John J. Cheslock University of Arizona

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Possible Transition from Division II to Division I The expected impacts to the University Presented jointly by the Presidents Office, Campus Life and Athletics.

Advertisements

Dan Wasson and Tom Mallon.  We wanted to determine whether or not the sponsorship of a Division 1 College has anything to do with their success rate.

College Readiness Bishop O’Connell High School Counseling Department.

NCAA (national collegiate athletic association) basketball is played differently to the NBA (national basketball association). For example the shot clock.

Beyond the Playing Field: The Significance of NCAA/NAIA Divisional Status and Athletic Conference Affiliation Kyle Sweitzer Michigan State University ASHE.

RICE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS’ FORUM JANUARY 14, 2014 The Shifting Landscape of College Athletics.

– FIRST INTERCOLLEGIATE EVENT – ROWING HARVARD VS YALE (Lake Winnepesaukee, NH) -Sponsored by Boston, Concord & Montreal.

Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics (COIA) Meeting Big Ten (Twelve) Conference Offices Chicago, Illinois January 21-23, 2011.

RADICAL REFORM OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS: Antitrust, Title IX, and Public Policy Implications Stephen F. Ross The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson.

FACTORS INFLUENCING COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT REVENUES By: Chad D. McEvoy, Alan L. Morse, and Stephen L. Shapiro Presented by: Dion Doucet.

Atlantic Coast Conference Ranking of Top Teams 1Georgia Tech University 2Clemson University 3Virginia Tech University 4Boston College.

2012 BUDGET Funding Sources Fiscal Year 2012 Tuition Supplemental Fees Mizzou Online & Cont. Education Other Student Fees.

Eleven-Year Trends in Division I Athletics Finances.

Principle 14 Finances and Sports Sponsorship. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall be administered with prudent management and fiscal.

College Sports College sports have changed much over time Equipment and rules have certainly changed, but college sports have also grown to impact other.

COLLEGEHOCKEYINC.COM. Funded by NHL and USA Hockey Education and advocacy group Represent all 59 Division I Programs What is College Hockey Inc.?

Top 10 Sports Colleges By Cody Rukamp.

Control your destiny. Control your destiny. R each H igh S cholars R each H igh S cholars.

The Progress of the Big Ten Network John A. Fortunato, Ph. D. Fordham University College Sport Research Institute Conference University of North Carolina,

1. MAC WEST TOLEDO Ball State Central Michigan Eastern Michigan Northern Illinois Western Michigan MAC EAST Akron Bowling Green Buffalo Kent State Miami.

The Volleyball Brand: What makes it unique? Kathy DeBoer, AVCA Executive Director Spring Conference May 8, 2009.

Chapter 8 Collegiate Sports. Introduction to College Athletics Business aspect has grown immensely –Budgeting, finding revenue sources, controlling expense.

The New Era of the NCAA By: Mr. Dunlap Why we are here? We have already seen during the past year, change is coming with the NCAA. Football is leading.

Inside College Sports’ Biggest Money Machine Presented By: The OARS.

College Football Playoffs Bowl Games. Determining a Champion College Football Playoff present BCS1998 – 2013 Bowl Alliance1995 – 1997 Bowl Coalition1992.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Fall Board of Visitors Meeting Friday, September 19, 2008 Development Update By Matthew G. Kupec Vice Chancellor.

TENNESSEE BOARD OF REGENTS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 19, 2010 Presentation to the Association of Government Accountants’ Winter Seminar.

© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Round 1Round 2 Final Jeopardy.

Tuition and Fees Presentation for the Senate Higher Education Committee April 1, 2009.

Andria Vetsch Karn Petersen.  Title IX effects equality in college sports  Eliminate sports Example UWRF  Creates financial issues  Affects the colleges.

The NCAA, its Conferences, and the Economics of Athletics.

 The Olympic Games is the leading international sporting event featuring summer and winter sports competitions in which thousands of athletes participate.

The NCAA in 2035 By: Mr. Dunlap Why we are here? We have already seen during the past few years, change is coming with the NCAA. Football is leading.

NCAA and Product Licensing SER Marketing.  Define the NCAA  Recognize the purpose of the NCAA  Define product licensing as it applies to SER Marketing.

The Role of Governing Bodies Chapter 12. Who Governs Sport Amateur sport is regulated and controlled by a broad spectrum of organizations that include.

State Fiscal Outlook New England Board of Higher Education Boston, MA December 5, 2008 Brian Sigritz Staff Associate National Association of State Budget.

Intercollegiate Sports Dr. Jack C. Watson II SEP 271.

NCAA LEGISLATION RULE 1.6/ PROP 48/42/16 Dr. Damien Clement African Americans in Sport.

+ Categories of Sports. + Objective To identify the different categories of sports.

What is the NCAA? NCAA – National Collegiate Athletic Association Governing body for collegiate athletics Three examples of NCAA responsibilities: – Crowns.

Divisions of the NCAA. Division I Member institutions must sponsor at least 14 sports with 2 team sports for each gender Member institutions must sponsor.

Effect of Title IX on Male and Female Athletics.

Conference Realignment. Conferences –Group of college teams within the same region which allows teams to compete in an organized and fair manner Most.

COLLEGE AND AMATEUR SPORTS

Women’s Sports & Economic Impact of College Athletics

UMKC ATHLETICS Faculty Senate 3/21/2017.

September A FAR Annual Meeting

Athletics as Enrollment Driver: The Good, The Bad, The Reality

NCAA PARTICIPANT SCHOOLS

NCAA & TITLE IV Topics & Issues.

The Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics (COIA)

Top 10 Sports Colleges By Cody Rukamp.

Unit 4: Team /School Financials

Chapter 4 Business of Sport

Let’s Talk & Get You Ready to Play!

The NCAA in 2035 By: Mr. Dunlap.

ATHLETIC PROGRAM ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

Unit 4: Team /School Financials

Unit 4: Team /School Financials

Issue area Primer for the National Foundation for Women Legislators

RS SEATTLE NROTC PROCESSING BRIEF

University Hockey in the United States: from NCAA D1 to NCAA D3 to the ACHA Bc. Patrick Rogan.

The New Era of the NCAA By: Mr. Dunlap.

Academic Culture of Athletic Programs

NCAA Emerging Sports for Women

The History of Stevenson University

What Presidents Need to Know About Intercollegiate Athletics

Men’s & Women’s Participation

Presentation transcript:

John J. Cheslock University of Arizona Maintaining Broad-Based Athletic Programs in an Era of Rapid Expenditure Growth John J. Cheslock University of Arizona

Outline Basic trends in sports participation and sports sponsorship. Basic trends in athletic expenditures. Which colleges and universities will offer broad-based athletic programs and sponsor “Olympic” sports?

Are You Ready To Be Confused? GAO (1999) reported that male athletic participation fell by 12% between 1985/86 and 1996/97. GAO (2001) reported that male athletic participation increased by 5% between 1981/82 and 1998/99. The Secretary of Education’s Commission on Opportunity in Athletics (2003) reported that the number of male participants decreased by 8% between 1981/82 and 2000/01. GAO (2007) reported that the number of male participants increased by 9% between 1991/92 and 2004/05.

Sports Participation Trends Across NCAA Divisions: 1995/96-2004/05 For women, there was steady growth across all NCAA divisions and subdivisions. For men, there was substantial growth in Divisions II and III, no change in Divisions I-AA and I-AAA, slight declines in I-A (BCS), and substantial declines in I-A (non-BCS).

Sports Sponsorship Trends Across NCAA Divisions: 1988/89 to 2006/07 Division Men Women Div. I -278 +701 Div. II + 44 +501 Div. III +265 +869

Sponsorship Trends Differ by Sport Gymnastics Lacrosse Division Men Women Men Women Div. I -25 -13 0 +39 Div. II -5 -13 +15 +32 Div. III -5 -12 +46 +88

Athletic Expenditure Growth Cheslock (2008) found a 6.8% compound annual growth rate in Div. I athletic expenditures between 1995/96 and 2004/05. Fulks (2008) reported that all three subdivisions in Division I had rates between 6.4% and 6.9% between 2003/04 and 2005/06. Orszag & Israel (2009) found a growth rate of 6.8% between 2004 and 2007.

Benefits of Expenditure Restraint If expenditures at the median athletic program grew by 5% rather than 7% between FY 2006 and FY 2007, then FY 2007 expenditures would be reduced by $715,120 in Div. I-A $189,700 in Div. I-AA $174,380 in Div. I-AAA

Which Athletic Programs Sponsor “Olympic” sports? Broad-based athletic programs Funded by substantial subsidies provided by the institution or donors. Funded by profits generated from revenue-generating sports. Maintained through effective cost control. Programs with atypical sports offerings.

Average Sports Sponsorship by NCAA Division: 2004/05 Division Mean Div. I 19.0 Div. II 14.1 (Max = 25) Div. III 17.7

Division III Broad-Based Programs (Based on Number of Sports Sponsored) New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC): mean = 29.3; min = 27. Centennial Conference: mean = 23.3. MIT (44), St. Lawrence (34). No other institution sponsors more than 26 sports.

NCAA Division I Sports Sponsorship by Subdivision Subdivision Mean Div. I-A (BCS) 21.8 Div. I-A (non-BCS) 18.0 (Max = 26) Div. I-AA 19.8 Div. I-AAA 16.7 (Max = 24)

Division I-AA Sports Sponsorship Ivy League: mean = 34.8; min = 29. Patriot League: mean = 25.6; range = 25-27. Sacred Heart U (32), James Madison (28), Georgetown (26). No other program sponsors more than 24 sports.

Sports Sponsorship by BCS Conference Conference Mean Big 10 25.0 Big East 22.8 ACC 22.8 Pac-10 22.7 SEC 19.5 (max = 23) Big 12 18.8 (max = 23)

Broad-Based BCS Programs Ohio State (37) North Carolina (28) Stanford (36) Maryland (27) Boston College (31) Michigan (27) Penn State (29) Notre Dame (26) Rutgers (29) Duke (26) UC-Berkeley (29)

Broad-Based Programs and “Olympic” Sports Only 10% of the 321 Division I programs sponsored at least 25 sports. But 53% of the 15 Division I programs that sponsored men’s gymnastics were in that category. The same is true for 72% of the 25 Division I programs that sponsored women’s fencing.

Broad-Based Programs and “Olympic” Sports (part 2) When broad-based programs cut sports, rarely sponsored “Olympic” sports are usually the first to be eliminated: Rutgers (fencing, men’s crew) James Madison (fencing, gymnastics, wrestling, archery) MIT (gymnastics, wrestling, pistol, ice hockey)

Setting the Stage Can current broad-based athletic programs continue to sponsor large numbers of sports in the future if rapid expenditure growth continues? How do we restrain expenditures?