Welcome! Please visit Our Wiki and download resources

What is ASW? And what in the world does it have to do with me?

Elementary and Secondary Education Act 1965

No Child Left Behind 2002

ESEA Waivers 2011

Race to the What? Race to the Top 2010

Basic Education Plan 1985

NC Standard Course of Study Common Core State Standards – English Language Arts (and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects) – Mathematics NC Essential Standards – Arts Education – Career and Technical Education – English Language Development* – Guidance* – Healthful Living (Health & Physical Education) – Information and Technology* – Science – Social Studies – World Languages

North Carolina Arts Education Essential Standards 2012

What is Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy? And what does it have to do with ASW?

Introductions: ASW Team Arts Education Christie Lynch Ebert Slater Mapp AP/IB Sneha Shah-Coltrane David Brooks Healthful Living Burt Jenkins World Languages Ann Marie Gunter Coordinator Jen DeNeal

Welcome: ASW Questions Please use post-its notes to capture your questions today, individually and from your team. Periodically, your table will compile the questions, and unanswered ones from that section will be addressed.

ASW 101

Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students. Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. NC Professional Teaching Standards

5 Rating Categories Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

Principal’s Input Confirm Teacher Participation

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teaching Context Screen shot

Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct. Principal’s Input

ASW Questions Have 1 person compile your post-it notes with questions from the previous section Listen carefully! Only unanswered questions will be addressed to save time...

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Class Selection Beginning in 2014 – 2015, the online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.

Class & Objective Selection Mid-late October Online Platform selects classes, and then teachers can choose objectives. Note: Teachers who are on a semester schedule will have classes selected for 1st semester and then later 2nd semester.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Objectives: Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives. Objective Selection

Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: PDPs teacher meetings Principal’s Input

Class & Objective Selection Mid-late October Online Platform selects classes, and then teachers can choose objectives. Note: Teachers who are on a semester schedule will have classes selected for 1st semester and then later 2nd semester.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): a)A specific objective b)Sample type Individual Student or Whole Class c)Collection Method d)Samples from Point 1 and Point 2 5 Timelapse Artifacts

The Teacher may choose: Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples Collect and keep 2 work samples: for each class member for a specific objective at 2 separate points in time OR Sample Type

The Teacher may choose: Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 work samples that represent the entire class for a specific objective at 2 separate points in time Sample Type

Pre Test Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Collection Method Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting:

Pre Test Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljd Collection Method → File Size Up to 10 MB per file!

Late October - late May Teachers will compile student work samples. Note: Teachers on a semester schedule will finish collecting 1st semester work samples by the end of December and will upload their artifacts to the Online Platform. Then, they will repeat the class selection and objective choosing processes for 2nd semester classes. 5 Timelapse Artifacts

Time passes Teachers Collect Work Samples for Timelapse Artifacts

ASW Questions Have 1 person compile your post-it notes with questions from the previous section Listen carefully! Only unanswered questions will be addressed to save time...

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

TA 1 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students. Student Selection

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling. Student Selection TA 1

Principal’s Input The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.

Student Selection & Upload Evidence Late May-early June Teachers with individual student work samples will have the Online Platform select 3 students at random for uploading. Then, teachers will upload student artifacts and submit completed Evidence Collections to the Online Platform.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Context for 1 st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? Upload Evidence How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8 th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest. 3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow. 4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

Context for 2 nd work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? Upload Evidence How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8 th grade Health Education Class containing 32 students three class days after instruction began. In this video, the student shows proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The student has the proper body position, on his knees next to the victim. 2. The force of the compression is generated from the hips and applied in a vertical direction. 3. The hands are positioned with an interlocking grip. 4. The heel of the bottom hand has been placed on the sternum.

Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. Upload Evidence Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples Timelapse Artifact Upload Evidence

Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Timelapse Artifact Upload Evidence

All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform as the teacher’s Evidence Collection for the school year. TA 3 Student TA 3 Student TA 4 Student TA 4 Student TA 5 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class TA 1 Student TA 2 Whole Class Upload Evidence

Student Selection & Upload Evidence Late May-early June Teachers with individual student work samples will have the Online Platform select 3 students at random for uploading. Then, teachers will upload student artifacts and submit completed Evidence Collections to the Online Platform.

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 Blind Review ED M

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Blind Review

If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 M Blind Review M

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3 rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. M Reviewer #3 Blind Review E

2-Step ASW Process Review These will be explained in detail in later modules. #1 Evidence Collection Checklist #2 ASW Quality Rubric Blind Review

Summer 2015 Content area specialists complete the review process. Blind Review Qualifications Application Training

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth M = Meets Expected Growth E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth Evidence Collection Rating Form: TA 1TA 2TA 3TA 4TA 5 Does Not MeetMeetsExceeds D D D D DM M M M ME E E E E D D D D EM M M M EM E E E E D D D D MD M M M MM M E E E D D D E EM M M E ED E E E E D D D M ED D M M MD M E E E D D D M MD M M M ED D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E Receive Rating

D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth M = Meets Expected Growth E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: Evidence Collection Rating Form : TA 1TA 2TA 3TA 4TA 5 Receive Rating DMMME

Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating a Receive Rating a Does Not MeetMeetsExceeds D D D D DM M M M ME E E E E D D D D EM M M M EM E E E E D D D D MD M M M MM M E E E D D D E EM M M E ED E E E E D D D M ED D M M MD M E E E D D D M MD M M M ED D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E

Fall 2015 Teachers receive their Standard 6 ratings for Receive Rating

An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6 Effectiveness Status 3 Years of Combined Data for Standard Year 1Year 2Year 3 Standard

66 Contribute to Academic Success 6 Year Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Year Meets Expected Growth Standard Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data: Does Not Meet (Year 1) Meets (Year 2) Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for Meets Expected Growth Effectiveness Status Only for 2014 – 2017: Best 2 out of 3 years of data

Effectiveness Status for DevelopingProficientAccomplishedDistinguished Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership Standard 2 Establish Environment Standard 3 Know Content Standard 4 Facilitate Learning Standard 5 Reflect on Practice Standard 6 Three year growth data X X X X X Best 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth Principal Role

In Need of Improvement Effective Highly Effective Any rating lower than proficient Proficient or Higher on Standards 1-5 Accomplished or Higher on Standards Demonstrate Leadership 2 Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Standards Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth Effectiveness Status for Contribute to Academic Success (3 yrs. of data)

Effectiveness Status for DevelopingProficientAccomplishedDistinguished Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership Standard 2 Establish Environment Standard 3 Know Content Standard 4 Facilitate Learning Standard 5 Reflect on Practice Standard 6 Three year growth data X X X X X Best 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth Effective Principal Role

ASW Questions Have 1 person compile your post-it notes with questions from the previous section Listen carefully! Only unanswered questions will be addressed to save time...

Team Planning Time

Wiki Walkabout

5 Online Training Modules August - ASW Overview September - Year 1 Planning, Capturing 2 Points in Time October – November - Context and ASW Review Process Important Forms Frequently Asked Questions Visit the ASW Wikispace here: ASW Wikispace Public wiki - No need to join!