Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Study of Conflict in Political Science and International Relations
Advertisements

IR2501 Theories of International Relations
POSC 1000 Introduction to Politics Russell Alan Williams.
Complex Interdependence and Neoliberal Institutionalism
MDAW 2013: DCH & MBK.  Realism  Idealism  Liberalism  Marxism  Critical Theory(s)
International Relations Theory
Development Strategies Evidences from East Asia. Developmental state Paradigm of developmental state in development economics and comparative political.
Development Studies THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF ZANZIBAR (SUZA)
Theories of International Relations
Dr. Bezen Balamir Coşkun
Liberalism Central Assumptions and Propositions View of history: progressive change possible – Material: prosperity through technological progress, economic.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Critique of realism Are states the only actors No; international relations is a ‘cobweb’ of interactions and linkages between multiple actors – firms,
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Environmental Problems and Cooperation Dilemmas. The Basic Dilemma Environmental problems: global/transnational Decision making: vested in nation states.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism.
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
Theories of International Relations- Liberalism Robert Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence (1977)  The liberal conceptualization.
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
International Political Economy The Rational Choice Approach in IPE Ch. 5 Lecture 8.
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Core and Periphery – Economic Model of the World The world is a core - periphery dichotomy. This idea is called the World Systems Theory. It was developed.
Theories in International Relations: Neo-Liberalism
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
The Future Sustainability of Education for All as a Global Regime of Governance Professor Leon Tikly University of Bristol.
POSC 2200 – The State, Decision Making and Foreign Policy Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science.
International political economy Political determinants of international economics How do changes in intern.distr.of power impact the international trade.
Lecture 4 Theories of globalisation 15 March 2006.
Liberalism. Introduction Liberalism – Historical alternative to realism Promotes peace in the international system through set norms, procedures and institutions,
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Today’s Topics Realism and Liberalism 1.Finishing group discussion activity on realism in Rice speech. 2.Evaluating realism as a theory. 3.Introducing.
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Security situation in the Central Europe after 1989 Richard Turcsanyi.
KYLE IR 101. WHAT IS IT? DEFINITION Study of international events and actors.
Liberal alternatives International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
The West and the Rest. 3 main themes: The world’s cultural diversity in the age of globalization – does it breed conflict and impede cooperation? The.
The Frontier of IPE: the Evolution of Ideas Stephan Haggard Taiwan National University June 5, 2004.
Realism vs. Liberalism: Which theory best explains the current world affairs? Aikerim Daurenbayeva.
International System International Relations. Basic concepts What is IR? Who are the actors/players in IR? Why they behave in a certain way? What quality.
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
Intensive Readings in International Relations Fall 2006 Peking University Instructor: Ji Mi ( 吉宓)
International Relations
Global Politics: Comparative theories Key terms
Human Rights.
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Introduction to International Relations
Introduction to Global Politics
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
Multi-level citizenship: causes and opportunities The Dynamics of Citizenship in the Post-Political World, Stockholm University, May Andreas.
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
Security Theory And Peak Oil Theory.
STATES & NON-STATE ACTORS
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
Introduction to Global Politics
POL 100 International and Domestic Security
Theories of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism

Pluralism 1. Waltz is wrong to focus on security and conflict. (“Nice Guys” of IR: Keohane, Nye, Caporaso, Ruggie, Krasner) 1. Waltz is wrong to focus on security and conflict. 2. Other types of interaction are vital to understand the international system (e.g., economic) --Leads to mutual interdependence

Pluralism (continued) 3. Add economics to achieve an “analytical clean-up” of neo-realism. 4. Account for economic interests, not just security interests

Pluralism (continued) 1. If states are bad, let’s curb them. Disown Hobbes and downplay the state. 2. Create “regimes” 3. John Ruggie (1975) 4. Stephen Krasner (1982)

Pluralism (continued) A regime is a “set of expectations, rules and regulations, plans, organizational energies and financial commitments, which have been accepted by a group of states” (Ruggie, 1975)

Pluralism (continued) Regimes as “Social Institutions” They consist of implicit or explicit: 1. Principles 2. Norms 3. Rules and decision-making procedures Examples--GATT and OPEC NB: Regimes are made up of states

Pluralism (continued) Regimes as Intermediate Factors They help to account for cooperation and discord. Behavior is limited by the norms and rules of the regime. Regime theory de-emphasizes the state.

Pluralism (continued) The Wall Begins to Crumble Attacks on the State as the Unit of Analysis: “Turbulence” Rosenau (1990) “Region States” Ohmae (1995) Non-Traditional Threats: terrorism, drugs, crime Information Revolution Technology and Finance

Globalism A More Radical Critique (Wallerstein, Polanyi, etc.)

Globalism (Continued) Rejection of liberalism and neo- classical economic theory View of the International System: Integrated capitalist world economy Ceaseless quest for accumulation

Globalism (Continued) Countries Belong to One of Three Categories: 1. Core (capital intensive) 2. Periphery (labor intensive 3. Semi-periphery (mixture)

Globalism (continued) External Behavior Core States maintain the world economy by military or other means Change in the World Economy 1. Economic contraction and expansion 2. Upward and downward mobility of states

Globalism (summary) 1. The behavior of states is governed by the anarchic structure of the world economy. 2. Conflict is natural in the world economy. 3. Geographically-based actors are central. 4. State behavior, however, is not rational. 5. Nation-states consist of capital, labor, and the means of coercion.

Dependency Theory Emphasis on the internal consequences of dominance relations

Dependency Theory (Continued) “Penetration”by a dominant society and its forces Transnational corporations Military forces Political advisors and missionaries

Dependency Theory (Continued) Penetrate weak, dependent societies Drain local resources Transfer economic surplus to dominant society Distorts the economic and social structure

Dependency Theory (Continued) Policy Implications Self-reliant development Encourage counter-structures, policies, and values