PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

MDAW 2013: DCH & MBK.  Realism  Idealism  Liberalism  Marxism  Critical Theory(s)
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
Liberalism Central Assumptions and Propositions View of history: progressive change possible – Material: prosperity through technological progress, economic.
The Prisoners’ Dilemma and IR theories International Relations.
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
International Relations Grand Debates
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Several Realisms.
International Relations I
What are the issues important for domestic order? 4.
Chapter 5 Power, Conflict, and Policy
Plan for Today: 1. Wrap-up of points from Sagan & Waltz debate. 2. Evaluation of decisionmaking approaches. 3. Introduction to constructivism.
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Topics Today: Neorealism and Other Contemporary Realism 1.Completing introduction to neorealist principles. 2.Introduction to another version of contemporary.
2.2. The Liberal Challenge Learning Objectives: Understand how Liberals describe global politics Identify the Liberal view of power Compare and Contrast.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Constructivism in I.R..
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism.
Liberalism and the Study of Global Politics Learning Objectives: Understand how Liberals describe global politics Identify the Liberal view of power Compare.
Levels of Analysis.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
Theories of International Relations- Liberalism Robert Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence (1977)  The liberal conceptualization.
International Relations
International Relations
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO IN THIS CLASS? What three big questions (units) will we study? – Why do countries do what they do? When/how do states work together,
International anarchy could be best defined as: Chaos Multilateralism No world government Government by the United Nations No world government.
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
One Republic—Two Americas?
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Theories in International Relations: Neo-Liberalism
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
International political economy Political determinants of international economics How do changes in intern.distr.of power impact the international trade.
Liberalism. Introduction Liberalism – Historical alternative to realism Promotes peace in the international system through set norms, procedures and institutions,
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Introduction to International Relations International Security Prof. Jaechun Kim.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Idea-Based -isms.
Connecting Themes: 5th Grade Focus Four Areas of Study History Geography Civic/Government Economics.
X_UTgc5vQY X_UTgc5vQY.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
International Relations
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
The Frontier of IPE: the Evolution of Ideas Stephan Haggard Taiwan National University June 5, 2004.
The conflict over international Law. There is an ongoing argument over the extent to which international law and international institutions such as the.
WEEK 3 THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. Vocabulary Focus Positivism is a philosophic system which considers that truth can be verified only by facts.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
Realism vs Liberalism. What would you do? To be able to define the competing international relations theories of realism and liberalism.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
Themes in Social Studies
International Relations
International Relations
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism
International Regimes
System, State and Individual
CREATE REPLACEMENT FOR SYRIA EXERCISE AT START OF CLASS
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO
IR Theory No Limits Debate.

Presentation transcript:

PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms

Thus Far… On Friday, we discussed four realisms: –Classical Realism –Liberal Realism –Neorealism –Neoclassical Realism Other Realisms exist: –Defensive Realism (Security dilemma) –Offensive Realism (Expansion)

Today… Today, we will discuss some of the theories of International Relations based on Idealism: –Idealism Wilsonianism Soft Wilsonianism –Liberalism –Neoliberalism –Neoconservatism Hard Wilsonianism –Institutionalism

Idealism (Wilsonianism) States should make its domestic philosophy congruent with its foreign policy International law and norms are important in creating these foreign policies –League of Nations –Open diplomacy Ethical and moral considerations are more important than the national interest

Idealism (Wilsonianism) There exist universal values These include: –Democracy –Human rights –Free trade –Women’s rights –Minority protections

Liberalism State preferences (not capabilities) are the primary determinant of state behavior Liberalism allows for plurality in state actions –Culture determines actions Interaction between states is not limited to the political (security), but includes economic and cultural Absolute gains (preferred) can be made through co-operation and interdependence.

Neoliberalism A reaction to Neorealism, not a refinement of Liberalism Primary emphasis: –Absolute gains are more important to the state than are relative gains Congruent with Neoliberal economic theory –The freer the market, the freer the people States are interdependent –This interdependence decreases conflict

Neoconservatism Hard Wilsonianism Agrees with Wilson’s Idealism concerning the existence of universal values Agrees that these values include –Democracy –Human rights –Free trade –Women’s rights –Minority protections –And the like …

Neoconservatism BUT, it disagrees with Wilson’s methods As far as International Relations is concerned: –It is really just an admixture of Wilson’s Idealism and various Realisms using American ideals as the universal ideals As far as economic theory is concerned: –It is Neoliberal economic theory –Hence, “The freer the market, the freer the people”

Institutionalism In practice, the international system is not anarchic: –There exists an implicit or explicit structure which determines how states will act within the system The term ‘institution’ (same as ‘regime’): –Rules that determine the decision- making process –A set of explicit or implicit “principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures around which actors expectations converge in a given issue-area.”

Institutionalism In other words, institutions matter in explaining particular outcomes. Why? –They structure choices –They provide incentives –They distribute power –They define identities and roles However, one could easily argue that the ‘anarchic system’ is the regime/institution

Assignment Continue studying the news