1. doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0465-00-0010 Submission May 2015 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Proposed Resolution for Comments R89 and R223 from Charlie Perkins Date Submitted: May 31, 2015 Source: Soo-Young Chang (SYCA), Jaebeom Kim (Ajou Univ.), and Jaehwan Kim and Sangsung Choi (ETRI) Company: SYCA, Ajou Univ. and ETRI Address: Voice: +1 530 574 2741, E-Mail: sychang@ecs.csus.edu and kimj@etri.re.kr Re: Abstract: Proposed comment resolution for two comments from Charlie Perkins Purpose:To suggest comment resolution for Comments R89 and R223 from Charlie Perkins Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Slide 1 Soo-Young Chang (SYCA) et al

2. doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0465-00-0010 Submission May 2015 Soo-Young Chang (SYCA) et al Comment R89 Commenter –Charlie Perkins Related text in draft –5.2.2.1, Page 26, line 1 Comment –Is "Inactive time aware airtime" different than "link occupancy"? Proposed Change –If it means the same, use "link occupancy“. Slide 2

3. doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0465-00-0010 Submission May 2015 Soo-Young Chang (SYCA) et al Proposed Resolution (Reject) Explanation –The result from the corresponding expression in Page 26 is the value of a metric representing an expected transmit time, after taking link errors and inactive time of the PAN into consideration. –Therefore it is more appropriate to keep this term rather than to change to “link occupancy”. Proposed Change –No change Slide 3

4. doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0465-00-0010 Submission May 2015 Soo-Young Chang (SYCA) et al Comment R223 Commenter –Charlie Perkins Related text in draft –6.2.9.1, Page 67, line 25 Comment –Not clear why MCO determines Intermediate Address Mode Proposed Change –Insert clarifying text. Slide 4

5. doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0465-00-0010 Submission May 2015 Soo-Young Chang (SYCA) et al Proposed Resolution (Accept) Proposed Change –Simply delete the text, “If MCO is enabled, the Intermediate Address List is set to 1).”. Slide 5