Doc.: IEEE 802.15-16-0236-01-003e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission May 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Drafting of IEEE e.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE e Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Subframe.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2011 Xing Tao (SIMIT/WSNIRI), Khanh Tuan Le (TI) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2010 Kuor Hsin Chang, Monique Brown (Elster Solutions, M.B. Brown Consulting) Project: IEEE P
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE /244r0 May 2001
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to MIMO CES]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> 12/8/2018
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Errors in a] Date Submitted: [18 March, 2010]
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<author>, <company>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to CID#133]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to CID#133]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comment Resolution Suggestions Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolutions for SC-PHY Modulation and Spreading.
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to MIMO CES]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Proposal for Radio Specification Comments.
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to cid#1064]
doc.: IEEE <doc g>
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<author>, <company>
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dimming support solutions of PHYs in IEEE
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
<author>, <company>
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #42, #44 and #45 for HRCP-SC PHY] Date Submitted: [14 March 2016] Source: [Keitarou Kondou] Company: [Sony Corporation] Address 1 : [1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo ] 1 : Re: [In response to e-lb114-consolidated-comments] Abstract:[This document presents a resolution on comment #42, #44 and #45 for HRCP-SC PHY in e-lb114-consolidated-comments.] Purpose: [Resolving the comment #42, #44, #45] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributors acknowledge and accept that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 2 Comment #42 and the resolution CIDPageSub- clause Line #CommentProposed Change a Should the Frame Length field indicate the MAC frame length not excluding FCS? Correct as needed Accept and change the description as same as that used in the OOK part -Current The Frame Length field shall be an unsigned integer equal to the number of octets in the MAC frame body of a regular frame, excluding the FCS. -Corrected The Frame Length field shall be an unsigned integer equal to the number of octets in the MAC frame body including frame payload(s), MAC subheader(s) in the aggregated frames, and FCS(s), but not including the frame header and the preamble.

doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 3 Comment #44 and the resolution CIDPageSub- clause Line #CommentProposed Change a Considering P2P communication with equal- basis transceivers, allowable EVM for a transmitter seems to be too strict. Referring to page 33 in IEEE e, target EVM balance between transmitter and receiver should be revisited. Target EVM for a transmitter and a receiver has to be confirmed for deciding allowable EVM for a transmitter. Accept, target EVM has been confirmed as below and no change is needed. -description Eb/N0 is used at the graph on page 33 in IEEE e. Current values of EVM are derived from SNR* required for the criteria. In case of MCS3, where 16QAM and rate-14/15 LDPC used, threshold for frame-error rate of 8 % is 10.5 dB in Eb/N0 and 15.6 dB in SNR. SNR (dB) = Eb/N0 (dB) + 10*LOG10(number of coded bits per symbol) The Number of coded per symbol is 4 * (14/15) * (56/64), which is 5.1 in dB, for MCS3 evaluation(the last factor comes from pilot insertion). Current EVM value for MCS3 is –22 dB. If same amount of noise is assumed for both transmitter and receiver, noise level of the received signal shall be –19 dB. Then the margin shall be 3.4 dB and seems to be appropriate. *SNR is defined here as the ratio averaged signal power to error power at the received signal.

doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 4 Comment #45 and the resolution CIDPageSub- clause Line #CommentProposed Change a There are many possible situations where EVM will be measured via a build-in antenna at 60 GHz band. Proposals for measurement methods should be considered, either in this spec or in a separate conformance test plan. Insert text as follows: when measuring EVM by capturing a transmit signal via an antenna, frequency response of the antenna can be compensated. Revised. The current draft refers the measurement method defined at 15.3, but it’s not clear whether compensation for antenna response or not. A sentence will be added after the line 24 on page 99 as follows (underlined is added) The EVM of a compliant transmitter shall be measured and calculated as defined in and shall not 23 exceed the values given in Table for the indicated mode. Note that this requirement assumes a conducted measurement. - Description in from line 22 on page 310 (15.3RevA-DF2) The error vector measurement shall be made on baseband I and Q data after recovery through an ideal reference receiver system. An ideal receiver is a receiver that is capable of converting the transmitted signal into a stream of complex samples at sufficient rate or more, with sufficient accuracy in terms of I/Q arm amplitude and phase balance, DC offsets, and phase noise. It shall perform carrier lock, symbol timing recovery and amplitude adjustment while making the measurements.

doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 5 END