Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 Years: A Comparative Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCREENING FOR DISEASE Nigel Paneth. THREE KEY MEASURES OF VALIDITY 1.SENSITIVITY 2.SPECIFICITY 3.PREDICTIVE VALUE.
Advertisements

MS&E 220 Project Yuan Xiang Chew, Elizabeth A Hastings, Morris Jinhui Zhang Probabilistic Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening and Vaccination.
Overdiagnosis as an extreme form of length-time bias Breast cancer screening as example Juan Gérvas, MD, PhD, Equipo CESCA, Madrid, Spain
Measuring Epidemiologic Outcomes
Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
Chronic diseases 1.Chronic diseases have long and variable preclinical phases. 2.The preclinical phase is that portion of the disease natural history during.
Meta-analysis of trials of radiotherapy in DCIS Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)
Conditional Probability and Screening Tests
Stage-specific survival of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer - evidence from the FOBT screening trials- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar.
Bayesian Network for Predicting Invasive and In-situ Breast Cancer using Mammographic Findings Jagpreet Chhatwal1 O. Alagoz1, E.S. Burnside1, H. Nassif1,
EPIB-591 Screening Jean-François Boivin 29 September
 Cancer is a group of more than 100 diseases that develop over time › Involve the uncontrolled division of the body’s cells  Cancer is the 2 nd leading.
Reliability of Screening Tests RELIABILITY: The extent to which the screening test will produce the same or very similar results each time it is administered.
Imaging examinations of breasts
March 10, 2014 NURS 330 Human Reproductive Health.
An Integrated Approach to Breast Cancer Control A flexible approach that can be adapted to national or local circumstances.
 Volunteer bias  Lead time bias  Length bias  Stage migration bias  Pseudodisease.
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
1 Lecture 6: Descriptive follow-up studies Natural history of disease and prognosis Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival curves Cox proportional hazards.
Screening and its Useful Tools Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Workshop.
Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is a disease in which malignant cells form in the tissues of the breast – “National Breast Cancer Foundation” The American.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Senior Statistician Per-Henrik Zahl, MA MD PhD
Breast cancer affects 1 in 8 women during their lives. 1 Population Statistics.
BC Cancer Agency CARE & RESEARCH Breast Cancer Mortality After Screening Mammography in British Columbia Women Andrew J. Coldman, Ph.D. Norm Phillips,
Date of download: 5/28/2016 From: Association Between Exposure to Low to Moderate Arsenic Levels and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort.
Date of download: 5/28/2016 From: Benefits and Harms of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Strategies: A Comparative Modeling Study for the U.S.
Appendix 2 Comparison of screening from age 20 and age 25 Table of harms and benefits.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 From: The Effect of a Lower Target Blood Pressure on the Progression of Kidney Disease: Long-Term Follow- up of the Modification.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Patients Older than 55 Years of Age Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(12): doi: /
Date of download: 6/1/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Regimens for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(6): doi: /M
Date of download: 6/1/2016 From: Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(9):
Date of download: 6/2/2016 From: Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9): doi: /
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Mortality Rates in Elderly Patients Who Take Different Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors after Acute Myocardial.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Chest Pain Relief by Nitroglycerin Does Not Predict Active Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(12):
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Sex, Age, and Birth Cohort Effects in Colorectal Neoplasms: A Cohort Analysis Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11): doi: /
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 From: Elevated Plasma Homocysteine Level Is an Independent Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease Events in Patients with Type.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 From: Systematic Review: Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Treatment Effect Modification by KRAS Mutations in Advanced.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 From: Biomarkers of Inflammation and Thrombosis as Predictors of Near-Term Mortality in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease:
Date of download: 6/25/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of the Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-up Screening Guidelines for Childhood Cancer Survivors.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Older Than 30 Years in.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 From: Variations in Mortality and Length of Stay in Intensive Care Units Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(10): doi: /
Date of download: 6/27/2016 From: Influence of Alternative Thresholds for Initiating HIV Treatment on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy: A Decision Model.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 From: Population Strategies to Decrease Sodium Intake and the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cost- Effectiveness Analysis.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 From: Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Medications to Reduce Risk for Primary Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 From: Predicting Future Functional Status for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults: The SUPPORT Prognostic Model Ann Intern Med.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 From: Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer Due to Mammography Screening: Results From the Norwegian Screening Program Ann.
Date of download: 7/1/2016 From: Does Utilization of Screening Mammography Explain Racial and Ethnic Differences in Breast Cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):
Date of download: 7/1/2016 From: Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 From: Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study Ann Intern.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 From: Sunscreen and Prevention of Skin Aging: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11): doi: /
Date of download: 7/6/2016 From: Comparative Effectiveness of Alternative Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screening Strategies: Model Estimates.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 From: Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review.
Date of download: 7/10/2016 From: β-Blockers in Congestive Heart Failure: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(7): doi: /
Date of download: 7/11/2016 From: Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Cohort Study Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(11):
Date of download: 9/16/2016 From: Fluorouracil plus Levamisole as Effective Adjuvant Therapy after Resection of Stage III Colon Carcinoma: A Final Report.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 From: The Changing Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States: Model-Based Predictions Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(3):
Date of download: 9/17/2016 From: Topical Treatment of Pressure Ulcers with Nerve Growth Factor: A Randomized Clinical Trial Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):
Date of download: 9/18/2016 From: Cost-Effectiveness of Distributing Naloxone to Heroin Users for Lay Overdose Reversal Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(1):1-9.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 From: The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care Ann.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 From: Personalizing Age of Cancer Screening Cessation Based on Comorbid Conditions: Model Estimates of Harms and Benefits Ann.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 From: Breast Cancer in Black Women Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(10): doi: / Age-specific.
Cancer prevention and early detection
Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(7): doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Benefits and Harms of Statin Therapy for Persons With Chronic Kidney DiseaseA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(4):
From: Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern.
From: Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 YearsA Comparative Modeling Study of Risk Ann Intern.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 5/31/2016 From: Tipping the Balance of Benefits and Harms to Favor Screening Mammography Starting at Age 40 Years: A Comparative Modeling Study of Risk Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(9): doi: / Schematic overview of simulated life histories and effect of screening. The italicized words in the descriptions below refer to the words outlined in the figure. Sojourn time is the duration of the preclinical, screen-detectable phase of the tumor, and lead time is the interval from screen detection to the time of clinical diagnosis, when the tumor would have surfaced without screening. Model D is a state transition model where potential benefit from early detection arises because of a stage shift. The natural history of breast cancer is modeled analytically by using stochastic models. The model assumes that breast cancer (invasive) progresses from a no-disease (S0) state to preclinical (Sp) state and to clinical (Sc) state. Some cases will continue to the disease-specific death (Sd) state. Death due to other causes is treated as a competing risk. The Sp state begins when cancer is detectable at screening, and Sc begins when cancer is diagnosed in absence of screening. For a given birth cohort, age-specific invasive breast cancer incidence rate and age-dependent sojourn time in Sp (published values) are used to estimate the transition probabilities from S0 to Sp. The transition probabilities from Sp to Sc are estimated on the basis of the age-specific breast cancer incidence rate. The other basic assumption is that any reduction in mortality associated with screening is from the stage-shift: that is, screen-detected cases have a better stage distribution with a higher proportion of cases in earlier stages. The stage distribution data for screen-detected cases are obtained from BCSC and directly incorporated in constructing breast cancer–specific survival. In addition, the lead time for screen-detected cases is treated as a random variable and is adjusted in constructing the breast cancer–specific survival for screen-detected cases. When cancer is diagnosed, a treatment is applied by age, stage, and estrogen receptor status and treatment reduces the hazard of breast cancer–specific mortality by age, stage, and estrogen receptor status. Model E is a microsimulation model based on continuous tumor growth. The natural history of breast cancer is modeled as a continuously growing tumor from onset of cancer (starting with a tumor diameter of 0.1 mm). The moments that events happen are determined by tumor sizes. The screening threshold diameter determines the moment that the cancer is detectable at screening, and the diameter of clinical detection determines when the cancer will be diagnosed in the absence of screening. Each tumor has a size (the fatal diameter, which differs between tumors) at which diagnosis and treatment will no longer result in cure given available treatment options. If the tumor is diagnosed (either on the basis of clinical presentation with symptoms or by screening) and treated before the tumor reaches the fatal diameter, the woman will be cured and will die of non–breast cancer causes (death from other causes). Variation between tumors is modeled by probability distributions of parameters. Screening might detect tumors at a smaller tumor size with a larger probability of cure (because the tumor has not yet reached the fatal diameter) than when the cancer is diagnosed in the absence of screening. Model G-E is an event-driven continuous time–state transition model. On the basis of birth cohort–specific incidence curves, the date at which progressive breast cancer will appear clinically (if ever) is sampled, and the stage, estrogen receptor, and HER2 are then sampled according to age- and period-specific stage distributions for these parameters. A sojourn time is sampled from an age-specific distribution, and the beginning of the sojourn period is defined as the clinical incidence date minus the sojourn time. If a screening event takes place during the sojourn period, it may detect the tumor with probability equal to the age-specific mammography sensitivity. If the tumor is screen detected, a stage at detection is sampled from a probability distribution calculated from the observed lead time, the distributions of dwell times in the clinical stages, and the stage at the clinical detection date. Whether clinically detected or screen detected, treatment is sampled from an age-, stage-, estrogen receptor–, and HER2-period–specific distribution of possible treatment regimens. Each particular treatment regimen reduces the hazard of breast cancer mortality by a ratio that depends on age and stage at diagnosis, estrogen receptor, and HER2. The date of breast cancer death (which may turn out to be after the date of death from other causes) is then sampled from the corresponding age-, stage-, estrogen receptor–, HER2-treatment regimen–specific survival function. Simulated women who do not have progressive breast cancer may have limited malignant potential (LMP) breast cancer. Breast cancer with LMP cancer is modeled as never being clinically detected and is never fatal. However, it is screen detectable for 5 years and, if screen detected, its stage is always ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). These screen-detected LMP DCIS are then treated the same way as progressive breast cancer diagnosed during the DCIS stage, but treatment has no effect on mortality because these LMP tumors are never fatal. Model W is a discrete-event, stochastic tumor growth simulation model. It simulates the natural history of breast cancer using a continuous time growth model for tumor size and a Poisson process for tumor extent with a randomly assigned growth rate from a population-level distribution. In the model, breast cancer is assumed to be a progressive disease arising in the in situ stage. Model W further assumes that a fraction of all tumors have LMP. This subtype is nonfatal, is limited in size and stage to in situ and early localized disease, and is predominantly detected by screening mammography. If undetected for a fixed dwell period, such tumors are assumed to regress. Breast cancer can be detected by 1 of 2 methods: breast imaging (screen detected), or by symptoms, where the likelihoods of detection are functions of a woman's age and tumor size. Upon detection, a woman will receive standard treatment and, depending on calendar year and woman- and tumor-level characteristics, may also receive adjuvant treatment. Treatment effectiveness, a function of treatment type, is independent of the method of detection and is modeled as a “cure/no-cure” process. Figure Legend: Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.American College of Physicians