1 TX SET Update to RMS March 14, 2007. 2 Drop to AREP Changes PUCT Project 33025 oOne of TX SET 2007 goal is to evaluate approved Rulemakings and determine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
Advertisements

Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
1 RMS Update to TAC March 30, RMS Activity Summary 1.Change in Drop to AREP Process 2.Market Processes for Solar and Wind Generation 3.Market.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
RMSUpdate November 4, 2004 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
1 RMS TAC Update March 6, Texas Test Plan Chair; Bill Bell Centerpoint Energy Vice Chair; Leanne Hayden Centrica COMET Chair; Terry Bates TXU.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Renewable Generation Interconnection Ken Brunkenhoefer Distributed Generation Consultant
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
Distributed Generation Task Force November 29, 2007 TAC Report.
Profiling Working Group March 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting March 14, 2006.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
Retail Metering Working Group Progress Report 04/15/09.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
LMP-G Policy Issues Matrix LRISv2 Subgroup July 23 rd,
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
LMP-G Policy Issues Matrix LRISv2 Subgroup July 23 rd,
DRG Slides for PWG Update to COPS. 2 Highlights from the DGTF Recommendation - 3 Small DRG applies to generation less than 50 kW –Profiling is applicable.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
1 TX SET Update to RMS November 12, RMGRR Activity RMGRR065 – Disconnect and Reconnect for Non-Payment Updates and Corrections – –Normal Timeline.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
December 9, 2015 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 13,
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Retail Market Update August 6, Load Profile Guides In accordance with section § (e) (3) and PUCT Project 25516, Load Profiling and Load Research.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board January 17, 2006.
1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, May 9, Elimination of the Drop to AREP o RULEMAKING TO AMEND COMMISSION SUBSTANTIVE RULES CONSISTENT WITH §25.43,
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 4, 2003.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Market Rules Overview Topics in this lesson...  Introduction to Market Rules Public Utility Regulatory Act PUCT Substantive.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Module 1 From Bundled Utilities to Current Market Design.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
Retail Metering Working Group Progress Report 08/15/07.
-- Presentation from PWG -- Profile ID Assignment and Annual Review Process November 17, 2005.
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Distributed Generation Task Force
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Settlement Timeline Workshop
January 10, 2017 Retail Market Subcommittee (RMS) Update to TAC
June 7, 2016 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS
March 1, 2016 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
PA Supplier Workshop Net Metering September 10, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

1 TX SET Update to RMS March 14, 2007

2 Drop to AREP Changes PUCT Project oOne of TX SET 2007 goal is to evaluate approved Rulemakings and determine their Transactional and Market impacts to current processes: oRULEMAKING TO AMEND COMMISSION SUBSTANTIVE RULES CONSISTENT WITH §25.43, PROVIDER OF LAST RESORT (POLR) Project was approved on February 16, 2007 oOne of the many changes in this project included the elimination of the Drop to AREP process (814_10 TX SET transaction)

3 Drop to AREP - What is Changing? oEffective March 8, 2007, Competitive Retailers shall no longer send 814_10 Drop to AREP transactions to ERCOT. oIn response to the adopted rule: oTX SET will submit to RMS our recommended changes to Protocols Sections 15 and 19 concerning the 814_10 Drop to AREP transaction. oTexas Test Plan Team has eliminated the Drop to AREP Test Script from CR Market Certification testing effective with Flight 0407 oMarket Metrics Working Group will continue to provide quarterly reports of the number of 814_10 Drop to AREP transactions received by ERCOT. Re-evaluation of 814_10 Drop to AREP reporting will be conducted once the new Performance Measures rule is introduced.

4 Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices In an effort to conserve on their electrical usage by using environmentally safe devices, Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on their residence and in some cases the premise may even be their place of business. With solar panels/cells these types of devices have shown to reduce the amount of usage that is recorded at the billing meter, as well as, based upon the amount of consumption may generate an output of electricity onto the utility’s distribution line.

5 New Technology Creates New Issues TX SET discussed some of the following issues at a high level and came to the conclusion that these issues are BIGGER than TX SET: –Currently TX SET 867_03 Monthly Usage does not support negative values in usage –Some TDSPs will not allow a bi-directional meter to run backward – NET Zero because their distribution wires were utilized for both the input and the output of the electricity. –Guidance is needed from Competitive Metering/Metering Working Groups to determine what type of metering equipment should be utilized for this type of application. –The REP of Record may want to know exactly how much electricity was generated by the Retail Customer’s equipment to pass onto the customer any savings information.

6 New Technology Creates New Issues –Does the CR expect to be Settled on the electricity generated? If yes, what are the Settlement implications and how would the information be communicated? –Do the current Protocols support Solar and Wind producing equipment? –Could this type of premise require a change or addition to the Load Profile Assignment because of the frequent fluctuation of usage? –Where should this issue belong because it may cross into both the Retail Market and Commercial Operations Subcommittees? –Are there Wholesale implications as well?

7 New Technology Creates New Issues These customers are more than likely to be residential or small commercial type premise where the customer is looking for cost savings to their bottom line while in that process of trying to benefit from tax incentives, we would hope that these ESI IDs would not be treated as a Load Acting As a Resource (LaaR) because: –The customer would encounter additional cost that was not expected or anticipated that would more than dilute their cost savings from installing the solar and wind device. –LaaR require special metering equipment at a cost that is traditionally higher than a standard meter. –This type premise may be required to obtain a QSE while their generation, if and when produced, is very minimal to none at times based upon their individual consumption for that billing period.

8 Conclusion TX SET was unable to provide a proposed solution (long-term or short-term) due to the numerous issues that needed to be discussed and resolved by various parties. We would like to request that the Market discuss these issues to determine a Market process where all can enjoy the benefits of solar and wind devices, especially the Retail Customer.

9 Questions ?