Assessing Teaching Through Critical Reflection and Evidence to Encourage Renewal Phyllis Blumberg - University of the Sciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
1 ASSESSMENT: THE SCOTTISH PERSPECTIVE ‘Assessment is for Learning’ Carolyn Hutchinson Qualifications, Assessment and Curriculum Scottish Executive Education.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Exit Portfolio of Your name Area of Licensure Completion date 2011.
Assessing Student Learning
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
School-based Support Services EMB Language Learning Support Section.
The UW-La Crosse Teaching Portfolio Colloquia 5/21/2008  150 Wimberly  9 A.M. - NOON Teaching Portfolio Workshop Collect, Select, Reflect, and Peer Review.
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment You may not have been previously exposed to self and peer assessment within education. This is a great opportunity.
Created By: Ms. Leah Wendt.  1. Teachers know the subjects they are teaching. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
 Powerful tool for teaching and learning  Students become thoughtful judges of work  Reduce time evaluating work  Easy to use and explain ~Heidi.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
New Scheme Teachers A Stress Free Accreditation!?! NSW Geography Teachers Association Workshop at Cockatoo Island 23 March 2007 Elizabeth Riley Covenant.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Introduction to SoTL Patrick Ashton Yvonne Zubovic September 23, 2005.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
 Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Identifying Assessments
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
PERFORMANCE-BASED- ASSESSMENT JUAN PABLO RAMIREZ LUISA FERNANDA GODOY.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
PEER ASSESSMENT AND SELF- ASSESSMENT. Peer assessment  The practice is employed to save teachers time and improve students' understanding of course materials.
Managing a Classroom for Science Learning. Reading Assignment Chapter 12 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
Assessment for Learning. Today’s Essential Questions What is formative assessment? How do changes in teacher-generated questions impact teaching and learning?
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
Integrating HOTS in Literature Instruction Overview of Literature Program ( Adapted from Online course) After reading this presentation, teachers will.
Performance Assessments. What are performance assessments? “Performance assessment is a general term used to describe assessments that require students.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Uib.no UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Your Classroom Robert Gray, PhD University of Bergen 17 November 2015 Program for.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
Stage 1 – Desired Results Level I – Quarter 1 – Art History Established Goals Enduring Understanding: The Elements & Principles of Design are found throughout.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
What Difference Can Portfolio Make in Radiographer Work Practice
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Where We Are and Where We Want to Be
Are Your Educational Programs Learning-Centered? Can You Measure This?
MENTEP, Brussels Janet Looney
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Professional Teaching Portfolio
FEEDBACK Dr. Mohammed Moizuddin Khan Associate Professor.
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Revamping the student opinion instrument for faculty
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Teaching Through Critical Reflection and Evidence to Encourage Renewal Phyllis Blumberg - University of the Sciences

We will assess teaching Using a formative, self-assessment model to encourage renewal discuss how this assessment model employs evidence- based best practices of teaching describe how to leverage different strategies to inform a robust teaching enhancement process employ a self- assessment rubric with your teaching

Evidence-based best practices of teaching define essential elements of effective teaching Command of subject matter Plan to promote student learning Provide feedback to students Provide students reflection opportunities Ensure successful learning experiences Assess students consistently

First, a reality check: Does your institution use these essential elements: 1.to assess teaching? 2.use such assessment results as a basis for improving teaching?

Personal reflection, then share within small groups Personal reflection: How does your institution assesses teaching? Do your teaching assessment tools reflect all nine of these nine characteristics of effective teaching? (Characteristics listed on handout) Then share what you found

Concerns with current teaching assessment practices Development of new assessment model Useful in all contextsHierarchical to promote renewal Implications Teachers try to satisfy studentsDoes not foster teaching improvements System currently used to evaluate teaching mostly uses Student evaluationsLimited peer observations

A Hierarchical Assessment of Teaching Model Rigorous study of your teaching Evidence-based literature or your own data Critical reflection

Critical reflection = better teaching Reflection Critical review Documentation

Examples of sources of data for your critical review and reflection: see handout page 2 Self- your own perceptions Students Peers/ chair

Teach based upon educational literature in your own discipline Teach based upon educational literature in higher education See last column of page 2 handout Collect your own data about teaching and learning effectiveness Evidence-based literature or your own data

Based on own insights, observations Test hypothesis Get IRB approval Rigorous data collection Pre, post test design 2 groups- comparison of 2 different interventions Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Rigorous study of your teaching

How can you use evidence from these different strategies to self-assess your teaching for renewal? Rigorous study of your teaching Evidence-based literature or your own data Critical reflection

Consider all essential elements of effective teaching Rigorous study of your teaching Evidence-based literature or your own data Reflect Critically Consider all essential elements of effective teaching

How can we leverage all of these different strategies to inform a robust teaching assessment process?

Complete Hierarchical Assessment of Teaching Model: 5 levels 1. Not using productive teaching practices 2. Summarize what others have said without reflecting critically 3.using data from many sources 4. Use evidence- based literature or own data 5. Rigorous study of teaching

From model to self-assessment rubrics 5 levels on model = criteria levels on self- assessment rubrics Essential aspects of teaching → each separate aspectis assessed on separate rubric page Full set of rubrics given in Blumberg, 2014 Rubrics format like a multiple choice item- see p 3 of handout

Individually rate your own teaching on the rubric page provided Refer to handout page 2 Sources for Documentation of Quality of Teaching for All Teaching Contexts to support your self-assessment If you have time: Write a rationale for your rating Provide evidence to support your teaching Any questions as you rate yourself? How can insights you gained about your teaching promote renewal?

Using rubrics fosters the closing of the assessment loop Am I teaching effectively? Consider essential aspects of teaching Critically self- reflect on these aspects of teaching Use evidence- based decision making Put what I learned, into action

In small groups share your insights from using this rubric page: Was this an effective way to assess one aspect of your teaching? Can you think of any ways to improve your teaching after completing this rubric?

Goal to improve student learning to increase teaching effectiveness? How can you use this model and the rubrics