Action Research Proposal Presentation Jamie Burkley EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller Date: March 22, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A MERICAN A CCOUNTING A SSOCIATION Faculty Diversity and Initiatives Section Mission The primary forum for the enhancement and support of diversity in.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Developing the Learning Contract
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
UniLOA The University Learning Outcomes Assessment The Center for Learning Outcomes Assessment, Inc. ©
How to Write a Research Proposal Detroit Medical Center Nursing Research Council.
David Garr, MD Executive Director South Carolina Area Health Education Consortium Associate Dean for Community Medicine Medical University of South Carolina.
Making Your Assessments More Meaningful Flex Day 2015.
Illinois State University Master Plan Office of the Vice President of Finance and Planning Campus Master Plan Overview of Update Process.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
Milo Bail Student Center A Report from Service Learning Academy May 10, 2004 UNO Strategic Planning.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
The Role of the Office Institutional Research and Program Assessment at Baruch College Presented by: John Choonoo, Director Jimmy Jung, Assistant Director.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
2010 Student Satisfaction Survey. Survey Background Created to address the “Student Satisfaction” Performance Measures Developed and updated by the Student.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration: Collecting Community Engagement Data Susan Connery, Director of the Feinstein Community Service Center Christopher.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
EDUCATIONAL COUNSULTANCY SERVICES
Departmental Assessment Process.  The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides.
Center for Educator Recruitment, Retention, & Advancement From Recruitment to Retention: A Continuum That Works!
AQIP Quality Checkup Visit Six Sigma Annette McIver Project Coordinator Human Resource Development/ SkillsMAX March 14, 2008.
Nursing Care Makes A Difference The Application of Omaha Documentation System on Clients with Mental Illness.
C onceptual Framework A ssumption University May 8-9, hrs. Bancha Saenghiran, f.s.g., Ph.D. Student Affairs.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Student Development The Gateway to … Opportunities Accomplishment Financial Solutions Student Success Achievement Student Life.
Supporting CSUCI Enrollment Goals Cindy Derrico, Director Housing and Residential Education.
Learn from the past, prepare for the future, live in the present Thomas S. Monson Re-focus, Re-invest and Re-invent.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
The Kentucky Career Pathways Initiative Oregon Pathways Academy II April 12, 2007 Shauna King-Simms Director, College and Career Transitions Kentucky Community.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
Cultural Voices: Perceptions of Faculty, Staff and Students A Cultural Study funded by the Equal Opportunity Panel University of Kentucky.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
1. OPERATIONS EXPERT Provides area manager/ franchisee with practical recommendations and support to improve the efficiency of daily operations 1. Has.
Guidelines and Policies for an Effective Online Learning Program: Meriden Public Schools 10/3/2011 Stewart,JEL
Combatting Tobacco Use Among Vermont College Students A project based at Education Development Center Newton, MA Project Director: Karen L. Zweig, J.D.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Program Services Coordinator Transfer Center Hiring Justification Soraya Sohrabi.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Impact of Mentorship Programs to Influence African-American High School Student’s Perception of Engineering By Cameron Denson University of Georgia Under.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
The Head Start Program Health Screenings By: Lillian Henderson.
The Head Start Program Health Screenings By: Lillian Henderson.
Action Research Proposal By: B’Nekia Curtis EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller.
TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.
University Career Services Committee
How to Write a Research Proposal
AdvancED Accreditation Timeline for Huntsville City Schools
Thesis Proposal Presentation
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Action Research Proposal Presentation Jamie Burkley EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller Date: March 22, 2015

Contents Area of Focus Explanation of Problem Research Questions Literature Review Intervention/Innovation Population Ethics Timeline Data Collection/Analysis

Area of Focus The purpose of this study is to better improve student development and academics while attending college by improving student housing and other campus facilities

Explanation of Problem Current campus facilities lack certain aspects to accommodate basic campus needs Health and counseling center needed for students to combat illnesses and promote mental stability Campus housing needs to be more sustainable for the future and updated to keep up with new technological advances in society

Research Questions 1.What facilities can the school build/improve on in order to help improve the students’ college experience? 2.Will new residence halls and other campus facilities improve on student retention? 3.How will the building of new campus facilities be funded?

Review of Literature Quality facilities on campus is crucial to adding value to the institution Facilities enhance the schools marketability and strengthens and facilitates in the recruitment of quality staff and students 60% of students in a recent study stated that the quality of the buildings on campus influence their decision to attend a school

Intervention/Innovation Planning IRB permission to conduct research Participant consent Data collection through surveys, formal interviews and focus groups will begin Data analysis and presentation to board Building Upon approval, selection of building site as well as design and construction team Process completion will take approximately months Satisfaction survey at end of building

Population 20 on-campus students: 10 male & 10 female – 6 Caucasian, 6 Black, 4 Hispanic and 4 Asian 2 Housing administrators – Director of Housing & Area Coordinator of Housing Assistant Director of Retention Services Director of Student Affairs 2 Faculty Members

Ethics Philosophy: to help students achieve their goals in a safe and clean environment Social Principles: Equality in the campus community help improve and increase their learning abilities Harm: a campus that is sustainable and updated promotes student academics and campus safety, help the school maintain admissions and recruitment goals, while also keeping up with current trends Protection: Consent will also be obtained form all students and study participants can at any time withdraw from the study without any prejudicial effects to their education Bias: Outside opinions will be an integral part in receiving unbiased opinions while conducting surveys and interviews

Timeline The total time of the process would be an estimated months to completion

Data Collection Research QuestionsData Collection ToolWhy this tool? Justify its use in your study. How does it match with what you are attempting to find and to measure? Time Frame: How and when data will be collected 1.What facilities can the school build/improve on in order to help improve the students’ college experience? Student Survey/ Questionnaire The survey/questionnaire method matches this question because we get to know firsthand from the students what they really want. It will allow the researcher to collect a large quantity of data in a short time. Student surveys will be administered through a secure account and submitted through an interface. The timeline for completion of survey is two weeks 2.Will new residence halls and other campus facilities improve on student retention? Student Focus Group A focus group will allow students to talk freely amongst each other about what will keep them in college until they obtain a degree. The teacher researcher can pose questions to the group and encourage all participants to respond. Study participant focus group will be conducted over the course of two weeks in a off campus meeting room 3.How will the building of new campus facilities be funded? Structured Formal Interviews The interviews will consist of higher administration being asked questions about the funding of new facilities, where the money will come from and what does the administration need to do to make sure this process is done well. Formal interviews will be conducted in an off campus meeting room and the process will take approximately three weeks to complete.

Data Analysis Researchers will use Spearman Rho and Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient to assess instrument reliability and validity. All data collected will be collated and organized into a useable format using measures of central tendency: mean, median and mode and percentages. This phase of the intervention will take approximately10 to12 weeks.

References Carroll, J. X., Carnaghi, J. E., Lempfert, T. J., & Johnes, K. H. (2003). What Comes First: The Program or the Facility? New Directions for Student Services, Falk, C. F., & Blaylock, B. K. (2013). STRATEGICALLY PLANNING CAMPUSES FOR THE “NEWER STUDENTS” IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Trinklein, A. I. (2009, April 1). Sustainability and Residence Hall Construction. Journal of College & University Student Housing, Vidalakis, C., Sun, M., & Papa, A. (2013). The quality and value of higher education facilities: a comparative study