Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) IT Infrastructure LoB Meeting June 5, 2008 Kshemendra Paul KPaul@omb.eop.gov Chief Architect Office of Management and Budget For more information see notes page.

Agenda Introductions Key Messages Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) 101 Annual Assessment – Today and Tomorrow FEA Budget Visualization – Vertical vs. Horizontal Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG) Practical Guide to Federal Service Oriented Architecture (PGFSOA) Questions & Discussion Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

Shared Leadership – Shared Results Segment Architectures are the Key Key Messages Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money Shared Leadership – Shared Results Segment Architectures are the Key Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

FEA Context – Business Case Scoring This slide shows information about Business Case Scoring and shows a “spider’s web that shows the Exhibit 300 Evaluations Profile. Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

FEA Context – Reference Models This diagram shows the FEA Context Reference models. It runs as follows: Performance Reference Model to Business Reference Model to Service Component Reference Model to Data Reference Model to Technical Reference Models. These are business driven approaches to component based architecture. Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

FEA Context – Architecture Levels This slide shows the FEA Context Architecture levels. It breaks it diwn for EA, SA and Solutions Architecture. It outlines Scope, Detail, Impact and Audiences. Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

Transition Strategy / Federal Transition Framework The primary challenge of EA value measurement is to demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between actions within the EA program and improvements to agency performance. In some cases, there may be many contributing factors resulting in a specific performance improvement, of which the EA program is only one. Moreover, cause and effect may not always be proximate in time. The EA program may identify opportunities to make IT investments influencing agency performance in subsequent fiscal years Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

Annual Assessment – Framework Integrated IT Lifecycle Architect Invest Implement Threshold for GREEN Completion 4.0 Use 4.0 Results 4.0 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)* Performance Architecture Business Architecture Data Architecture Service Component Architecture Technology Architecture Transition Strategy Governance and Program Mgt. Change Mgt. and Deployment Segment Architectures/ Collaboration and Reuse CPIC Integration Cost Savings and Cost Avoidance Transition Strategy Performance Enterprise Architecture Value IPv6 The Framework consists of three sections: Completion - Evaluates the existence and maturity of the as-is architecture, to-be architecture and transition planning Use - Evaluates the maturity of the processes that support or are supported by EA Results - Evaluates the results being achieved from the EA How Review of Artifacts Assignment of Policies and Procedures Evaluation of Measures and Metrics Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

Proposed Changes to Assessment Framework Integrated IT Lifecycle Architect Invest Implement Threshold for GREEN Completion 4.0 Use 4.0 Results 4.0 Proposed Evolution Any Segments Priority Segments: Core Mission (RMO Input) IT Infra & Info Sharing EA Policy & Process, CPIC Process Integration Measured Alignment between ETP and Portfolio of 300s & 53 Performance Mgmt Integration Indirect Indicators (PART, IT as a percent of discretionary spend) Attributable, Causal Results Implementation of ETP The Framework consists of three sections: Completion - Evaluates the existence and maturity of the as-is architecture, to-be architecture and transition planning Use - Evaluates the maturity of the processes that support or are supported by EA Results - Evaluates the results being achieved from the EA How Template-based segment submissions Use of segment codes to measure alignment Delivery against planned improvement commitments Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

FEA Budget Visualization – Federal IT Budget Federal IT Spending by Agency To see this chart on Federal IT Spending by Agency, go to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/documents/FY09_IT_Budget_Rollout.pdf or at www.egov.gov Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government * Dollars shown in millions

FEA Budget Visualization – BRM & SRM View Core Mission Enterprise Services This slide has a diagram that shows the FEA Budget Visualization- BRM and SRM view It has core missions, business case services and supporting services for the FED GOV. It shows the number of investments and the amount of each request. More at www.egov.gov Business Services Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government * Dollars shown in millions

Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG) Goal: Increase the value from, and use of, segment architecture Process & Deliverables: Identify most valuable segment architecture products and ideas Self-selected, proven, and supported Analyze and index best practices Synthesize and publish guidance, methodology, templates, and training materials Template-based view for segment architectures Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

NGPG – Targeted Outcomes Shared Best Practices Faster Time to Complete Greater Consistency and Completeness Lower Barriers to Reuse Architectures Solutions Services Information Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

PGFSOA - Background Federal CIO Council Targeting Chief Architects Architecture & Infrastructure Committee American Council on Technology / Industry Advisory Council Targeting Chief Architects CIOs, & Program Executives Goal is to Provide Practical & Useful Guidance Leverages Existing Best Practices Focus on Federal-Specific Context Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

PGFSOA – Organization (~70 Pages) Executive Summary & Acknowledgements Introduction Rationale Target Keys to Implementation Roadmap Glossary & References Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

PGFSOA – Target Service Oriented Enterprise Agreed behaviors and clear incentives for collaboration Mutually leveraged investments Enhanced mission outcomes Service Oriented Architecture Interoperability at build time based on open standards and composable adapters Agile recapitalization Centrally-managed registries and repositories Service Oriented Infrastructure Secure, scalable infrastructure as a service Interoperability at run time Service enabled network Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

PGFSOA – Review & Revise Process Go to the PGFSOA Wiki http://smw.osera.gov/pgfsoa/index.php/Welcome Read the “PGFSOA QuickStart for Contributors” Read the document (including list of contributors) Look at the discussion pages and recent contributions Make attributes contributions Track the evolution of the document including your input Web 2.0 Style Process version 1.1 Seeking adoption and use on the merits With use and results, feedback and future iterations PGFSOA Editorial Board makes final decisions Based on input – skewing towards Practitioners Eventually will be put forward to FCIOC for formal endorsement Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

Questions and Discussion Key Messages: Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money Shared Leadership – Shared Results Segment Architectures are the Key Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

For Further Information: www.egov.gov Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government