Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Basic Training on Project Proposal
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MAF’s M & E System Development Achievements and Ways Forward SWG-ARD, September 30, 2014 DoPC, MAF By: Somphathay Liengsone Deputy Director of Project.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Cross-cutting Issues And other things your project document must include.
Program (project team) Overall Goal / Vision Interest, Motivation, Role & Responsibility of the Project Intermediate Goal(s) Boundary Partners & their.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
The Development of BPR Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Developing a Project Proposal
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
WEAP Workshop Work Plans/Progress Reports Geoff O’Brien.
Developing a Project Proposal ACTRAV-Turin. Contents Concept of “Logical Framework Approach” SPROUT – model project proposal Individual activity Presentation.
The Logical Framework (Log Frame). Programs & Projects Programs Broad areas of work required to implement policy decisions. Usually focused on a sector.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
2.4.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 4. organizational structure for M&E.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Recommendations on project/action design and structure.
Session IX: Elements of Project Proposal
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Overview Module 3: Project Formulation/Preparation
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Workplace Projects.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Leaders Facilitate the Planning Process
The Logical Framework Approach
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
FEASIBILITY STUDY Feasibility study is a means to check whether the proposed system is correct or not. The results of this study arte used to make decision.
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
Communication plan.
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Define the nature and purpose of planning
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 6
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Developing a shelter strategy
Performance and Quality Improvement
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Assessment of quality of standards
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Interest, Motivation, Role & Responsibility of the Project
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy

Learning objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to Describe what constitutes the organizational strategy for their organization and how it was planned. Discuss why it is necessary to review the organizational strategy or plan and individual strategies for interventions. Present the concepts and tools to review an organizational strategy or plan and individual strategies for interventions. Apply the concepts and tools to review their NARS organizational strategy as a prerequisite for designing their organisation’s M&E system.

Developing the organizational strategy for PNG NARS organizations Organizational (strategic) level strategic planning Program level program planning Project level project planning Project activity level project activity planning

Result of planning process Individual strategies for the interventions are described in separate documents: The strategic plan Program plans Project plans Project activity plans All individual strategies for interventions make up the organizational strategy

Precondition for M&E A precondition to designing an M&E system is that the planning process has been completed and that all planning documents describing the individual strategies for all current interventions are prepared.

Planning documents Purpose: describe in detail the intervention’s strategy record what was discussed and agreed by stakeholders and staff serve as a repository of information and data generated during the planning phase guide managers and staff during implementation reference for outsiders to learn about particular interventions and the organizational strategy as a whole basis for future planning or re-planning foster consensus and common understanding on what an intervention attempts to achieve provide the information needed to conduct efficient and effective M&E.

Planning documents Purpose: Constitute the organizational memory on interventions Should be freely accessible and referred to regularly by managers and staff Should be prepared according to a standardised template or table of content for each type of intervention 2.5.7

Planning documents Basic content of a project plan: 1. Background - The problem and why it is urgent - What has already been done 2. Beneficiaries 3. Project logframe: goal, purpose, outputs 4. Project activities 5. Project management 6. Time frame/overall work plan 7. Summary of inputs 8. Budget 9. M&E plan

Purpose of reviewing the organizational strategy To ensure that it is sufficiently developed and defined for effective and efficient M&E of the strategy to take place.

Purpose of reviewing the organizational strategy Overall organizational strategy and the individual strategies of the interventions form the basis for M&E in the NARS organisation. Weaknesses in the organizational strategy or the individual strategies for interventions will translate into ineffective M&E. Last chance to remedy any weaknesses, check the coherence and development logic, improve strategies Take corrective action now and avoid wasting resources Do before the specific M&E operations plans for the interventions at all organizational levels are developed.

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy Planning documents describe the hierarchy of objectives for interventions:  Goal  Purpose  Outputs  Activities

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy Objectives should be SMART Specific: Unique to the intervention; succinct description; shared understanding; according to level of objective. Measurable: Ability to provide some proof that objective has been achieved. Achievable: Ability to achieve the objective with the existing means and resources, time and in the present environment. Relevant: Achievement of this objective is necessary for the strategy to succeed Time-framed: Clear description when objectives have to be achieved. 2.5.12 12

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy hierarchy of objectives summarises the solution to an constraint, problem or need – the strategy to solve it individual hierarchies of objectives for interventions form the building blocks for the overall organizational strategy the organizational strategy relates individual strategies of all interventions link to a higher development outcome – ultimately the organizational goal. 2.5.13 13

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy For the strategy of each particular intervention to contribute to the higher goal, it must include: a plausible purpose related to the goal, outputs related to the purposes and activities related to the outputs. If not, organizational strategy cannot succeed, and M&E is a waste of time and resources. 2.5.14 14

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy Test the vertical logic of the hierarchy of objectives Goal If purpose, then goal Purpose If outputs, then purpose Outputs If activities, then outputs Activities 2.5.15 15

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy Test the causality or link between hierarchies of objectives of different interventions A Model of a Cascading Logic for a NARS Organization 2.5.16 16

Checking the design and logic of the organizational strategy Understand the organizational strategy ‘on paper’ Understand the development logic - the path to impact Understand how each intervention will contribute to development 2.5.17 17

Mistakes made when defining and formulating the hierarchy of objectives Defining overly ambitious goal/purposes, given local conditions and available resources and capacities. Overlooking key activities and outputs that are needed to achieve higher-level objectives (outcomes/purpose/goal). Poor logic as to why particular activities are needed for a certain output or particular outputs for a certain purpose. Objectives expressed too vaguely to know what will be achieved or how to implement ideas. Inclusion of principles, such as "stakeholder participation" or "gender equity", as separate purposes or outputs, instead of integrated into project activities. Confusion in the levels of the objective hierarchy. Source: IFAD 2003 THANK YOU!