Office of Special Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
National Parent Technical Assistance Center Unified Technical Assistance System providing support to the PTI/CPRC network, as well as collaborating to.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Best Practices in Action in Special Education Kim Sweet, Advocates for Children of New York On the Same Page Summit September 2011.
Academy for New Special Education Leadership 2015.
Our Road to Success PIONEER SCHOOL DISTRICT. Student Demographics  Enrollment 734 students pre-K through 8 th  2.1% American Indian/Alaskan Native 
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Inclusion in Afterschool: Serving Students with Specific Needs THE WHY’S AND THE HOW’S TO MAKE IT HAPPEN!
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Building Systems of Support in Early Childhood Education 2016 OSEP VIRTUAL LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 2, 2016.
Patricia Williams & Anita Castro Special Education Team 1 Sample IEP Forms College and Career Ready.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Supporting the Whole Child
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Exceptionalities Guideline
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
Supporting Student Success
Comprehensive Planning
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Inclusion A school district shall use the term “inclusion” to mean that a student is receiving education in a general education regular class setting,
Visions of Community 2012 March 10, 2012
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Building a National Collaborative Network for Deaf-Blind Services
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Presented by Darren McIntyre, Ed.S.
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Presented by: Dr. Sue Abel
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Title I Annual Meeting J.H. C. Butler Elementary School
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Title I Annual Meeting J.H. C. Butler Elementary School
Parent and Community Engagement
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Title I Annual Meeting Sol C. Johnson High School September 6, 2018
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Office of Special Education Presentation to the Staff / Curriculum Development Network Christopher Suriano, Assistant Commissioner New York State Education Department December 2, 2016

Blueprint for Improved Results Core Principles Students engage in self-advocacy and are involved in determining their own educational goals and plan. Parents, and other family members, are engaged as meaningful partners in the special education process and the education of their child. Teachers design, provide, and assess the effectiveness of specially designed instruction to provide students with disabilities with access to participate and progress in the general education curriculum. Teachers provide research-based instructional teaching and learning strategies and supports for students with disabilities. Schools provide multi-tiered systems of behavioral and academic support. Schools provide high quality inclusive programs and activities. Schools provide appropriate instruction for students with disabilities in career development and opportunities to participate in work-based learning.

Results Driven Accountability (RDA) Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) made a shift from compliance-based monitoring to a results driven accountability (RDA) system. With the RDA system, OSEP targets its work and investments to best support states in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities.

Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS) Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS) was initiated based on the shift to the RDA system. OSEP could no longer monitor and support states using a “one size fits all” approach. The DMS system focuses on state-based monitoring and support decisions.

Levels of Support OSEP developed the following hierarchy of monitoring and support for states: Universal (minimal level of support provided to all states) Targeted (monitoring and support based on common needs in multiple states) Intensive (reserved for the most intense and complex challenges to implementation)

DMS Notice – New York May 1 - September 30, 2016 New York was identified with the following designations, based on the corresponding factors, in its DMS Notice from OSEP:

OSEP Monitoring Visit New York was selected for an OSEP DMS visit based on: size of its IDEA grant, date of its last monitoring visit, unresolved fiscal findings, recent change in leadership, and history of nonparticipation in federally funded technical assistance. The visit occurred on September 28-30, 2016.

OSEP Recommendations for New York OSEP made the following recommendations, as a result of the visit: Increase participation in OSEP-sponsored and other national technical assistance centers by NYSED staff and NYSED- funded technical assistance center staff Increase collaboration between NYSED’s fiscal and program staff Increase data driven decision making to inform monitoring and technical assistance needs

OSEP Recommendations for New York Collaborate with other NYSED offices (Title I, etc.) in the fiscal monitoring of IDEA funds Increase automated data systems Use the Blueprint for Improved Results for Students with Disabilities to drive the work of the State

DMS Notice – New York October 1, 2016 - September 30, 2017 New York was identified with the following designations, based on the corresponding factors, in its DMS Notice from OSEP:

DMS Notice – New York cont’d October 1, 2016 – September 30, 2017

DMS Notice – New York cont’d October 1, 2016 – September 30, 2017

Special Education Updates

Superintendent Determination

Grade 3-8 ELA State Assessments Changes in the Allowable Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities

Office of Special Education Presentation to the Staff / Curriculum Development Network Christopher Suriano, Assistant Commissioner New York State Education Department December 2, 2016