C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TDC130: High performance Time to Digital Converter in 130 nm
Advertisements

GSI Event-driven TDC with 4 Channels GET4
20/Oct./2000 CF IEEE NSS 2000 at Lyon,France 1 An MWPC Readout Chip for High Rate Environment Introduction ASIC Structure & Fabrication ASIC Evaluation.
A. Kluge January 25, Aug 27, 2012 Outline NA62 NA62 Specifications Specifications Architecture Architecture A. Kluge2.
On-Chip Processing for the Wave Union TDC Implemented in FPGA
Specific requirements for analog electronics of a high counting rate TRD Vasile Catanescu NIHAM - Bucharest CBM 10th Collaboration Meeting Sept 25 – 28,
SKIROC New generation readout chip for ECAL M. Bouchel, J. Fleury, C. de La Taille, G. Martin-Chassard, L. Raux, IN2P3/LAL Orsay J. Lecoq, G. Bohner S.
1 MTD Readout Electronics J. Schambach University of Texas Hefei, March 2011.
18/05/2015 Calice meeting Prague Status Report on ADC LPC ILC Group.
Front-end electronics for Time Projection Chamber I.Konorov Outlook:  TPC requirements  TPC readout options  Options for TPC FE chips  Prototype TPC.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
U niversity of S cience and T echnology of C hina Design for Distributed Scheme of WCDA Readout Electronics CAO Zhe University of Science and Technology.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
The GANDALF Multi-Channel Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC)  GANDALF module  TDC concepts  TDC implementation in the FPGA  measurements.
CARIOCA (Cern and RIO Current Amplifier). The CARIOCA chip has 8 binary output, therefore DIALOG has 16 PCH as input channels and has up to 8 LCH as output.
P. Baron CEA IRFU/SEDI/LDEFACTAR WORKSHOP Bordeaux (CENBG) June 17, Functionality of AFTER+ chip applications & requirements At this time, AFTER+
S.Manen– IEEE Dresden – Oct A custom 12-bit cyclic ADC for the electromagnetic calorimeter of the International Linear Collider Samuel.
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
P. Baron CEA IRFU/SEDI/LDEFACTAR Meeting Santiago de Compostela March 11, A review of AFTER+ chip Its expected requirements At this time, AFTER+
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
65 nm CMOS analog front-end for pixel detectors at the HL-LHC
CERN, 18 december 2003Coincidence Matrix ASIC PRR Coincidence ASIC modifications E.Petrolo, R.Vari, S.Veneziano INFN-Rome.
L.Royer – Calice Manchester – Sept A 12-bit cyclic ADC dedicated to the VFE electronics of Si-W Ecal Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Pixel detector development: sensor
SKIROC ADC measurements and cyclic ADC LPC Clermont-Ferrand Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN Calice/Eudet electronic meeting Orsay June.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Presented By Mythreyi Nethi HINP16C.
S. Bota – Calorimeter Electronics overview - July 2002 Status of SPD electronics Very Front End Review of ASIC runs What’s new: RUN 4 and 5 Next Actions.
CBM-TOF-FEE Jochen Frühauf, GSI Picosecond-TDC-Meeting.
CERN PH MIC group P. Jarron 07 November 06 GIGATRACKER Meeting Gigatracker Front end based on ultra fast NINO circuit P. Jarron, G. Anelli, F. Anghinolfi,
Mai 31th 2011 Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting1 ETD meeting Test setup : Activities in Bari, Univ of Maryland and at Orsay Test setup : Activities in Bari,
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
1 D. BRETON 1, L.LETERRIER 2, V.TOCUT 1, Ph. VALLERAND 2 (1) LAL ORSAY - France (2) LPC CAEN - France Super Nemo Absolute Time Stamper A high resolution.
J.Maalmi, D.Breton – SuperB Workshop – Frascati – September 2010 Electronics for the two-bar test. D.Breton & J.Maalmi (LAL Orsay)
1 Status Report on ADC LPC Clermont-Ferrand Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN Calice/Eudet electronic meeting London 2008.
End OF Column Circuits – Design Review
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
DCH FEE STATUS Level 1 Triggered Data Flow FEE Implementation &
A 12-bit low-power ADC for SKIROC
Front-end Electronic for a neutrino telescope : a new ASIC SCOTT
Journées VLSI-FPGA-PCB Juin 2010 Xiaochao Fang
V. Tocut, LAL/IN2P3 Orsay H. Lebbolo LPNHE/IN2P3 Paris
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
ETD meeting First estimation of the number of links
Alternative FEE electronics for FIT.
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
ETD meeting Electronic design for the barrel : Front end chip and TDC
KRB proposal (Read Board of Kyiv group)
From SNATS to SCATS C. Beigbeder1, D. Breton1,F.Dulucq1, L. Leterrier2, J. Maalmi1, V. Tocut1, Ph. Vallerand3 1 : LAL Orsay, France (IN2P3 – CNRS) 2 :
PID meeting SCATS Status on front end design
Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting
DCH FEE 28 chs DCH prototype FEE &
Ongoing R&D in Orsay/Saclay on ps time measurement: a USB-powered 2-channel 3.2GS/s 12-bit digitizer D.Breton (LAL Orsay), E.Delagnes (CEA/IRFU) Séminaire.
Hellenic Open University
Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting
Christophe Beigbeder/ ETD PID meeting
EUDET – LPC- Clermont VFE Electronics
Fernando J. Barbosa F1TDC Status Update Hall D Collaboration Meeting Indiana University – Bloomington, IN May 20-22, 2004 Fernando J.
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
PID electronics for FDIRC (Focusing Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light) and FTOF (Forward Time of Flight) Christophe Beigbeder and Dominique.
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
V. Tocut, LAL/IN2P3 Orsay H. Lebbolo LPNHE/IN2P3 Paris
The ATLAS LAr. Calibration board K. Jakobs, U. Schaefer, D. Schroff
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
ETD parallel session March 18th 2010
Ongoing R&D in Orsay/Saclay on ps time measurement: status of the USB-powered 2-channel 3.2GS/s 12-bit digitizer D.Breton & J.Maalmi (LAL Orsay), E.Delagnes.
Electronics for the PID
Orsay Talks Christophe : General questions and future developments.
Phase Frequency Detector &
Presentation transcript:

C.Beigbeder, D.Breton, M.El Berni, J.Maalmi, V.Tocut – LAL/In2p3/CNRS L.Leterrier, S. Drouet - LPC/In2p3/CNRS P. Vallerand - GANIL/CNRS/CEA SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

Requirements for the FDIRC electronics chain:  Time resolution ~ 200 ps rms.  Signal measurement PMT signal: rise time ~ 700 ps Dynamics ~15 + Dispersion ~3:  Input amplitude range from 2mV to 100 mV  Count rate per channel up to 500 kHz (due to background)  Trigger rate up to 150 kHz.  Minimum distance between triggers of about 50 ns.  Dead time < 2%.  Immunity to SEU. The electronics chain: Requirements for the TDC:  Step: 200 ps  Time data format over 31 bits covering the trigger latency  Hit time resolution: < 100 ps rms  Count rate capability: 1 MHz /channel with readout dead-time < 2%  Instantaneous dead time: < 50 ns  TMR on state machines and registers SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012 PIF chip Final CAT chip

The conceptual design is very simple which makes it easy to use:  Data-push architecture  Time range is programmable : (default mode is 2-word) 1 word => 15 bits => covers 6 µs 2 words => 31 bits => covers 416 ms 3 words => 47 bits => covers 7 hr 30 min 4 words => 53 bits => covers 20 days  SCATS master clock ranges from 100 to 200 MHz (for DLL and counter)  SCATS readout clock is selectable : internal (½ frequency of the input clock) external (up to 100 MHz)  SPI bus for slow control  Chip is fully operational at power up. Front-end Part Time coding 15 to 53 bits Readout Part State Machine Slow ctrl TMR Regs SPI 16-inputs 16-bit data + address and control bits SPI bus Clock for front-end Clock for readout Sel SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

Fine measurement inside a clock period Correcting logics for DLL and Gray counter matching Readout dead time contribution Instantaneous dead time contribution: minimum distance between input hits IEEE NSS Anaheim Nov 2112

 Technology: AMS pure CMOS 0.35µm  Area: 23.4 mm² Readout FSM

Test Board synoptics Two types of measurements are required to characterize a TDC:  Fine measurements inside the clock period, performed with external pulser DLL histogram, DNL, INL and resolution  Measurements linked to the clock synchronous logics and to data readout Dead time depending on hit rate and readout dataflow capability Scats test board Pulse generator: Agilent HP8110A Test software

Hit distance = 42.2 ns Hit distance = 42.0 ns The input dead time of the chip is the minimum distance between two consecutive hits which can be detected by SCATS: ~ 43 ns SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

Hit distance = 43.0 ns on channel 3 and 4. Front-end clock = 160 MHz, readout clock = 80 MHz. The derandomizers get full and hits are missing: this is the readout dead time. The Full-FIFO flag is latched and it is readable by slow control. Some hits are missing SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

In order to characterize the hit dead time, we use an individual exponential hit distribution on each channel (centered on 1, 2 or 4 MHz). Digital frames are generated inside the FPGA of the test board. Readout dead time:  One-word 4 MHz < 2%  Two-word 1 MHz  < 2 MHz  < 2 4 MHz  16 %  Three-word 1 MHz  18 2 MHz  20%  Four-word 1 MHz  40 % SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

2 channels are pulsed asynchronously with respect to the DLL clock. INL: 40ps rms  DNL: 12ps rms  DLL step 0 is higher but it can be tuned via internal DAC (still to be done) SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012

The DLL performance is linked to the layout topology. Going from ch0 to ch15, we get closer to the clock receiver and Gray counter which are located at the bottom of the chip. DNL summary for the 16 channels   All channels are very similar (rms ~ 12ps) INL summary for the 16 channels   Shape is uniform but INL increases towards the bottom of the chip (rms goes from ~ 30 to ~ 45 ps)  INL pattern is stable and can be corrected by software thanks to a simple addition to hit time

Example of time difference measurement between ch8 & ch10 and ch8 & ch12. Each have different DLLs. Differential resolution is ps rms  ~ 80 ps rms for single hits. After INL correction, it becomes 88ps rms  ~ 63 ps rms for single hits.

Differential time resolution between two channels that share the same DLL is 70 to 82ps rms after INL correction  50 to 60 ps rms for single hits

 Counter correction (0/31) in the 2-Word Mode: problem understood and will be corrected. There are two options 1- Increasing the instantenaous dead time by 6.25 ns (only in the 2- word mode). 2- Detecting the error (dedicated flag) and correcting it outside of the chip.  Channel 0 priority : is not a problem at 1MHz but must be understood and corrected.  Data superposition at high rates between ch11 or Ch13 and one of the channels 0, 1 or 2 : this error can be detected and rejected. It seems to happen rarely but this has to be studied more precisely and on different chips. SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Rome December 2012

 The first version of the SCATS TDC is functional.  Single hit resolution is ~ 80 ps rms, ~ 60 ps rms after INL correction  Readout dead time is < 2% in the 2-word mode with 1 MHz exponential input on each channel  DNL is ~ 12 ps rms  INL is < 45 ps rms but can be corrected by software  The next version will: correct the few bugs and implement TMR on state machines embed a low walk discriminator, a peak detector and an analog pipeline to associate charge and time. SuperB -Collaboration Meeting – Frascati December 2012