute for Coastal Research – GKSS Science Center CMAS Conference 2009 Enhancing SMOKE to create European emissions.
Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.
EGTEI – Expert Group on Techno-economic Issues Methodology for data collection Presented by Nadine Allemand EGTEI secretariat Workshop to promote ratification.
Fairmode: Latest developments P. Thunis + Fairmode chairs & co-chairs + Fairmode Community.
Analysis of station classification and network design INERIS (Laure Malherbe, Anthony Ung), NILU (Philipp Schneider), RIVM (Frank de Leeuw, Benno Jimmink)
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
Evaluation of Polyphemus for 2004 Janusz Zyśk, Yelva Roustan, Artur Wyrwa, Denis Quelo. Atelier Polyphemus Champs-sur-Marne, 28th October 2008.
Senate department for urban development Unit IX D: air pollution and noise control, M. Lutz Integrating particulate matter Integrating particulate matter:
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Joint thematic session: from hemispheric to local scale air pollution; Twin Site project Task Force on Measurements and modelling A. Colette (TFMM),
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
The CAMS Policy products
Progress in assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region.
National inventories for Air Quality Management
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
Air quality management in France
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Urban Emissions and Projections
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
for Multi-Modal Transport
FAIRMODE Update Fairmode Steering Group.
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Local Administrative Units
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
CITY-DELTA Objectives, Methodology, and Results
EURODELTA Preliminary results
PM observations in Europe a review of AirBase information
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
19th TFMM Meeting, Geneva May 3rd 2018
Towards an Expert Panel on Clean Cities
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
On the validity of the incremental approach to calculate the impact of cities on air quality Philippe Thunis JRC- C5 TFMM - Geneva May 2018.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Assessment of LRT contribution to cities in Europe using uEMEP?
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

SHERPA for e-reporting C.A. Belis D. Pernigotti P. Thunis JRC Directorate C Energy, Transport and Climate Unit Air and Climate

E- reporting Plans & Programmes (I) Information on source apportionment (Article 13) (1) Code(s) of exceedance situation (link to G) (2) Reference year (3) Regional background: total (4) Regional background: from within Member State (5) Regional background: transboundary (6) Regional background: natural (7) Urban background increment: total (8) Urban background increment: traffic (9) Urban background increment: industry including heat and power production (10) Urban background increment: agriculture (11) Urban background increment: commercial and residential (12) Urban background increment: shipping (13) Urban background increment: off-road mobile machinery (14) Urban background increment: natural (15) Urban background increment: transboundary (16) Local increment: total (17) Local increment: traffic (18) Local increment: industry including heat and power production (19) Local increment: agriculture (20) Local increment: commercial and residential (21) Local increment: shipping (22) Local increment: off-road mobile machinery (23) Local increment: natural (24) Local increment: transboundary Data flow H: air quality plans Data flow I: source apportionment Data flow J: scenario for the attainment year Data flow K: measures

Potentials on Air quality The SHERPA screening tool AQ model Simplified SR model SHERPA Screening for High Emission Reduction Potentials on Air quality

SHERPA tool Domain: EU28 Meteorology: ECMWF 2012 Emissions: EC4MACS CTM: CHIMERE Spat. resolution: 7 km Time resolution: yearly averages Output: urban background levels Pollutants: PM2.5, PM10, NO2 Source area: ensemble of cells where DE is applied Receptor (i): grid cell where DC is calculated download: aqm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sherpa.aspx Estimates changes in concentrations in one cell (receptor) when emissions are changed in one area (source area)

Definition of city NUTS or FUA? SHERPA tool Definition of city NUTS or FUA? Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS): a hierarchy of three NUTS levels is established by Eurostat in agreement with each member state. Problem: the criteria change from country to country.

Allocation of pollutants

E- reporting P&P map model set up bar plot table

Some remarks In terms of receptor, the module acts on a location base In terms of sources (emissions) the module works with NUTS or Functional urban areas Available at any EU location on the basis of default model data (CHIMERE based) but can be adapted to other input data. New version (EMEP based) in preparation Computation time (1 min per location) Based on EU “top-down” emission inventory but it is a good starting basis to interact with cities and regions (local “bottom-up”) The report is a good starting point to interact with source apportionment based on measurements (validation) A complementary tool (SHERPA CITY) to address the local increment due to traffic (NO2 and PM) available by 2017

Example 3: A receptor with PM2.5 exceedances located in the outskirts. One example in Paris Example 1: Two receptors in Paris city with PM2.5 exceedances present similar results Example 3: A receptor with PM2.5 exceedances located in the outskirts. This site is included in the cell attributed to another FUA so the contribution from the city of Paris is in the rest of France Example 2: The contribution of sources and areas is quite different in a receptor with no PM2.5 exceedances located in the outskirts. In this case the contribution of the city of Paris is included in the FUA _Paris.

Box plot on 5 locations in Paris city center Per emissions’ macro-sector Per emission area

NUTS vs FUA selection in London (GB0959A) For e-reporting it is required to identify urban, rural and transboundary contributions for most source categories. However, establishing the boundaries of the urban areas is not straightforward. Example 1: reduction areas CITY/FUA Example 2: reduction areas NUTS NUT0*: UK-FUA NUT0: UK-London NUTS: nomenclature of territorial units for statistics FUA: functional urban areas

From urban background to the street Sherpa Gaussian Street box model SHERPA-City: a tool to address NO2 city impacts Specific city AQ plans (Low Emission Zone, Pedestrian area…) Possible change in fleet composition: ban of diesel, heavy duty Possible time restrictions Design of new infrastructure

Questions?