 Collaboration Time A Steveston-London Model. What is Collaboration Time?  Collaboration Time is teacher driven.  It is when two or more staff members.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Mill Park Heights Primary School, 2010 Professional Learning Leader Melissa Corps.
Internal Content Specific Professional Development.
…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Joint Staff School Committee Training. Why do we need a JSSC? Provide orderly and professional means of improving educational programs, conditions within.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Cape May County Technical High School and Cape May County ETTC present Advisor/Advisee Program “Stepping Stones to Getting Started” Developed by Herb Siefken.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Continual Improvement Process Oregon Department of Education April, 2012.
Assessment Day 2012 Focus: Educator as Member of Communities Data: Alumni Survey Initial Programs Employer Survey Initial Programs Alumni Survey Advanced.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
High Schools That Work (HSTW) Implementation Plan Darrell Strong, Principal ; Lisa Dlabick, HSTW Coordinator.
January 11, A few FAQS from districts regarding the 2013 pilot.
Title 1 Program Parent Orientation Parkland School District Parkland School District
Classroom Assistive Technology Supports for Students.
Visual Art GPS Roll Out.  Student achieves standard  Project  Lesson plans  Fulton County Art Curriculum  GPS  National Standards.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Curriculum, Instruction, and Achievement Priorities (Presented to CCSD School Board - July, 2011)
The Rise Cohort A Dropout Prevention Program Tina Krabitz and Laura Peter Homewood Center.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Strengths Challenges  Helped to organize thoughts and activities  Gave better direction  Opportunity to share with fellow counselors and county officials.
November 26, :00am – 11:00am Monitoring Quality of Tutor Instruction
Technology Integration within Our School into the Community
New Jersey State Mandated Preschool Expansion December 8, 2008.
PROF190 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES. Questions to consider: 1. What is a professional learning community?
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Hammarskjold Middle School Supporting Students Programs.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
THE SCHOOL DAY AT DESS. Doha English Speaking School | Option 1 is for every class to finish one hour earlier the Key Stage 2 pupils (Years 3, 4, 5 and.
Personalization through Advisory Programs Kevin Cyr and Maureen Cohen February 2011.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
(Insert Fictional School Name Here) ADMS 618 Leadership for Educational Change and Improvement Jamilah Anderson Christian Nolde Chris Sumner.
Resources to Support the Cycle of Teaching and Learning Lisa McClintock Office of Teaching and Learning Support Division of Teaching and Learning New Jersey.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Summer Leadership Conference Summer 2017
PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school
Teacher Instructional Hours and Assigned Time
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Flex-Time The Gift of Time
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Bull Run Middle School Advisory Meeting, October 27, 2016.
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Curriculum Selection Process
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
CLASS Expectations MATERIALS
Presentation transcript:

 Collaboration Time A Steveston-London Model

What is Collaboration Time?  Collaboration Time is teacher driven.  It is when two or more staff members come together with the goal to increase student engagement, achievement and learning.  Collaboration focuses on improving teacher practice. The more effective a teacher is, the more a student will benefit.

Does Collaboration Time Exist in Other School Districts?  Yes. While the list below is not exhaustive, it shows other districts that utilize Collaboration Time.  Vancouver, North Vancouver, Surrey, Delta, Burnaby

Collaboration Time in Richmond  Currently, the only high schools that do not run Collaboration Time in Richmond are Burnett and Steveston-London.

Some Potential Collaboration Activities…  Working with others in curricular area to achieve consistency within the department.  Cross curricular initiatives.  Talking with other teachers about shared students.  Sharing resources.  Develop activities to make lessons more engaging.

…Some Potential Collaboration Activities  Bringing in professionals outside the school to present to a small group  Creating assessment documents  Combined activities between classes  Coordinating approaches to new curriculum

How Does it Differ From Pro D and Prep Time?  Prep Time  What we do for our own practice/our students  Personal  Pro-D  What we do with others  Once or over time  Professional  Collaboration Time  What we do in pairs/groups over time  Collegial

Examples of Student Improvement From Other Schools with Collaboration Time  Incorporation of an ELL rubric across all level allowed students to better understand their abilities, the criteria for improvement and areas of growth. This understanding allowed students and teachers to have targeted conversations around future directions.  Teachers were able to adjust instructional strategies and create accommodations for complex learners that resulted in an increase in student attendance, interest, on-task work and submission of assignments in math Apprentice and Workplace 11 class.  Career advisors have organized more visits so more info given to graduating students  Increased levels of reading and speaking in ELL level 1 & 2 students  Reduced negative behaviours and increased attendance for a student with significant behaviour concerns through targeted instructional support and assistive technology

Collaboration Time Frequency  Collaboration Time (CT) will occur 8 times throughout the year.  The CT days would fall on the first Tuesday of each month except in September where it would be the second Tuesday back after summer break.

Amount Of Class Time Missed *Student contact time will remain the same as students will still attend all of their classes on collaboration days (classes are just shortened)

Schedule For The Day Collaboration Time Schedule 8:25-9:40Collaboration Time (75 minutes) 9:45-10:45Block A 10:45-10:55BREAK (10 minutes) 10:55-11:55Block B 11:55-12:05BREAK (10 minutes) 12:05-1:05Block C 1:05-1:50LUNCH (45 minutes) 1:55-2:55Block D

Students Coming Early Can…  Work with peers/student leaders on projects  Catch up on homework  Study/review  Work with a peer tutor  Be engaged in DPA  *Supervised by administration if at school

Collaboration Time Model: Where, With Whom, and What  Occurs in the school  Teachers must meet with one other person  Pre-determined topic decided upon by the group with the outcome to benefit student learning.  Topic Examples: curricular area, co-planning, instructional strategies, assessment for learning

Collaboration Time Reporting Process  Online form  Survey (provides feedback to Collaboration Time committee)  Feedback from Collaboration Time initiatives

Feedback From Collaboration Time Initiatives  Examples of materials produced or used in class, data and comments showing success.  It may be as simple as forwarding the document, taking a picture during a class of what is going on (i.e. a special fair/theme day in a class), ing a comment that a student made, or sharing a document produced.

Reapplication Process  If successful, Collaboration Time at Steveston London will be reviewed by the school board after it’s first year.  The reapplication process will incorporate data from the following sources:  Discussions at staff meetings  Staff, student, and parent discussions and survey  Teacher sign up information and reflections  Examples of student successes/improvements