Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting March 12, 2014.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
Local Control Accountability Plan Elvin Momon, Superintendent Board of Trustees Barbara Dew, Board President Timothy Hauk, Board Vice President Rita Jackson,
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013.
Commissioner’s Performance-Based Accountability Task Force: A Proposal for a Multi-level System Deb Wiswell & Scott Marion January 29, 2010.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
College Preparatory Course Certification Pilot May 5th,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Mark Roosevelt - Superintendent of Schools A Four-Year Comprehensive Framework for Improvement  Presented May 12,
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Local Control Accountability Plan Update, Renewal, Review Santa Barbara Unified School District
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
South Carolina Succeeds
Omaha Public Schools Strategic Plan Board Presentation March 17, 2014.
CUSD---LCAP 2015/16 (Local Control Accountability Plan) State Areas/Priorities CUSD Goals/Areas of Focus Budget/Engagement/Process.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP) GONZALES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Presentation: Joint City Council & GUSD Board March 28, 2016.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Strategic Plan Implementation Update Omaha Public Schools Board of Education October 20, 2014.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
California's Accountability System
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Tom Bean High School Targeted Improvement Plan Summary
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Local Control and Accountability Plan Annual Update for
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps

Plan Input 750 community members during community forums 1,800 Administrator and teacher surveys 171 Classroom Observations Individual and small group interviews (240 people) 18 Steering Committee Members 63 Workgroup Members 9 Board Members 34 Individuals submitted public comment

Outcome Measures Graduation Measures ACT Measures Student Engagement Measures State Test Accountability Measures

Graduation Measures Overall Outcomes TARGETS Increased % of students graduating from high school in four years (4-year ACGR). (Annual State Reporting (NSSRS)) * 77.78% Avail. Fall % Increased % of students graduating from high school in five years (5-year ACGR). (Annual State Reporting (NSSRS)) * 79.44% Avail. Fall % OPS 4-year graduation rate will be in the top 5% of all schools in the Council of Great City Schools. (Source TBD) TBD Avail. Fall 2014 Top 5%

Graduation Measures Overall Outcomes TARGETS Increased % of students “on track” to graduate at the end of each high school year. (Infinite Campus) * 78.44% Avail. Fall % Decreased % of students dropping out of school each year (dropout rate). (Annual State Reporting (NSSRS)) * 2.49% Avail. Fall %

Graduation Measures Overall Outcomes TARGETS Increased % of students graduating with one or more of the following:  Industry certification. (Source TBD)  College credit for at least one course. (Source TBD)  A score of 3 or higher on at least one Advanced Placement exam. (Annual AP Report)  A score of 5 or higher on at least one International Baccalaureate exam. (Source TBD) TBD Increased % of students enrolled in postsecondary education, enlisted in military, or employed six months after graduation. (Graduate Follow-Up Study) 87.09% ( ) Avail. Fall %

ACT Measures Overall Outcomes TARGETS Increased district average composite ACT score. (ACT Report) 19.0 Avail. Fall Increased % of students taking the ACT by the end of 12th grade. (ACT Report) 67.5% Avail. Fall % Increased % of students meeting college benchmark on the ACT Early High School Aspire test. (ETS Yearly Report) N/A Baseline TBD

Student Engagement Overall Outcomes TARGETS Decrease number of students opting out of the district by 5% annually. (Annual School Option Analysis) Decreased % of students who are absent 10 or more days. (SIS Attendance Dashboard) 35.00% Avail. Fall % Decreased % of students who are suspended or expelled from school. (Annual State Report) 10.94% Avail. Fall %

Student Engagement Overall Outcomes TARGETS Increased % of students who exhibit high school connectedness and high commitment to learning. (Student Climate/Engagement Survey and Developmental Assets Profile) N/ABaseline TBD Increased percentage of students who are highly engaged in the classroom. (Classroom Coaching Checklist) N/ABaseline TBD

State Test Accountability Measures Increased student proficiency every year across all grades and subjects on state accountability tests (State Test Reporting System) Test TARGETS Reading Grades %Fall % Math Grades %Fall % Science Grades 5, 8, 1146%Fall % Writing Grades 4, 8, 1153%Fall %

Safe Harbor Calculation Already a part of school improvement plans across district Defines acceptable growth as reducing the number of non- proficient students by 10% every year Example Reading – 62% Proficiency38% NOT Proficient Goal: Reduce 38% by 10% by next year 10% of 38% is 3.8% Goal: 62% + 3.8% = 65.8% Proficient for

Decreased achievement gap among all student sub- groups on state accountability tests Subgroup Comparisons Black/White Hispanic/White FRL/Non-FRL (Free/Reduced Lunch) SPED/Non-SPED (Special Education) ELL/Non-ELL (English Language Learners) Male/Female

Decreased Achievement Gap Reading Grades 3-11 Subgroup TARGET White Proficiency78%Fall % Black Proficiency48%Fall % Black/White Gap30%Fall % Hispanic Proficiency57%Fall % Hispanic/White Gap21%Fall %

Student Growth Increased percentage of students with at least one year of academic growth in the current school year on the NeSA reading and math tests. † (State Test Reporting System) Test TARGET Reading Grades %Fall % Math Grades %Fall % NeSA defines one year of growth as scoring the same or better scale score from one year to the next.

Objective Measures Measure progress towards meeting individual objectives Almost all require redefining metrics or new measurements Targets will be set after baseline data is established.

Public Comment Change Summary - From April 11 Board Meeting Discussion from change summary document send Wednesday April 16.

Updates Comment – increase student focus of outcomes. Action – Add the following paragraph above the outcomes: “Students will demonstrate significant progress towards measurable achievement and engagement outcomes so they are prepared to excel in college, career, and life. We are committed to providing the resources and tools necessary to accomplish this mission. It is through the success of our students that we define the success of our district.”

Updates Updated Outcome Measure Targets in yellow. (slides 5-14) Remove Strategy – “Give the ACT assessment to all eleventh grade students.” Rationale: Will wait until it is a statewide initiative.

Board Discussion Questions for UPD/C&J Questions for Executive Council Internal Board Discussion Are you prepared to vote to approve this plan? If No – what needs to change?

Next Steps – After Board Approval Prioritization of Objectives Creation of Implementation Workgroups Prioritization of Strategies Action planning for implementation Implementation SchoolStat performance management