1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Legislative Changes to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (AB 340 and AB 197) Presented by: Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association.
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Faculty Evaluation Policy Why: – Needed to comply with SACS accreditation guidelines – Must comply with UL System requirements – Needed to improve the.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Implementing post-290 EVALUATION: Remediating Inadequate Performance of Teachers 1 The Hungerford Law Firm April 13, 2015.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1 for Districts & Schools for Educators.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATOR EVALUATION PROJECT Presentation to the SLCSD Board of Education May 7, 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Maine Teacher Effectiveness Status.  Maine approved a teacher evaluation law during in the 2012 Legislative sessions.  The rules were determined in.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
LAKES COUNTRY SERVICE COOPERATIVE JOSH NELSON & EILEEN WEBER SEPTEMBER Teacher Evaluation Day III.
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education July 10,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education May 2, 2012.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Teacher Development & Evaluation Plan Overview August 2014.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Professional Rights and Responsibilities of Educators
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
FLORIDA EDUCATIONAL NEGOTIATORS
Presentation transcript:

1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation

2 Teacher Work Group Who: The commissioner in consultation with TeachersParentsBoard of Teaching MASAMSBAMN Business Partnership MESPAMASSPMN Chamber of Commerce MASSP Representatives of “Minnesota Assessment Group” Postsecondary institutions (research expertise in teacher evaluation )

3 Teacher Work Group What: “ Create and publish” a teacher evaluation process to be implemented should the teachers and the local district not develop one by “joint agreement.” When: For implementation beginning in the school year and later

4 Charge: Teacher Evaluation Work Group Working Group Tasks: must create and publish a teacher evaluation process that complies with the requirements in paragraph (b) {Subd 8) and applies to all teachers under this section 122A.40 and section 122A.41 [Subd 5} for whom no agreement exists under paragraph (a) for an annual teacher evaluation and a peer review process.

5 What does the law say? Purpose: To improve student learning and success, The process must include: Having trained observers serve as peer coaches or, Have teachers participate in professional learning communities, consistent with paragraph (b).

6 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say? (b) To develop, improve, and support qualified teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success, the annual evaluation process for teachers: Probationary Teachers: (1) must, for probationary teachers, provide for all evaluations required under subdivision 5;

7 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say?  (2) must establish a three-year professional review cycle for each teacher that includes o an individual growth and development plan, o a peer review process, o the opportunity to participate in a professional learning community under paragraph (a), and o at least one summative evaluation performed by a qualified and trained evaluator such as a school administrator. o For the years when a tenured teacher is not evaluated by a qualified and trained evaluator, the teacher must be evaluated by a peer review;

8 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say?  (3) must be based on professional teaching standards established in rule;  (4) must coordinate staff development activities under sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 with this evaluation process and teachers' evaluation outcomes;  (5) may provide time during the school day and school year for peer coaching and teacher collaboration;

9 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say?  (6) may include mentoring and induction programs;  (7) must include an option for teachers to develop and present a portfolio demonstrating evidence of reflection and professional growth, consistent with section 122A.18, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), and include teachers' own performance assessment based on student work samples and examples of teachers' work, which may include video among other activities for the summative evaluation;

10 M.S A Subd 8 What does it say? (8) must use an agreed upon teacher value-added assessment model –for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are available and –establish state or local measures of student growth for the grade levels and subject areas for which value-added data are not available –as a basis for 35 percent of teacher evaluation results;

11 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say? (9) must use longitudinal data on student engagement and connection, and other student outcome measures explicitly aligned with the elements of curriculum for which teachers are responsible (10) must require qualified and trained evaluators such as school administrators to perform summative evaluations;

12 Legislation: M.S A Subd 8 What does it say? (11) must give teachers not meeting professional teaching standards under clauses (3) through (10) support to improve through a teacher improvement process that includes established goals and timelines; and; (12) must discipline a teacher for not making adequate progress in the teacher improvement process under clause (11) that may include a last chance warning, termination, discharge, nonrenewal, transfer to a different position, a leave of absence, or other discipline a school administrator determines is appropriate.

13 Other Pertinent Language What does it say? Data on individual teachers generated under this subdivision are personnel data under section Applies to all teachers under section 122A.40 and section 122A.41. The teacher evaluation process created under this subdivision does not create additional due process rights for probationary teachers under subdivision 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies beginning in the school year and later.

14 M.S. 2010, Sec. 122A.40,subd. 6, Subd. 6. Mentoring for probationary teachers. A school board and an exclusive representative of the teachers in the district must develop a probationary teacher peer review process through joint agreement that is consistent with subdivision 8. The process may include having trained observers serve as mentors or coaches or having teachers participate in professional learning communities. Similar language in M.S Sec. 122A.41.

15 M.S Sec. 122A.40, Subd. 9 Subd. 9. Grounds for termination. A continuing contract may be terminated, effective at the close of the school year, upon any of the following grounds: (a) Inefficiency in teaching or in the management of a school, consistent with subdivision 8, paragraph (b); (b) Neglect of duty, or persistent violation of school laws, rules, regulations, or directives; (c) Conduct unbecoming a teacher which materially impairs the teacher's educational effectiveness; (d) Other good and sufficient grounds rendering the teacher unfit to perform the teacher's duties. A contract must not be terminated upon one of the grounds specified in clause (a), (b), (c), or (d), unless the teacher fails to correct the deficiency after being given written notice of the specific items of complaint and reasonable time within which to remedy them. EFFECTIVE DATE. This section applies to all collective bargaining agreements ratified after July 1, 2014.

16 Questions?