Renewed Research for Patient Benefit Programme Ben Morgan, Interim Assistant Director RDS WM Workshop – 05 April 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting research off the ground
Advertisements

What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Developing the NCSI 2012 document: taking action to improve outcomes.
Research Design Service West Midlands RfPB Research Funding Application Workshop 28 th February 2014.
West Midlands Academic Health Science Network Mental Health Clinical Priority Event October 10 th, 2013 Peter Lewis Medical Director, Birmingham and Solihull.
Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluations
NIHR Research Design Service London Enabling Better Research Forming a research team Victoria Cornelius, PhD Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics Deputy.
“Best Research for Best Health” Andrew Riley Managing Director.
Welcome to the NIHR Peter Knight, Deputy Director Research Contracting, Information Intelligence and Stakeholder Engagement NIHR Trainees Meeting Leeds.
Implementation Research: Using Science to Guide Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices Brian S. Mittman, PhD Director, VA Center for Implementation.
NHS Services, Seven Days a Week Professor Sir Bruce Keogh National Medical Director NHS England.
Overview of NIHR Grants Department of Psychology University of Essex 24 rd March 2009 Mike Bellhouse RDInfo.
NICE in a changing world North East Leading Improvement for Health and Well- being programme Professor Mike Kelly Director, Centre for Public Health Excellence.
The National Institute for Health Research Research Design Service for the East of England 3 rd July 2015 Dr Doreen Tembo Research Adviser & Regional PPI.
Diabetes Programme Progress Report Dr Charles Gostling, Joint Diabetes Clinical Director October 2013.
Access to Clinical Expertise Steve Bain David Powell Jemma Hughes Paula Jeffries.
Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the NHS Dr Jacqueline Dutchak, Director National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care 16 January 2004.
Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre 5 July 2013 NIHR Programmes and topic identification Alison Ford, Senior Programme Manager.
Invention for Innovation (i4i) Bev Luchmun Industry Lead NISCHR
Research Roles in the NHS; Leadership and Capacity Building Dr Sally Fowler Davis- Clinical research/ Development Officer.
CSU Field Force December Overview NHS England published Transforming Participation in Health & Care in September 2013 Key commitment in guidance.
NHS | Presentation to [XXXX Company] | [Type Date]1 Senates - the interface with SCNs and AHSNs Nigel Acheson Medical Director NHS England (South)
Steph Garfield-Birkbeck Assistant Director NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton.
The New Public Health System
Research for Patient Benefit Overview of the programme in the West Midlands RDS West Midlands Exploring Research Funding Day 9 October 2013 Professor Scott.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
CCF PPI 2009 Active patient and public involvement in research applications National Institute for Health Research Central Commissioning Facility Jean.
Developing a National Critical Care Clinical Research Network: what’s in it for trainees? Paul Dark Associate Professor, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences,
The South East Wales Academic Health Science Partnership Dr Corinne Squire Manager SEWAHSP.
NHS England New Structure and Industry Engagement Richard Stubbs Head of Commercial and International Innovation NHS England.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
NIHR Research Design Service London Enabling Better Research Dr Caroline Burgess General Adviser 13 th November 2013.
Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Developing Sight Loss and Vision research questions: a funder’s perspective Anna Tallant Scientific.
The NIHR Research Design Service: supporting high quality grant applications Paul Ewings – Director RDS SW.
Patient And Public Involvement (PPI) in Research Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands (Keele University Hub)
Access to drugs, Reducing bottlenecks Matt Cooper Business Development & Marketing Director NIHR Clinical Research Network
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Open to all: the role of public involvement in health research Faculty of Health and Social Care, Open University, Wednesday 9 th December 2015 Simon Denegri,
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
NICE Policy Update Michael Rawlins Chairman, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London Emeritus Professor, University of Newcastle.
Simon Butler Centre Manager Funding Track record £7.8M.
Research for Patient Benefit Preparing a research proposal What makes a good proposal? Professor Scott Weich, Panel Chair.
Systematic Reviews for the NHS Professor Tom Walley Director of Systematic Reviews Infrastructure.
Public Health Research Programme Preventing the development and spread of Antimicrobial Resistance am - 2 October 2013 NIHR Public Health Research.
SECCN/SPACeR Critical Care Conference Introduction to the NIHR Research Design Service Research Design Service- South East Dr Bernadette Egan University.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Research Training Opportunities for Medical and Non-Medical Professionals NIHR Research Design Service East Midlands & University of Leicester Clinical.
NIHR Research Design Service Dr Grace Turner. Research Design Service NIHR Research Design Service Research Design Service (RDS) - Role - Eligibility.
Research for Patient Benefit Programme
The Health Services Research Centre and NAP5
NIHR funding and the Research Design Service South West
Help with developing research projects - Introducing the NIHR Research Design Service (RDS) Talked about ways into research and the next session looks.
Successful Grant Applications
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Managed Access to NIHR-funded Research Data
NIA-AABC May 9th, 2018 Webinar Lorenzo Refolo & Yuan Luo
How the RDS can support your application
An Introduction to the NIHR programmes
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
Experimental Medicine Challenge Grants Round 3
NIHR Research Design Service East Midlands
NICE resources for STPs: MECC
Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Cancer Symptom Trials (CST)
Overview of the Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Presentation transcript:

Renewed Research for Patient Benefit Programme Ben Morgan, Interim Assistant Director RDS WM Workshop – 05 April 2016

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Overview NIHR Research for Patient Benefit –Programme remit and new application process –Programme changes –Funding limits Preparing a research proposal –Common areas of feedback to applicants –Things to keep in mind when applying –Plain English summary guidelines –Costing applications

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) The RfPB Programme Response mode funding programme Grants may be: –Costed up to £350,000 –Feasibility applications costed up to £250k –More upstream studies costed up to £150k Three funding competitions per year Eight Regional Advisory Panels > 700 awards made to date totalling nearly £160m Overall success rate of ~22% (peer reviewed applications)

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) RfPB West Midlands Chair: Professor Scott Weich (Professor of Psychiatry, Warwick Medical School) Programme Manager: Bob Scott Project portfolio of 73 projects funded to date totalling £16.7 million WM success rate of 20% (peer reviewed applications)

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Research for Patient Benefit Supports high quality investigator-led research projects that address issues of importance to the NHS Supports qualitative or quantitative research that could: –Study the way NHS services are provided and used –Evaluate whether interventions are effective and provide value for money –Examine whether alternative means for providing healthcare would be more effective –Formally assess innovations and developments in healthcare –Assess feasibility of projects requiring major applications to other funders

Biomedical Research Centres Basic Research National Institute for Health Research This pathway covers the full range of interventions - pharmaceuticals, biologicals, biotechnologies, procedures, therapies and practices - for the full range of health and health care delivery - prevention, detection, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, care. Patient Safety Translational Research Centres Research for Patient Benefit Programme Grants for Applied Research Health Technology Assessment Invention for Innovation Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, Cochrane, TARs Development Pathway Funding Public Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research INVENTION EVALUATION ADOPTION DIFFUSION Efficacy & Mechanism Evaluation NHS Commissioning Board and Clinical Commissioning Groups Commissioning National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence Guidance on Health & Healthcare NHS Supply Chain Support for Procurement NHS Evidence Access to Evidence Innovation Academic Health Science Networks Patient Care Providers of NHS Services Clinical Research Facilities Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres Research Schools Horizon Scanning Centre Centre for Surgical Reconstruction & Microbiology Biomedical Research Units Medical Research Council The central role of NIHR research in the innovation pathway

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) RfPB Applications

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Funding Success Rates

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) RfPB Spend Mental Health 20% Cancer 14% Oral and Gastrointestinal 8% Neurological 7% Stroke 5% Cardiovascular 5% Musculoskeletal 5% Renal and Urogenital 5% Respiratory 6% Generic Health Relevance 4% Infection 4% Reproductive Health and Childbirth 3%

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) RfPB funding limits guidance Introduction of three funding tiers that aim to balance the probability of a proposal achieving patient benefit against its cost. Upper limit of £350,000 for research with a clear and close trajectory to patient benefit Soft ceiling of £250,000 for feasibility studies (in exceptional circumstances a well argued application could cost more) RfPB will also now consider research that is ‘higher risk’ (further from patient benefit), but should cost less than £150,000 (exceptions for proposals that might have more immediate patient impact can be made)

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Examples of £150,000 projects Observational studies Developing and refining interventions Developing new scales or outcome measures Exploratory studies that might provide insights into an intractable problem Additional follow up of patients in a completed clinical trial Post-market surveillance for unknown side-effects of a drug (Phase IV trials) Systematic reviews where the number of relevant studies is likely to be limited

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) New Investigators New investigators are encouraged to apply The team as a whole is assessed Relatively inexperienced lead applicant with sufficiently experienced and resourced co-applicants is fine RfPB is a good option for researchers looking for their first grant

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Challenges ahead Need to show efficient delivery of the programme Need to enhance engagement with the NHS by offering a more supportive assessment process

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) A renewed RfPB Two changes introduced from January 2016 (Competition 28) 1.Ten Regional Advisory Committees reduced to 8 Regional Advisory Panels (‘Panels’ to ensure consistent naming across NIHR) by merging regions 1.A new Stage 1 formative assessment to triage weak applications and offer advice/support to other applicants

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Regional Advisory Panels Merging of smaller regions for administrative efficiency South East Coast and South Central to merge: South East and Central Yorkshire and The Humber and North East to merge: Yorkshire and North East

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Regional Advisory Panels Ten regions Eight regions

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Two stage application process NIHR Standard Application Form (SAF) burdensome for ‘smaller’ RfPB grants Stage 1: Complete main sections of SAF for a formative assessment by Panel Stage 2: If invited, revise and complete rest of SAF for a summative assessment

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Stage 1 Panel assesses the main sections of application (no external reviews) – Names of applicants – Background/rationale for study – Research question(s) – Methods – Estimate of costs Is Panel interested in seeing full application? What could be done to improve it?

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Stage 2 If invited to Stage 2, Stage 1 application copied across to SAF Applicant revises Stage 1 sections in light of panel comments and completes other sections Applicants given 6 weeks to complete SAF for current round or defer until next Stage 2 application assessed by panel

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Timetable Details of new processes now available for applicants on website Competition 28 Stage 1 applications assessed in January 2016 Competition 28 Stage 2 applications (along with new Competition 29 Stage 1 applications) assessed in May 2016 Competition 30 Stage 1 to open shortly

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) How’s it going so far? All eight panels meetings occurred in late January On average, eight applications were invited to Stage 2 at each meeting Aim of 50% success rate at Stage 2 looks likely Outcomes sent to applicants much quicker (especially those who were declined at Stage 1) Initial feedback on application process and assessment has been positive from applicants and RfPB panel members

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) How can the RDS help? Highlight changes to the programme when advising applicants or at any workshops Particularly focus on the research question and the methods when advising (Stage 1) Advise of what would be required at Stage 2 (if invited) Potentially be ready to provide advice during Stage 2 submissions Provide feedback to the RfPB team

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) How can RfPB help the RDS? Programme Managers are always happy to take scope queries directly from the RDS or provide further detail on the application process Application guidance plus Word versions of both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 forms on the RfPB website Regional Programme Managers can attend away days and workshops etc, if required.

Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Questions?