C ALIFORNIA C OASTAL C OMMISSION S OUTH C ENTRAL C OAST D ISTRICT S LIDE 1 Malibu Lagoon & Surfrider Beach Project Site Malibu Civic Center Malibu Creek Pepperdine University

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE 2 Appellant’s Residence Project Site Civic Center Way Pacific Coast Highway

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE 3

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE 4 Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA) City’s approval of the project does not conform to the policies of the LCP with regards to minimum buffers from wetland environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA) because the City failed to require an adequate buffer between wetland habitat and the project area.

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE ft. Environmental Sensitive Habitat Area Buffer Existing Driveway to be Improved

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE 6 Additionally, the appellant outlines five claims in support of the appeal expressing concerns regarding how certain environmental issues relating to the handling and storage of hazardous chemicals and human health were addressed in terms of their compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and the adequacy of the City’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

I TEM Tu10a S LIDE 7 1.The degree of factual and legal support for the local government’s decision that the development is consistent or inconsistent with the certified LCP or with the public access policies of the Coastal Act; 2.The extent and scope of the development as approved or denied by the local government; 3.The significance of coastal resources affected by the decision; 4.The precedential value of the local government’s decision for future interpretation of its LCP; and 5.Whether the appeal raises only local issues, or those of regional or statewide significance.