KCMP Quarter 3 Indicators 1, 2, 4, and 20 November - January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Supervision Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 15 – General Supervision 20 – Timely and Accurate Data.
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
What do the Federal Regulations Require?. The federal regulations have been revised to include a number of new systems/reports that are intended to drive.
Purpose of Instruction
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
VESID UPDATES Patricia J. Geary 9/15/06.  Behavioral Interventions  IDEA Federal Regulations  State Assessments  State Performance Plan  Levels of.
Campus Improvement Plans
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Pouring a Foundation for Program Improvement with Quality SPP/APR Data OSEP’s message regarding Indicators 1, 2, 13 and 14 - data collection and improvement.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
2013 Office of Special Education (OSE) Fall Forum Tuesday, November 4, 2013  10:15 am – 11:45 am  Ballroom E Jayme Kraus Data Analyst, Performance Reporting.
 AKA CIPP  Evaluators: Elaine Carlson and Tom Munk  Assist in summative evaluation of the center  Helped develop standardized logic model  Helped.
School Improvement Plan Guidance Presented by the School Improvement And Educational Data Warehouse.
Working with Your RRC to Improve Secondary Transition Education Presented by: Lucy Ely Pagán, NERRC and Jeanna Mullins, MSRRC.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
KCMP SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS Winter Reporting Period.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Program Update For Compliance PBMAS (Performance Based Monitoring) –Moved from Stage 4 w/on-site TEA visit to Stage 1B ( 3 indicators caused.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
12/15/2015LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children Mid Year Update Leslie County Schools.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
District Annual Determinations IDEA Part B Sections 616(a) and (e) A State must consider the following four factors: 1.Performance on compliance.
YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Significant Discrepancy in Suspension and Expulsion Rates in West Virginia: Barriers to Implementation of Discipline Policy and Procedures November 15,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
1 Assuring the Quality of Data from the Child Outcomes Summary Form.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
11/23/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.
What is “Annual Determination?”
New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
OSE-EIS MAASE February 2010
SPR&I Regional Training
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Strategies for Reducing Habitual Truants
Year 1 Results May 2012 NDPC SD and WVDE
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
December Count Data Entry Training
State and Local Data Use for Policy, Practice, and Program Improvement
Presentation transcript:

KCMP Quarter 3 Indicators 1, 2, 4, and 20 November - January

Basic Format Brief history of the indicator since the SPP began Trend data State level insights or issues Current year’s data Current APR activities Any issues from this past year? New activities? Any changes from OSEP? State level issues

Indicators 1 and 2 Graduation Rate Drop Out Rate

7/6/2016 Kentucky Graduation Rates for Students with Disabilities 2004 to 2008

Drop Out Rates for Students with Disabilities 2004 to 2008

7/6/2016 Indicator 1 and 2 Activities DECS will collaborate with the KDE Dropout Prevention Branch to coordinate efforts toward dropout prevention in districts not meeting the state targets for Indicators 1 and 2 Action Steps: DECS and the Dropout Prevention Branch will: 1.Conduct data analysis to determine root causes and needed improvement strategies for districts not meeting the state target for Indicators 1 and 2 2.Develop an action plan for providing assistance to districts not meeting the state target for Indicators 1 and 2 3.Require districts not meeting Indicator 1 and 2 targets to implement the action plan

7/6/2016 Indicator 1 and 2 New activities? Any changes from OSEP? State level issues

7/6/2016 Indicator 4 Suspension Rates Over 10 Days Suspension Rates – Comparison of Students with Disabilities to Students without Disabilities

7/6/2016 Suspension Rates Over 10 Days

7/6/ Suspension Rates over 10 days

7/6/2016 Suspension Rates

7/6/2016 Suspension Rates

7/6/2016 Indicator 4 Activities DECS and Special Education Cooperatives will provide training and consultation/ technical assistance for data analysis and action planning to districts whose data indicate a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions/expulsions of students with disabilities Action Steps: 1.DECs will develop a protocol for root cause analysis for use by districts 2.DECS will require districts with significant discrepancies whose trend data has not improved over time to: a.Develop an analysis of suspension /expulsion data at the individual student level, using the DECS root cause analysis protocol. The district will submit its analysis and an action plan to DECS for approval b.Secure training and technical assistance based on the district’s root cause analysis for the implementation of positive behavior interventions and supports at targeted schools in the district c.Submit prescribed documentation to the Special Education Co-op and DECS on an ongoing basis

7/6/2016 Indicator 4 New activities? Any changes from OSEP? State level issues

7/6/2016 Indicator 20 Timely and Accurate Data

7/6/ State Data

7/6/ State Data

7/6/ State Data

7/6/2016 Indicator 20 Activities DECS will convene regular meetings of the Special Education Advisory Group for Infinite Campus (SEAGIC) to provide input, direction and guidance for special education data requirements in the student information system. Action Steps 1. SEAGIC will meet 3 to 4 times annually 2.SEAGIC will develop and revise special education data collection requirements including development of data standards to reflect changes in federal and state laws to improve the student information system 3SEAGIC will be representative of local district, state, and vendor staff

7/6/2016 Indicator 20 Activities DECS’ APR work group will review APR Indicators and data Action Steps DECS data manager will: 1. Generate data for each indicator 2.Work with DECS staff assigned to indicators to provide, explain and discuss data needs 3Analyze data at the state and district levels for consistency, accuracy, and appropriate decision- making with regard to compliance

7/6/2016 Indicator 20 Activities DECs will provide technical assistance to districts for submissions of required data to KDE and DECS Action Steps DECS data manager will: 1.Review local district data submission 2.Work with districts to identify and correct data errors

7/6/2016 Indicator 20 New activities? Any changes from OSEP? State level issues

7/6/2016 Quarter 3 Schedule November 1? – Districts receive KCMP documents November Coop Network Meeting – Review Indicators December Coop Network Meeting – Review Data December 30?? – KCMP documents due to Coops January Coop Network Meeting – Review Root Causes and Activities January 30?? – Regional Reports due to DECS