1 The US - German Bilateral Working Group (BWG): Collaborative Research for a Sustainable Future Ann Vega, USEPA/Office of Research and Development Maike.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations University Institute for Environment & Human Security Global Platform June 2009 "Advancing Knowledge for Human Security and Development.
Advertisements

The political framework
Group 4: Tools and instruments for cooperation 1a. What are the most suitable instruments to jointly address common challenges? (e.g. joint funding, joint.
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Enabling & Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 Enabling & Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 Research.
Neighbourhood Development Programme 31 October 2014.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Reuse / Revitalization. What is Reuse / Revitalization? Restoring contaminated and potentially contaminated sites to productive use.
| 1 The Municipal Farm Sustainable Reuse Plan Project funded through a Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Pilot Grant from the United States Environmental.
SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Sustainable Management Approaches and Revitalization Tools – electronic (SMARTe) Leipzig Baldwinsville, NY.
The Alaska Brownfield Initiative John B. Carnahan Alaska DEC – Brownfield Coordinator Alaska Forum on the Environment
Barbados’ Green Economy Scoping Study: The Interplay of Built Environment, Land Development and Water Dr Adrian Cashman Centre for Resource Management.
Chicago’s Broadband Strategy TOWARDS AFFORDABLE, UNIVERSAL TECHNOLOGY ACCESS City of Chicago Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Innovation and Technology.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
COMMUNITY ECONOMY ENVIRONMENTINFRASTRUCTURE P H O E N I X G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T E Sustainability-Oriented.
1 EPA Brownfields Revitalization Assessment and Cleanup Grant Funding What Makes a Winning Proposal October 2004.
1 European Development Days Brussels October 2012.
SUSTAINABILITY TEAM | May 19, 2010 Illinois APA, September 24, 2010.
Bridging the Finance Gap Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
EPA’s Brownfields Program Megan Quinn U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization January 25, 2008.
Funded by the Government of Alberta Ecosystem Services and Conservation Offsets April 24 th, 2012.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
Competitive Brownfields Grants  Assessment  Cleanup  Job Training  Revolving Loan Fund.
CSD-14 New York 2 May  A Government of Canada program that partners with cities in the developing world to address urban challenges.
Sustain and Enhance Cooperation on Sustainable Development between Europa and Southeast Asia Cluster Workshop at the ASEAN-EU STI DAYS 2015 Tools to support.
European Broadband Portal Phase II Application of the Blueprint for “bottom-up” broadband initiatives.
Bilateral Working Group 1 SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Ann Vega Brownfields Research Program Manager May 4, 2005 Clu-In Presentation for.
Bilateral Working Group SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Name Title Date Meeting Title.
An insight to Green Growth & Resource Productivity Environment Statistics Training Workshop, Doha, September 2012 Adriana Oropeza Lliteras VII.
Green Fund Application Process & Lessons Learned SALGA WORKSHOP, DURBAN 28 November 2013 Michelle Layte Green Fund Green Fund Application Process & Lessons.
Vision North Texas East & Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit September 17, 2010.
Brownfields: Real Property, the expansion or redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of contamination.
Presentation CESAER seminar, Trondheim Eva Camerer Policy Officer, Industrial Innovation Policy Development DG Enterprise and Industry 15 October 2010.
National Planning Department. Mobilizing private investment for low carbon development October 14 th, 2015.
Metropolitan Infrastructure Sustainability Study -- A Survey of U.S. Mayors June 13, 2009 Tom Phillips Director, Government Affairs Siemens Corporation.
International Community of Practice for Sustainable Urban Development On behalf ofImplemented by.
1 SMARTe’s Site Characterization Tool Ann Vega, USEPA, Office of Research and Development Kelly Black, Neptune and Company, Inc. Demonstration to ITRC.
Renewable Energy Potential at Contaminated Lands and Abandoned Mining Sites ConSoil 2008 June 5, 2008 Milan, Italy.
This presentation is the intellectual property of the authors. Contact for permission to reprint and/or distribute This poster arises from.
GEF-Assisted Integrated Ecosystem Management Project In The Trans- Boundary Areas Between Nigeria and Niger Republic.
Transport Programme Committee Arnoldas Milukas HoU Horizontal aspects and coordination DG RTD, Transport directorate 20 October 2010.
IDEA SUBMISSION India Innovation Lab for Green Finance.
AU/UNIDO/Brazil High-Level Seminar on Biofuel.  Policies are required to reflect the country’s development vision for the sector  Required to establish.
1 Framework Programme 7 Overview. 2 The Programmes within FP7 IDEAS European Research Counsel ERC PEOPLE Marie Curie Measures Initial Training Life-long.
Sustainability Principles for Land Use and Mobility Approved by City Council – January 2007.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
RE-Powering America’s Land: Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mining Sites December 15, 2010 Lura Matthews Phone: (202) U.S.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
DRAFT The RCRA Cleanup Vision for 2020 “Where are We Going? Matt Hale Director, Office of Solid Waste U.S.EPA.
Circular Flow Land Use Management (CircUse) IURS This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF.
Industry Briefing 25 May 2016.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES, HELPING WISCONSIN SUCCEED 7 Rivers Alliance Rural Workforce Housing Summit June 1, 2016.
Recommendations for the 2017 Budget Process April 18, 2016 Presenters: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer Wanda Bennett – Director, Corporate.
First Nation Waste Management Initiative
Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) Overview
FP7 – ICT Theme a motor for growth, competiveness and social inclusion
APEC 21st Century Renewable Energy Development Initiative
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
GREEN POWER ELECTRONICS
RESTORING CONTAMINATED SITES TO PRODUCTIVE USE
SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions
Paul Connor, Executive Director of NALGEP
Implementation of SAPCC:
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF)
Overview of Bank Water Sector Activities
Paul Connor, Executive Director of NALGEP
New Jersey Institute of Technology Technical Assistance to Brownfield Communities Program (NJIT TAB) Sean Vroom July 16, 2019.
Global Platform for Sustainable Cities - Resource Team (RT) -
Presentation transcript:

1 The US - German Bilateral Working Group (BWG): Collaborative Research for a Sustainable Future Ann Vega, USEPA/Office of Research and Development Maike Hauschild, Project Management Jülich on behalf of BMBF Leipzig Baldwinsville, NY

2 Outline Background – The Early Years (Phases 1-2) Phase 3 – Redevelopment of Potentially Contaminated Sites Phase 4 – Sustainable Land Revitalization German Program REFINA Contact Information; Websites

3 History of Collaboration between US and Germany Workgroup Began in 1990 Initial Focus on Cleanup Technologies In Focus on Redeveloping Potentially Contaminated Sites In 2006– Focus on Sustainable Land Revitalization A phased approach……

4 Ultimate Goal ……….. Working together toward common goals and a shared vision St. Louis, Missouri Stuttgart

5 Phase 3 Program Goal and Objectives Develop Tools and Techniques to Facilitate Revitilization Of Potentially Contaminated Sites Facilitate Equitable Land Use Facilitate Faster Redevelopment of Sites Allow Greater Independence from Public Money Enhance Benefits to Society OBJECTIVES:

6 Phase 3 Approach Step 1: Baseline workshops to identify obstacles to revitalization Step 2: Feasibility study to determine which obstacles the U.S.-German Bilateral Working Group could address Step 3: Research and develop tools and techniques to overcome obstacles to revitalization Step 4: Beta-test tools and techniques to determine if they facilitate revitalization SHARE IDEAS AND EXPERIENCES

7 Phase 3 Tools to Overcome Obstacles (Products) ( ) Documentation of 7 International Practitioners-workshops Sustainable Management Approaches and Revitalization Tools – electronic (SMART-e) [U.S.EPA] available at smarte.org Start-Up-Brachfläche – Arbeitshilfe (Germany) available at Report: Vapor Intrusion Issues at Brownfields Sites (ITRC) GEPARD – Bilingual Business Plan - Outlines an Interactive Calculation Tools

8 Phase 3: Workshop Summary ( ) – CD Ordering information at smarte.org WorkshopLocation Economic Tools November 2002 Charlotte, North Carolina Project Management and Market Strategies 7-8 May 2002 Saarbrücken, Germany Risk Assessment/Communication Tools October 2003 Portland, Oregon Social Aspects June 2004 Leipzig, Germany Sustainable Reuse September 2004 St. Louis, Missouri Summary Conferences 31 Oct-1 Nov 2005; April 2005 Berlin, Germany Denver, Colorado

9 Phase 4 Sustainable Land Revitalization

10 Phase 4: Program Goal and Objectives ( ) Develop Tools and Techniques to Facilitate Sustainable Land Revitalization Facilitate Environmentally, Socially, and Economically Viable Land Use Facilitate Transfer of Information Both Nationally and Internationally Allow Greater Independence from Public Grants Enhance Benefits to Society and the Environment OBJECTIVES:

11 Phase 4 – Approach ( ) Step 1: Baseline workshops to identify obstacles to sustainable land revitalization Step 2: Feasibility study to determine which obstacles the U.S.-German Bilateral Working Group can address Step 3: Research and develop tools and techniques and technologies to overcome obstacles to sustainable land revitalization Step 4: Beta-test tools and techniques to determine if they facilitate sustainable land revitalization SHARE IDEAS AND EXPERIENCES REFINA

12 What is REFINA? BMBF Research Program for the Reduction of Land Consumption and for Sustainable Land Management Forschung für die REduzierung der FlächenInanspruchnahme und ein NAchhaltiges Flächenmanagement Funding: €22 million Duration: Projects: 45 Concerted action between BMBF, BMU, BMVBS Integration of Federal Government, Länder, Local Authorities and Stakeholders

13 Background of REFINA Increase of population in % Increase of settlement area in % Growth of population versus growth of land use for housing, business and transportation (1950 – 1999)Growth of population versus growth of land use for housing, business and transportation (1950 – 1999)

14 Background Fragmentation of land by transport infrastructure red = high degree yellow = low degree Germany Total Area 357,021 sq km (slightly smaller than Montana)

15 Background Demographic change: shrinking, stable and increasing regions source: BBR 2005

16 Challenges in Land Management in Germany Maintenance of the regional economic power Reducing land consumption rates, preserve greenfield sites Re-using abandoned and derelict sites Ensuring the infrastructure for –Transportation and mobility, Housing, Trade, –Water supply, waste water, waste, energy, cleanness –Education, communication –Health care Decreasing social segregation Stimulating inner city investment Managing the urban-rural fringe => important to engage local authorities

17 National Strategy for Sustainable Development April 2002 Reduction of greenfield “consumption” for settlement and transport-related development to 30 ha/day (75 acres) in 2020 REFINA contributes to the 30 ha-goal of Federal Government.

18 REFINA Topics Follow-up costs Planning and development costs Cost-transparency for local authorities & private households New life at old sites Management of conversion projects Grey turns to green Communication to general public Specific offerings for local authorities Adress new target groups with innovative offerings Encouraging inner-city development Upgrading inner-city neighbourhoods New forms of funding (private-sector funds) Opportunities for regional cooperation and regional land management New planning instruments Regional dialogue

19 REFINA Philosophy REFINA projects Contribute to sustaina- bility Action orientated Inter- and transdisci- plinary Transferable Actor cooperation

20 Bilateral Cooperation – Phase 4 Cooperation based on REFINA projects with „volunteer“ practitioners in the US Projects should drive and benefit from the cooperation International cooperation –to learn from each other –to prove REFINA concepts –to strike new and unconventional paths in both countries

21 Phase 4 – Focus Areas ( ) Brownscape Design Regional and Local Land Revitalization Planning Project Management

22 Design Charrettes develop analytical and methodological repertoires to reintegrate brownfield sites into functional urban areas combine round table, design workshop, jury evaluation Hertener Allgemeine Zeitung Charrette North-West Aluminum The Dalles, Oregon 28 Apr - 2 May 2008 Charrette Westerholt Gelsenkirchen/Herten, Germany Nov 2007

23 Phase 4 – Workshop topics (8-9 May 2008) Regional Infrastructure and Transboundary Management Brownscape Design Financial Management Cross-cutting – Regional planning Criteria for Site Prioritization

24 Phase 4 – Potential Products SMARTe Tools and Expansion Regional Revitalization Planning Criteria Workshop Products Project Management Tools/Approaches (schedule, budget, maintenance, training programs) Institutional Controls Tools, Evaluation Design Criteria Model Design Approaches (including visual simulation tools) Case Studies Other Revitalization Tools

25 Ann Vega, BWG Program Manager (U.S.) U.S. EPA – Office of Research and Development Maike Hauschild, BWG Program Manager (Germany) Project Management Juelich Contacts

26 US-German Bilateral Working Group REFINA SMARTeSTART-UP Plan smarte.orgwww.vegasinfo.de/startup/ Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Web Sites