1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
Advertisements

Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
December 2014 © 2014 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
Council for Economic Education. City Hall is the center of government in your city or town. It is a very important place! The Mayor, City.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
Southern Apache County Community Health Survey Spring 2003.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey September 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office Nov 6, 2003.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 2006 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office February 10, 2006.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
Banister Research and Consulting Inc Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 13, 2014.
ADDRESSES BASIC NEEDS Affordable housing is available to community residents Figs Percentage of people age 60+ who want to remain in their current.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
Troy community opinions analytical report
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis
  ADDRESSES BASIC NEEDS Affordable housing is available to community residents • Figs Percentage of people age 60+ who want to remain in their.
McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures June 22, 2017
DirectionFinder® Survey
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Triangle Survey Results
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Summary of Findings May 26, 2009
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
2017 Charlottesville Parks and Recreation Survey: Findings
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Methodology 327 interviews with Cotati voters
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Municipal Government.
Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents
Focused General Plan Update Status Report & Visioning Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia Beach. Presented by: Jeannine B. Perry, Sr. Project Director Continental Research Associates Inc.

2 Background  Benchmark survey in 1995  Similar q’naires – primarily satisfaction ratings  Telephone method (Sun. - Thurs. evenings)  Min. of 6 attempts to reach each household  Sample size 500 adults (randomly selected)  Margin of Error: ±1% to ±4.4% (worst case) 2007 Methodology  15 min. survey – Was well-received  Calls made Oct. 30 th – Nov. 28 th (used CATI system)  Highly scientific procedures  Report incl. surveys since 1995 (most recent = 2005)  Detailed analysis given to Dept. of Mgt. Svcs.

3 Participants rated their satisfaction with 31 City services & characteristics: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, or Very Dissatisfied For simplicity: Very Satisfied + Satisfied = “Satisfied” Many localities define excellence as an 80% (or higher) level of satisfaction. In Virginia Beach, 21 of the 31 City services rated above the 80% threshold.

4 Items With a Satisfaction Level Above 95% % Satisfied* Fire Department99.4% Public libraries98.0% Paramedic & Rescue Squad97.6% 911 Emergency Telephone Center97.3% Recreation centers96.8% Appearance of municipal bldgs. & facilities96.2% Overall appearance of the City95.6% Parks95.2% * “Very Satisfied” + “Satisfied”

5 Items With Satisfaction Between 90% and 95% % Satisfied # of opportunities for volunteerism94.4% Courtesy of City employees94.2% Police94.0% Museums/aquarium/cultural activities94.0% Work performance of City employees93.7% Horticultural & Agricultural services91.1% City trash collection & recycling services90.4%

6 Items With Satisfaction Between 80% and 89% % Satisfied Overall appearance of your neighborhood89.4% Public school system86.2% Drinking water & sanitary sewer services86.0% Public beaches85.7% Mental health & mental retardation svcs.83.2% The job opportunities in Virginia Beach*80.2% *Improved since 2005.

7 Items With Satisfaction Below 80% (Issues/Areas to Address??) % Satisfied Efforts to combat gang activity/violence 75.8% The City’s work with other area communities 75.0% Services for needy or homeless families* 73.4% Rain water drainage* 70.8% Efforts to protect natural resources 64.6% Maintenance of existing City roads & bridges 64.3% Opportunities citizens have to share their ideas 59.0% Planning & construction of new City roads 51.5% Planning for residential development 50.5% Traffic flow 36.0% *Improved since 2005.

8 % Using Some City Services (Past 12 Mos.) % Who Said “Yes” Visited a Va. Beach public library and/or used the library from home/work 81.6% Visited a City park 79.8% Visited a Va. Beach public beach 79.6% Had contact with or observed Public Safety (Police, Fire, Rescue Squad) 73.4% Went to a museum, the aquarium, or a cultural activity in Va. Beach 67.4% Contacted the City by phone/Internet/in person 63.6% Been to a Va. Beach rec center 58.6% (n=500)

9 % Who “Agreed” With Each Statement % Who Agree”* Va. Beach is a good place to live 96.0% For the most part, I can conveniently access City services 95.4% My neighborhood is a safe place to live 93.2% Va. Beach, in general, is a safe place to live 92.8% Overall, I receive a good value for my City tax dollar 74.2% I know how to inform the City about the way I feel on important issues 70.6% * “Strongly Agree” + “Agree”

10 What one thing could the City do to make you a more satisfied resident? 2007 I think everything is fine 8.8% Reduce the traffic flow problems16.8% Lower my taxes/fees12.2% Improve the roads/build more/finish sooner 7.4% Stop or minimize the growth 4.2% Listen more to citizens/do more surveys 3.6% Plan better for growth/development 3.2% Create/preserve more green spaces 3.0% Reduce crime/Enhance public safety 2.8% We need more public transportation 2.8% Improve the schools (more funding/smaller classes) 2.6% More street sweeping/litter control 2.0% Cost of living is too high (utilities/housing) 2.0% … etc. …(n=500)

Profile of Respondents Avg. # of years lived in Va. Beach20.0 yrs. % who reported being homeowners78.0% % who reported being renters22.0% Avg. age (head of household)46.3 yrs. % who reported being registered voters81.2% % who are White74.2% % who are African American21.2% % who are Hispanic 1.2% % from another ethnic background 3.4% % with yearly household income of $100, %

12 T-Tests Comparing 2007 to 2005 Nine Items Showed Significant Improvement Over 2005  Fire Department services  Paramedic & Rescue Squad services  The 911 Emergency Telephone Center  Recreation centers  The appearance of the City’s municipal bldgs./facilities  City parks  Job opportunities in the City  Services for needy or homeless families  Rain water drainage ***There were no significant declines since 2005!***

13 In Closing…  Satisfaction scores were quite high, indicating that residents are quite pleased with the quality of life in Virginia Beach  We’ve itemized 10 areas where additional focus may be warranted (traffic, roads, growth, drainage, gangs, etc.)  96% are satisfied with the appearance of the City  96% believe Virginia Beach is a good place to live  95% believe they can conveniently access City services