POLITENESS STRATEGIES: Taken from: BROWN AND LEVINSON (1987: ) POLITENESS: Some Universals in Language Usage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENDERED COMMUNICATION PRACTICES
Advertisements

Politeness Theory and Discourse Lecture 7. Objectives After this lecture, students should be able to: 1.Explain the notions of politeness and face 2.Explain.
Research Methods for T&I Studies I Politeness Phenomena.
Discourse and Pragmatics Politeness and Face. Popular Meanings Face: mian zi, min ji, mentsu, chae myon Concept of honour Politeness: Being ‘nice’, following.
1 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English COOPERATION, POLITENESS AND FACE Lecture 14.
Talk in Life and Literature LO: to understand the basis of the question and the differences between crafted and ‘real’ talk.
AS English Language Unit 3 Spoken Interaction Conversation Analysis Conversation Theory.
Face and Face Management Psychology of Language John R. Baldwin School of Communication--ISU.
Politeness Lecture 11.
Interpersonal Skills for Dealing with Conflict: Respect and Support in Action Tricia S. Jones, Ph.D. Dept. of Psychological Studies in Education Temple.
POLITENESS SITI AGRI RIYANTI ARIEN HUSNA IRRA WAHIDIYATI TUTI HASTUTI.
Interpersonal Communication Politeness Theory Chris Lewis.
Politeness in language
Consolidating Grice, Brown & Levinson, and Goffman
Politeness Starter – How might Politeness be connected to English Language and Literature? Learning Objective – to explore Brown and Levinson’s politeness.
Brown and Livenson’s Politeness Theory.
The Concept of ‘Face’ – Brown and Levinson
S OLIDARITY AND P OLITENESS Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
Politness and Face theory
Notes on Face & Politeness. Face and Facework Goffman Face: The positive social image we seek to maintain during interaction. Why is Goffman’s perspective.
Introduction to linguistics II
Northern Metropolitan Region Achievement Improvement Zones.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
Discourse Analysis Force Migration and Refugee Studies Program The American University in Cairo Professor Robert S. Williams.
Issues in Multiparty Dialogues Ronak Patel. Current Trend  Only two-party case (a person and a Dialog system  Multi party (more than two persons Ex.
Politeness & Speaking Style Discourse & Dialogue CS 359 November 15, 2001.
Politeness & Speaking Style Discourse & Dialogue CMSC November 22, 2006.
ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.
FACE. Goffman’s Face Erving Goffman was intrigued by what lay behind everyday expressions such as ‘losing face’, ‘saving face’ and ‘being shamefaced’.
PRAGMATICS 3. CH 7: POLITENESS AND INTERACTION Arrange these in order of politeness: (least polite first) Set the table! Could you please set the table?
Principles of conversation
Politeness.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
FACE & FACE WORK Social & Cognitive Approaches to
Communication skills How speaking and listening make life easier, more productive, and more fun!
Analysis of spontaneous speech
Interpersonal Skills for Dealing with Conflict: Respect and Support in Action Tricia S. Jones, Ph.D. Dept. of Psychological Studies in Education Temple.
Questions.
MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English
8th Grade Family Life Unit - Intro
Positive and negative politeness
Lecture 3. Verbal Communication
POLITENESS PRINCIPLE:
Politeness Negative and Positive Face
Effective Refusal Skills to Negative Peer Pressure
PRAGMATICS 3.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Politeness in Language
Approaches to Discourse Analysis
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE:
POLITENESS AND INTERACTION
Language & Occupation What is special about the language of work?
Language Variation Part II.
Teaching Functions Using Movie Subtitles
Speech Acts.
Questions 2 and 3 Identification and Analysis
Politeness In Language
UNIT 3 - POLITENESS.
Communicating assertively
AGREE AND DISAGREE 11/12/2018.
Sociological analysis of CC misunderstanding
Semantics Seven kinds of speech acts
Language Functions In English
Cultural Differences CE 104 Civil Engineering Projects
Healthy Relationships
Effective Refusal Skills to Negative Peer Pressure
English in the Workplace
a.a Traduzione Lingua inglese 1 Olga Denti
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

POLITENESS STRATEGIES: Taken from: BROWN AND LEVINSON (1987: ) POLITENESS: Some Universals in Language Usage.

FACE  Face : a person’s feeling of self-worth and self-image. Two kinds of face: 1.Positive Face refers to our need to be accepted and liked by others and our need to feel that our social group shares common goals. 2.Negative Face refers to our right to independence of action and our need not to be imposed on by others.

FACE THREATENING ACT  Face Threatening Act (FTA): an illocutionary act which is able to damage another person’s reputation / threaten other people’s face.  There are two types of FTA:  Act threatening the negative face  Act threatening the positive face  Act threatening the negative face of the addressee: orders, requests, threats, and warnings from the speaker.  Act threatening the positive face of the addressee: offers and promises from the speaker.

POLITENESS STRATEGIES According to Brown and Levinson (1987:91-225), there are four strategies for doing FTA: 1.Bald on Record 2.Positive Politeness 3.Negative Politeness 4.Off Record

BALD ON RECORD STRATEGY  Bald on-record: These provide no effort by you to reduce the impact of the FTA’s. You will likely shock the person to whom you are speaking to, embarrass them, or make them feel a bit uncomfortable. However, this type of strategy is commonly found with people who know each other very well, and are very comfortable in their environment, such as close friends and family. Example: - An emergency: Help! - Task oriented: Give me that! - Request: Put your coat away. - Alerting: Turn you headlights on!

BALD ON RECORD STRATEGY Bald-on-record strategy can be treated as speaking in conformity with Grice’s Maxims (Grice, 1975). These maxims are an intuitive characterization of conversational principles that would constitute guidelines for achieving maximally efficient communication.  Cases of non-minimization of the face threat: maximum efficiency is very important, and this is mutually known to both S and H, no face redress is necessary. Example: Help! ( not “Please help me”.)  Cases of FTA-oriented bald-on-record usage: It is oriented to face. This illustrates the way in which respect for face involves mutual orientation, so that each participant attempts to foresee what is other participant is attempting to foresee. Example: “Come in, don’t hesitate, I am not busy”.

POSITIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES  Positive Politeness: It is usually seen in groups of friends, or where people in the given social situation know each other fairly well. It usually tries to minimize the distance between them by expressing friendliness and solid interest in the hearer’s need to be respected (minimize the FTA) Example: - Attend to the hearer: “You must be hungry, it’s a long time since breakfast. How about some lunch?” - Avoid disgreement: A: “What is she, small?” B: “Yes, yes, she’s small, smallish, um, not really small but certainly not very big.”

POSITIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES: 1.Notice, attend to H (his interest, wants, needs, and goods). 2.Exaggerate (interest, approval, sympathy with H) 3.Intensify interest to H. 4.Use in-group identity markers (address form, use of in group language or dialect, use of jargon or slang, contraction and ellipsis). 5.Seek agreement (safe topics, repetition) 6.Avoid disagreement (token agreement, pseudo- agreement, white lies, hedging opinions) 7.Presuppose/raise/assert common ground.

POSITIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES (Cont…) 8.Joke 9.Assert or presuppose S’s knowledge of and concern for H’s wants. 10.Offer, promise. 11.Be optimistic. 12.Include both S and H in the activity. 13.Give (or ask for) reasons. 14.Assume or assert reciprocity. 15.Give gifts to H (goods, sympathy, understanding, cooperation).

NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES  Negative Politeness: The main focus for using this strategy is to assume that you may not be imposing on the hearer, and intruding on their space. Therefore, these automatically assume that there might be some social distance or awkwardness in the situation. Example: - Be indirect: “I’m looking for a comb.” - Forgiveness: “You must forgive me but…….” - Minimize imposition: “I just want to ask you if I could use your computer?”

NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES: 1.Be indirect: e.g. by using indirect speech acts. 2.Question, hedge: e.g. by asking questions such as ‘Could you do this for me?’ 3.Be pessimistic about things: e.g. by saying ‘This probably won’t be necessary but … ‘ 4.Minimize imposition on the other person: e.g. by saying ‘I just wanted to ask if you could …’ 5.Give deference: e.g. by the use of certain address forms.

NEGATIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES (Cont..) 6.Apologize to the other person: e.g. by indicating reluctance or begging forgiveness. 7.Impersonalize things: e.g. by the use of the plural ‘you’ vs ‘I’. 8.State the imposition as a general social rule or obligation by using ‘request’ as a noun rather than ‘want’ as a verb. 9.Go ‘on record’ as incurring a debt, or not ‘indebting’ to the other person. 10.Nominalize

OFF RECORD STRATEGIES  Off-Record (indirect): You are removing yourself from any imposition whatsoever. Example: - Give hints: “It’s cold in here” - Be vague: “Perhaps someone should have been more responsible.” - Be sarcastic, or joking: “Yeah, he’s a real rocket scientist!”

OFF RECORD STRATEGIES: 1.Give hints 2.Give association clues. 3.Presuppose. 4.Understate. 5.Overstate 6.Use tautologies 7.Use Contradiction 8.Be ironic 9.Use metaphors 10.Use rhetorical questions

OFF RECORD STRATEGIES (Cont…..) 11.Be ambiguous 12.Be vague 13.Over-generalize 14.Displace H 15.Be incomplete, use ellipsis.