DSC Change Governance Review Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
#ICANN51 1 Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) Activities Update to the GNSO Council ICANN-51 Los Angeles Meeting 11 October 2014.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation Anne Aikman-Scalese, SCI Chair | ICANN-52 | February 2015.
WG 2 Progress Report at TP#9 Group Name: oneM2M TP #9 Source: WG2 leadership Meeting Date: /21 Agenda Item: WG Reports.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Gemserv1 Release Management Enduring Releases. Release Management  SEC defines Release Management as the process adopted for planning, scheduling and.
Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.
Objectives of the Training
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
xrn4361 UK Link Future Release 2
Agenda 5.11 General Regulations
Establishment of ‘Technical Sub Committee’ Action - SDG Option
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Authority decision on CAP086 –Implementation Dates
Electricity Governance Comparison
XRN4770 – NDM Sample Data – Modification 0654 delivery – Amended file format ChMC – 9th January 2019.
DSC Change Committee Summary – 13th June
Project Nexus Workgroup
0433: Inclusion of the Transmission to Distribution “System Operator Agreement Guidelines” within the Offtake Arrangements Document.
Overview XRN4665 is looking to add new EUC profiles for bands 01B & 02B New EUC profiles will be split based on Market Sector Code & Pre-Payment Meter.
Project Nexus Workgroup
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
DSC ChMC CSS update 6th July 2018
DSC Change Committee Summary – 11th July
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Definition of “Day 2 Deployment Date” Mod-11-17
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
DSC Change Committee Summary – 9th May
Change Proposals Capture to Delivery
DSC Governance Sub Group Recommendations
DSC Change Committee Summary – 13th March ‘19
4361 – UK Link Future Release 2
Release 3 Update 07th March 2018.
Release 3 Scope Selection and Plans
Change Management Committee – Retail & Networks Update
XRN4249 – Part B Data Migration Plan
CDSP Service Document amendment - high-level activity description*
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
4361 – UK Link Future Release 2
4340 – UK Link Future Release 2
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
DSC ChMC CSS update 09th January 2019
Recovery of Costs due to Invalid Ex-Ante Contracted Quantities in Imbalance Settlement 25th January 2018.
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Change Management Committee – November 2019 Update
DSC Change Committee Summary – 7th March
Project Nexus Workgroup
DSC Governance Review Group
MDD Market Participant Identity Committee - Terms of Reference
DSC Change Committee Update
DSC Governance Review Group
January 2018 ChMC update 5 new change proposals were approved
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Process for Updates to the DSC Service Description Table
Mod UNC 0674 Business Rule Development
XRN Nov 19 Release - Status Update
DSC Change Committee Update
Presentation transcript:

DSC Change Governance Review Group End to End Change Process

Proposed process for Change. Refer to process map

Recommendations Following first DSC Change Committee governance sub group meeting, following discussion and further review of the process, the following changes are recommended: Separate out ROM to be a stand-alone process DSC Change Committee can request for an EQR and BER during the Modification development process.

Considerations - EQR Stage Following production of EQR for Change Committee must adhere to CMP 4.6.12 to ensure EQR and Change Proposal do not lapse. Upon approval of EQR meet requirements of 4.6.15 but consideration to 4.6.15 (b) as would not want to amend Specific Service Change Charge Annex until such time as MOD is approved for implementation What happens with MOD process if Change Committee do not approve EQR??

Considerations - BER Stage Change Management Committee to consider how manage approval so BER? Could vote to postpone approval until a later meeting (when MOD has been approved (or not)) CMP 4.6.17. Must make a clear decision how to proceed or BER will lapse, CMP 4.6.18. BER approval stage will always be after MOD decision and BER may need to be amended following MOD decision?

Considerations Cont’d What if an alternate Modification is raised? Should MOD Process recommend a release date rather than implementation date, or both? Early indication of congestion. Should all systems impacting Modifications follow the process or Change Committee decision?? Consideration, and possible change to section 4.8.5(c) & (d) of the DSC Change Management procedures (reference 4.8.7). Costs associated with production of EQR and BER (refer to CMP 4.8.6 (c))

Assumptions The ‘Code Administrator’ or ‘Modification Proposer’ will raise the Change proposal to ChMC Only Change Management Committee can be request EQR/BER during the MOD development process (unless requested under CMP 4.8 by other parties) The Committee will make all decisions required for the EQR as per section 4.6.15 of the Change Management Procedures Other provisions stated in CMP 4.8.6 stand Sufficient information/requirements in the MOD to produce an EQR

Next Steps Agree process to recover EQR/BER costs if a MOD does not progress/get approved (stranded costs) – refer to 4.8.6 With release based delivery moving forward will BER’s be needed for each MOD/CP or expect 1 BER per release Process to develop the technical solution to progress to BER (sufficient requirements in place), who and in what group? Considerations to DSC Change Management Procedures - 4.6.18 – will have to agree as per 4.16.7 (c) Assessment of the Modification Rules to ensure proposals are not in conflict with rules. What happens to MOD process if Change Committee do not approve EQR / BER?