SAB Vitality Committee Report Annette Reilly Arthur Keller February 4, 2014

Vitality Committee Purpose and Approach “Meet with sponsors to transmit best practices among them and to recommend reorganization of sponsors with diminishing workload” Approach: –Identify existing and potential new measures of vitality for sponsors –Identify indications of moribund or dysfunctional sponsors –Collect performance data for identified vitality indicators –Recommend changes in sponsor status if indicated Support strategic discussions to contribute to the vitality of SAB as a whole through identifying new projects or sponsor committees (working with Special Projects) Build the IEEE-CS brand as the SDO of choice. 2CPS Presentation to IEEE President 12 May 09

Vitality Indicators Productivity: Number of active revision and new projects, projects started, abandoned, completed before PAR expiration Engagement: Number of active working groups, number of working group and SC members, number of study groups, liaisons to other standards development organizations (SDO) and IEEE-CS TCs, extent of international participation, longevity of leadership, involvement of new leaders/members, involvement of major industry stakeholders and users Compliance: Operating within approved P&P (soon-all) Sustainment: Revision or stabilization of a portfolio of approved standards; use of strategic planning to identify new projects; relevance of standards to current technology –Not a major concern in 2014, but 62 of 286 projects will need revision or archiving in Vitality Committee Feb 14

Sponsor vitality data 4CPS Presentation to IEEE President 12 May 09 Sponsor CommitteeSponsor ChairPublished Standards = PAR Complete Stabiliz ed Rev, Am, Corrr PARS - In Dev, NesCom, Rev Com New PARS - in Dev, NesCom, or RevCom Incomplete and PAR expires 12/31/2014 WG with active projects P&P tillComments LAN/MAN (IEEE 802)Paul Nikolich with expiring PARs in sponsor ballot Software & Systems Engineering Paul Croll with expiring PAR on RevCom 3/14 agenda MicroprocessorPaul Eastman with expiring PARs in sponsor ballot Design AutomationStan Krolikoski /31/2016 Portable ApplicationsJoseph M Gwinn /31/2013pending AudCom approval, 3/14. Last project completed in Test TechnologyRohit Kapur /31/20181 with expiring PAR in RevCom, 1 in sponsor ballot Learning TechnologyTyde Richards /31/20181 with expiring PARs in sponsor ballot Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization/SAC: Marcy Stutzman /31/2015 Information AssuranceEric Hibbard /31/2017 Standards Activity BoardPaul Eastman Environmental, AV coding, D Storage SystemsOPEN [John Cole] /31/2018 Cloud ComputingSteve Diamond /31/2016 Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents Marc-‐Philippe Huget (Marc-­ /31/20171st project on NesCom 3/14 agenda Voting SystemsJohn Wack TOTALS Based on MyProject as of

Vitality observations Sponsor committees range from very large portfolios to start-ups with no completed projects –Both can be vital sponsors All current sponsors show some signs of vitality –Individual situations to be explored with SAB chair and sponsors Late-completing projects can have various causes –Lack of interested SMEs, contending WG interests, analytical WG members, lack of sponsor/SAB guidance on IEEE procedures Diminishing workload is not always a bad sign –Stabilized processes and systems vs relevance to current technology and methods –New standard development vs adoption of existing specifications 5CPS Presentation to IEEE President 12 May 09