Understanding Standards National 5 and Higher Course Event

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS & A2 Music Technology The Knights Templar School 2014 – 2016.
Advertisements

Middle Years Programme
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Physical Education: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Kirkcaldy High School National 4/5 English August 2014.
Understanding Standards: Biology An Overview of the Standards for Unit and Course Assessment.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Design and Manufacture: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Key messages from Verification  Use valid and reliable assessments  SQA-produced Unit Assessment Support Packs  Centre devised assessments.
V-Cert Music Technology Operate a digital audio workstation UNIT 1 – Stage 2 BRIEF: Be able to set up a digital audio workstation. TEACHING : Complete.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Computing Science National 3 to National 5.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Computing Science Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs MUSIC TECHNOLOGY National 3 to 5.
New Zealand Diploma in Business National External Moderation Reports Tertiary Assessment & Moderation.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 3, 4 & 5.
GCSE Music Cove School Music Department. Why GCSE Music? Do you perform better with course work than examinations? Are you creative? Do you enjoy practical.
Qualifications Update: Music Technology (Higher) Qualifications Update: Music Technology (Higher)
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Music: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Qualifications Update: Higher Media Qualifications Update: Higher Media.
A2 Agreement Trial ICT November Agenda  GCE ICT – Entries and Transitional Arrangements  Outcomes and Issues  10.45Coffee  11.15Principal.
A2 Agreement Trial ICT November Key Points from Moderation  Majority of centres applied the assessment criteria successfully  Tasks selected and.
A2 Agreement Trial ICT November AGENDA  New Specification Principal Moderator’s Report Exemplar Materials  Lunch  1.00 Exemplar Materials.
GCE Software Systems Development A2 Agreement Trial Implementing Solutions October 2015.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Gàidhlig National 3/4/5.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
National 4 & 5 Physical Education. Documents available on website Unit by Unit approach to Performance (package 1) Unit by Unit approach to Factors impacting.
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Understanding Standards: National 5/Higher RMPS
Understanding Standards:
Understanding Standards: SCQF Levels 3 – 6 Scottish Studies Award
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Nominee Training Event 2016
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Aims of the Day To support teachers, lecturers and assessors in their understanding of national standards for external assessment in Dance at both National.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards Event Fashion & Textile Technology
Understanding Standards: Higher Course Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Understanding Standards:
Understanding Standards
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
National 5 Computing Science Specimen Question Paper
Understanding Standards Statistics (Advanced Higher)
Fashion & Textile Technology
Understanding Standards: Higher Course Event
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards An overview of course assessment
Understanding Standards Art and Design (Higher)
LO3 - Create the Game 2016 Specification - L/615/1355
Revised National 5 Course Assessment Hospitality: Practical Cake Craft
Understanding Standards Physical Education Higher
Revised Higher Course Event
Revised National 5 Course Assessment Hospitality: Practical Cookery
Understanding Standards: Course Event
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Revised Higher Course Assessment Higher Design and Manufacture
Music Technology What’s in the course?
Health and Food Technology Understanding Standards event
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
An overview of course assessment
Understanding Standards An overview of course assessment
Understanding Standards An overview of course assessment
Preparing students for assessments Janet Strain Ann Jakeman
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Standards National 5 and Higher Course Event Music Technology

Aims of the Day To support Teachers, Lecturers and Assessors in their understanding of national standards by: Reviewing candidate evidence Discussing this evidence and associated Marking Instructions with colleagues Asking questions and seeking clarification about national standards Discussing course implementation with colleagues

Review of National 5 Music Technology Component 1 - Music Question Paper The Question Paper performed reasonably well during year three. The paper contained a wide range of music excerpts and provided suitable challenge and demand for this level. Most candidates performed well in the Question Paper and it was evident that candidates were well prepared.

N5 Music Technology Question Paper Areas in which candidates performed well Question 1 (a), (b), (c): Candidates are assessed on styles of music and related concepts, most candidates were well prepared and able to identify the correct answers. Question 2 (c): Candidates are assessed on microphone selection, type of polarity and placement, most candidates were well prepared and able to identify the correct answers.

N5 Music Technology Question Paper Areas in which candidates performed well Question 3 (a), (b), (d): Candidates are assessed on a range of technological and musical concepts. Most candidates were able to identify the correct answers. Question 5: Candidates are assessed on identifying instruments/voices and linking these to controls and effects. Most candidates were able to identify the correct answers.

N5 Music Technology Question Paper Areas in which candidates performed well Question 6 (a): Candidates are assessed by linking an instrument/voice with an effect and another instrument and voice with panning on two versions of the one song. Most candidates were able to identify the correct answers. the correct answers.

N5 Music Technology Question Paper Questions which candidates found demanding Question 1 (d): Some candidates had difficulty identifying the correct music concept. Question 3 (c): Some candidates found difficulty commenting on two production features common to a musical, in some cases candidates listed performance features instead. Question 3 (e): Some candidates found difficulty identifying a concept best describing the guitar part.

N5 Music Technology Question Paper Questions which candidates found demanding Question 4 (a) (i) and 4 (a) (ii): Some candidates found difficulty identifying the correct time signature and Italian string term. Question 4 (b): Some candidates found difficulty listing two settings on a reverb effects processor. In some cases candidates listed types of reverb rather than a setting. Question 6 (b): Some candidates found difficulty answering the correct tonality of the song.

Review of Higher Music Technology Component 1 - Question Paper Many candidates performed well in this component, and it was clear that centres had prepared them well. Candidates were presented with a wide range of music excerpts which provided suitable challenge and demand for this level

Higher Music Technology Question Paper Areas in which candidates performed well Question 1: Candidates identify a musical genre and associated music feature. The majority of candidates accessed the full range of marks. Question 2b: Candidates identify a music feature. Almost all candidates answered successfully. Question 5b: Candidates identify a musical genre and an associated music feature. A high number of candidates accessed the full range of marks. Question 7: Candidates identify five music/production features from a list of ten. Candidates were well prepared for this question and a high percentage of candidates were able to access the full range of marks.

Higher Music Technology Question Paper Questions which candidates found demanding Question 3 (a) (i) and (ii): Candidates identify a fault and describe a solution. Some candidates had difficulty in answering this question. Question 5b: Candidates describe mic’ing techniques. Some candidates found difficulty in adapting their knowledge and understanding to the given context of the question. Question 6 (part 3): Candidates identify a process applied to a vocal track. Some candidates were unable to identify the process. Question 6 (part 5): Candidates identify the setting being manipulated on a high pass filter. Many candidates found difficulty with this question.

Review of National 5 Music Technology Component 2 - Music Technology Assignment The Music Technology Assignment was successfully completed to a high standard. Candidates opted to submit a variety of assignment briefs. Most candidates followed the design briefs and effectively completed this component. The average mark for the assignment was 50/70.

National 5 Music Technology Assignment Areas in which candidates performed well For the assignment brief most candidates demonstrated a secure knowledge of: Stage 2(a) ‘implementing the production’ - audio capture Stage 2(b) ‘mixing skills’ Stage 2(c) ‘creative and appropriate use of sound and/or music’

National 5 Music Technology Assignment Areas which candidates found demanding Some candidates had difficulty with stage 1 ‘planning the production’. Some candidates had difficulty with stage 3 ‘evaluating the production’.

National 5 Music Technology Assignment Sample of the work of five candidates Multi-track - exemplar Audio book - exemplar Foley - exemplar Sound design for a computer game – marking exercise

Review of Higher Music Technology Component 2 - Assignment The assignment was completed successfully, with many centres submitting high quality material which showcased candidates’ creativity. Candidates submitted a wide range of material, from radio broadcast, through audio books to Foley and sound design for film, animation or gaming. In most cases, candidates successfully followed the sample briefs or briefs adapted by their centre. Centres are confident in adapting Assignment briefs successfully.

Higher Music Technology Assignment Areas in which candidates performed well Candidates performed particularly well in this component, with many achieving excellent marks. The average mark for the assignment was 51/70. In most cases the Music Technology Assignment was completed successfully. Evidence suggests that centres are comfortable in implementing a variety of assessment briefs, and in adapting sample briefs to suit their own candidates.  

Higher Music Technology Assignment Areas in which candidates performed well   The majority of candidates demonstrated a secure knowledge of Stage 2: Implementing the production, comprising: 2 (a) audio capture, including mic placement and techniques 2 (b) manipulation and sequencing skills 2 (c) creative and appropriate use of sound and/or music

Higher Music Technology Assignment Areas in which candidates performed well   There is strong evidence that centres are preparing candidates well for Stage 2. Centres are using appropriate resources and are providing candidates with good experiences at this level, in working both with hardware and software. Candidates are generally adept at the practical implementation of acquired skills, knowledge and understanding. Centres are demonstrably confident in preparing candidates and in adapting Assignment briefs.

Higher Music Technology Assignment Areas which candidates found demanding Some candidates had difficulty with Stage 1: Planning the production. Some candidates did not submit sufficiently detailed planning following the criteria in the Course Assessment Task document and Course Assessment Specification. Some candidates had difficulty with Stage 3: Evaluating the production. Some candidates did not submit sufficiently evaluative reports following the criteria in the Course Assessment Task document and Course Assessment Specification.

Year 2 of Higher Music Technology Sample of the work from five candidates Radio broadcast – exemplar Audio book – exemplar Sound design for gaming – exemplar Radio broadcast – marking exercise

Important Dates Uplift dates for Music Technology Assignment National 5 Music Technology 22/03/17 Higher Music Technology 27/04/17 Music Technology Exam dates National 5 Music Technology 10/05/17 Higher Music Technology 10/05/17

WWW.sqa.org.uk│0303 333 0330