Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Growth and
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Making Your Own Luck with PGES: “What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity” Overview by Jill Cabrera, PhD Educational Administration, Leadership.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Professional Growth and
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Assessment for Learning May 6, 2014 Basia Kiehler Sandy Riley.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Mid-Course Check In, Data Tracking and Preparation for Summative Cycle T-PGES Daviess County Public Schools February 2015.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Teacher Talk Based on what you know now about LDC... What would you expect to see if you walked into a classroom that was implementing LDC at what you.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
KPBSD Effective Instruction Evaluation Committee LaDawn Druce Marina Bosick Daniel Olson Margaret Griffen Troy Minogue Juliana DeBoard Megan.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Welcome Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Arizona Teaching Standards
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Pike County Schools Implementing PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Focus on the Students Sherri Heise, Director of Instruction Tonia.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
State Board of Education Progress Update
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Presentation transcript:

Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member

February, 2012 – March, 2012: Train current 54 volunteer districts in field test protocols and multiple measures February, 2012 – May, 2012: Limited field test of multiple measures with 54 current districts Student growth/student goals Self-reflection Professional growth plan Student voice (GATES Integrated Grant Districts) Summer 2012: Train current 54 districts in additional multiple measures August, 2012 – May, 2013: Full-scale field testing of all multiple measures with 54 current districts Summer 2013: Train all districts in both the Teacher and Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System frameworks and multiple measures August, 2013 – May, 2014: Pilot both Systems in all districts August, 2014: State-wide implementation

Domain InstructionLearning Climate Leadership & Professionalism Student Growth Instruction that meets the needs of all diverse learners Teacher creates a safe, supportive, respectful, and engaging learning environment Teacher provides professional leadership Teacher contributes to student academic growth and overall school success Standards 1.1Demonstrates content knowledge 2.1Positive, respectful, and safe learning environment 3.1Engages in professional and leadership activities 4.1Contributes to growth of all students, regardless of demographics 1.2Plans formative and summative assessments 2.2High expectations3.2Designs, implements, and revises a professional growth plan 1.3Student-friendly learning targets 2.3Uses time, space, and resources 3.3Collaborates with colleagues, parents, and others 1.4Designs and implements instructional plans 1.5Integrates available technology

FRAMEWORK DomainInstructionLearning Climate Leadership & Professionalism Student Growth Standard 1.1 Content/ Best Practice 1.2 Assessment 1.3 Learning Targets 1.4 Planning 1.5 Technology 2.1 Climate 2.2 Expectations 2.3 Equitable Resources 3.1 Leadership/ Responsibility 3.2 Professional Growth 3.3 Collaboration 4.1 Student Growth MULTIPLE MEASURES (supported by artifacts and evidence) Principal/ Evaluator Observation Supervisor Observation of Teacher Instruction Instrument Student Growth Goal Setting; Professional Growth Plan LEA compone nt: Goal Setting (Cat.1-3 Assessme nts); SEA compone nt: State Achieve ment Tests Student Voice Tripod Student Survey Parent Voice To be Determined TBD Professional Growth Professional Growth Plan Instrument Self Reflection Teacher Self-Reflection Instrument Peer Observation Peer Observation of Teacher Instrument

1.What do we want students to know and be able to do? 2.How will we know when they’ve learned it? 3.How will we respond when students haven’t learned it? 4.How will we enrich and extend the learning for students who are proficient?

Working in the PLC group with which you self-identified at the beginning of the year, please do the following: 1.Review each of the domains and standards of the TPGES. 2.Identify standards that explicitly connect to the focus question of your group. Under the heading of “EXPLICIT”, chart those standards using their number (1.2, 2.3, etc.) Discuss how the particular standards connect and chart a word or phrase summarizing the connection. 3.Identify standards that implicitly connect to the focus question of your group. Under the heading of “IMPLICIT”, chart those standards using their number (1.2, 2.3, etc.) Discuss how the particular standards connect and chart a word or phrase summarizing the connection. 4.Be prepared to spend a few minutes in a carousel walk viewing your colleagues’ connections to their focus questions.

Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement; nothing can be done without hope. ~Helen Keller