EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Training for Teachers and Specialists
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Peninsula School District
Texas Evaluation and Support System
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Systems for Moving Forward
Why change from PDAS? PDAS 1997
ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Edgewood T-TESS Updates for
Teacher Evaluation Process
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Introduction to TDES for Recalled Teachers
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS Overview for Teachers Today we’re going to talk briefly about the new State recommended evaluation systems for both teachers and campus administrators.

Timeline Timeline Pilot Year, 2014-2015 in selected districts Refinement Year, 2015-2016 in selected districts Statewide Rollout, 2016-2017 Student Growth requirement, 2017-2018 This is the timeline for the new system’s development and ultimate roll-out statewide.

Texas Teacher Standards 149.001 – Purpose: The standards identified in this section are performance standards to be used to inform the training, appraisal, and professional development of teachers. This slide just shows that there are 6 Texas Teacher Standards. This evaluation system, specifically the rubric, will further define best practice for each of these standards. This gives us all in the state a common language to talk about quality teaching and learning.

T-TESS Purpose Formalize what highly effective educators already do Develop habits of self-assessment, reflection, and adjustment Collaborative, supportive cultures This is straight from the training but defines the purpose of the evaluation system as a whole. I would just read each of these bullets or have teachers read and discuss in partners.

Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Full Appraisal Cycle Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Pre-Conference Formal Observation (45 minutes) + walkthroughs and additional observations Post-Conference End of Year Conference

Annual Appraisal Process

Four Domains of the T-TESS Rubric This slide is a picture of the rubric organization. 4 Domains - Planning, Instruction, Learning Environment, Professional Practices and Responsibilities 16 Dimensions Important Note: The top 3 Domains are evaluated each observation. The bottom Domain (PPR) is only evaluated at the end because it is a year long process.

Example of the T-TESS Rubric This is the stylized version of the rubric. We’ve placed a copy of the full rubric in the shared folder for you to work with this spring.

T-TESS Rubric Domain We’re just talking through what to call each part of the rubric 4 Domains Planning Instruction Learning Environment Professional Practices and Responsibilities

T-TESS Rubric Dimension 16 Dimensions

Descriptors T-TESS Rubric Multiple Descriptors for each Performance Category - These descriptor further define what teachers should know and be able to do.

Performance Levels T-TESS Rubric 5 Performance Levels I would also talk about the word proficient here and really drive home that the committee defined Proficient as “rock-solid” teaching. We would all love for the term proficient to go away BUT it is a statutory term. We have to reframe our understanding of this term because as we dive into the rubric we’ll see what it takes to be Accomplished and Distinguished. We’re ALL going to work to improve our practice to move to the left but Proficient should be understood as quality teaching. REMEMBER: This system is about growth! It is okay to be wherever you are on the rubric...it’s just not okay to be content to stay there. This helps us ALL to focus on improvement even if we’re already good!

Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Goal setting and professional development planning allows teachers to make decisions for professional growth, and allows teachers the opportunity to self- assess and reflect on their practices, performance, and student data. Allows the teacher and the appraiser to work together to establish goals and a plan of professional development for growth.

Pre-Conference Meeting The overall purpose of the pre-conference is for the appraiser and teacher to mutually discuss the upcoming lesson observation with a focus on the interrelationships between planning, instruction, the learning environment, and student outcomes. Pre-Conference meeting will take place prior to an announced observation.

Observations and Walkthroughs -A formal, announced 45-minute observation will take place after the pre- conference. The formal observation will cover Domains 1-3. -Additional observations may take place at the discretion of the appraiser and may occur at the discretion of the appraiser that will not require a pre-conference meeting and are not required to be scheduled in advance. -In addition to observations, walkthroughs will also take place at the discretion of the appraiser. Walkthroughs are not prescheduled or announced.

Post Conference Meeting The overall purpose of the post-conference is to provide teachers opportunities to self-reflect on the execution of their lessons with guidance and support from their appraiser. Results from the post-conference are used to inform and guide teacher’s future practices and growth.

End of Year Conference During the End of Year conference the teacher and appraisers will discuss final scores for domains 1-3, review evidence for Domain 4 and discuss next year’s goals and professional development.

Performance Levels T-TESS Rubric 5 Performance Levels I would also talk about the word proficient here and really drive home that the committee defined Proficient as “rock-solid” teaching. We would all love for the term proficient to go away BUT it is a statutory term. We have to reframe our understanding of this term because as we dive into the rubric we’ll see what it takes to be Accomplished and Distinguished. We’re ALL going to work to improve our practice to move to the left but Proficient should be understood as quality teaching. REMEMBER: This system is about growth! It is okay to be wherever you are on the rubric...it’s just not okay to be content to stay there. This helps us ALL to focus on improvement even if we’re already good!

T-TESS Performance Levels The 'Proficient' performance level is representative of a 'Rock Solid' teacher. With T-TESS , goal is to move beyond proficient to performance at the accomplished and distinguisehd levels. Everyone in the school community is a public learner. The ultimate outcome is improved student achievement.

T-TESS Orientation Teachers will receive the official TTESS Orientation during August Staff Development Week. Late hires will be trained as needed by campus administration.

https://teachfortexas.org/ Additional Resources Additional information and the T-TESS Teacher Handbook can be found on the Teach for Texas website at: https://teachfortexas.org/