CEE 970 Colloquium Final Presentation Khalid Aljuhani Veronica Asare-Yeboah Ethan Frost Issam Kayssi Hannah Silber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Advertisements

Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
CENTRAL CORRIDOR TRANSIT ACCESS STUDY Citizens for Modern Transit March 27, 2014.
Health and Social Impact Assessment of the South East Queensland Regional Plan NSW HIA Colloquium Sydney, 9 December 2006 Kate Copeland, Director, Statewide.
Vision North Texas Presentation by Karen Walz FAICP.
CARE OF CLIENTS IN URBAN AND RURAL SETTINGS. Approaches to Defining Rural and Urban § U. S. Census Bureau § Office of Management and Budget (OMB) § Montana.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
The Sustainable Communities Partnership and U.S. DOT’s Livability Initiative 6 th Annual East and Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit Don.
Using HIA on Climate Change Policy: A Training Course for Public Health Professionals Chapter 4: Scoping.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Health Impact Assessment for Healthy Places: A Guide for Planning and Public Health.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.
CE 573 Transportation Planning1 Societal Changes and Transportation Planning CE 573 Transportation Planning Lecture 8.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
WalkSanDiego, created 1998 Move San Diego, created 2004 Merged Staff 18 Board Members $1,040,000 Annual Budget.
Managing Director/CEO
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
July 15, 2011 NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Cairssa Schively Design for Health.
The Health Impact Assessment (HIA): Promising Best Practices in Transportation Eloisa Raynault | | Transportation, Health and.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Project Monitoring and Evaluation in the GMS 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen Project Monitoring and Evaluation for Road Construction in Lao.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
Community Strategies to Improve Health March 16, 2006 Rebecca Flournoy, MPH.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Council Policy Forum Feb. 23, 2015 CAPITAL PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
Shreya Gadepalli Regional Director (India) August 2015 The BRT Standard Bus Rapid Transit Best Practices.
Vital Signs 11: Development and Results of Sustainability Indicators 1 Presentation to NNIP Columbus, Ohio June 21, 2013 Matthew Kachura Research Associate.
Transportation and the CDM: Lessons from Chile John Drexhage, IISD November 29, 2005 Montreal.
An Analysis of the Quality of Wisconsin’s Community Health Improvement Plans and Processes 2011 Wisconsin Health Improvement and Research Partnerships.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #5 MARCH 12 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM Northern Service Center.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Public Health in Wisconsin 101 Excerpted from a presentation by Emily Dieringer Health Educator, Winnebago County Health Department Coalition Coordinator,
Global City Teams Challenge September 29-30, 2014 Report Out: Connected, Intelligent Transit Portland, Oregon.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Public health and environment 1 |1 | Putting health at the heart of the Green Economy agenda _____ Making the links for Rio+20 Department of Public Health.
Metrics for Health, Development and the Environment Christopher JL Murray Institute Director.
Opportunities and challenges for health impact assessment within the scope of environmental impact assessment Brian L. Cole, Dr.P.H. Health Impact Assessment.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
JEANETTE M. BALL, MS A HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA) ON A PROPOSED “ROAD DIET” AND RE-STRIPING PROJECT IN SPARTANBURG, SC 2012 GEORGIA-LINA BIKE SUMMIT.
39th Meeting of APEC EGEE&C Sydney, Australia 28 February 2012
Regional Roads Committee
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
The value of public transport for community wellbeing
Mobility Choice Blueprint
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Global Platform for Sustainable Cities - Resource Team (RT) -
Presentation transcript:

CEE 970 Colloquium Final Presentation Khalid Aljuhani Veronica Asare-Yeboah Ethan Frost Issam Kayssi Hannah Silber

Bus Rapid Transit in Madison: An Abbreviated Health Impact Assessment

BRT in Madison

BRT Components  Service  Every 15 minutes or better  Runningways  Dedicated lanes  Preferential lanes  Fare Collections  Electronic pre-pay fare cards  Route Structure  Stations spaced further apart to provide express service  ITS  Signal preemption  Real-time arrival signs

BRT Components  Vehicles  Distinct articulated design  Hybrid – diesel engine  Stations  Upgraded stations  Amenities (ticket booths)  Travel information

Proposed BRT Route

Goals 1. Reduce travel times 2. Attract new transit riders 3. Improve connections between low income/transit dependent areas and centers of employment/activity 4. Provide expanded carrying capacity 5. Improve operational efficiencies 6. Provide enhanced image for transit service 7. Improve comfort/convenience 8. Integrate with existing and planned transit 9. Enhance opportunities for transit-oriented development (TOD)

Population Density

Average Household Income

SCREENING

BRT Public Health Stakeholders  Sponsors (Government)  Gov’t: local, regional, county, state, national  Builders (Contractors)  Contracted Agencies  Owners  City of Madison  Public, Madison residents  Operators  Madison Metro  Users  Riders  Other transportation service providers  Other Drivers  Businesses  Homeowners

Stakeholder Analysis Level of Interest Level of Influence Government Users Owner/Operator Contractors Other Transportation Service Providers Businesses Private Citizens

Stakeholder Roles GovernmentContractorsOwner Operator UserOther ResponsibleXX AccountableXXX ConsultedXX InformedXX

HIA Sponsor  Government  Resources to leverage  Internal  Contractor  Owner/Operator  What is important to this sponsor?  Maximizing public benefit  Actionable policies/programs  Policy/Program effectiveness

Objectives  Objectives (stated & evaluated in report):  Reduce Travel Times  Attract New Transit Riders  Improve Connections Between Low Income and/or Transit Dependent Neighborhoods and Centers of Employment/Activity  Provide Expanded Carrying Capacity  Improve Operational Efficiencies  Provide An Enhanced Image for Transit Service  Improve the Comfort and Convenience of the Transit Experience  Integrate Well with the Existing and Planned Transit System  Enhance Opportunities for Transit Oriented Development

HIA Objectives/Criteria Community safety Education Family & social support Employment Built environment Environmental quality Income Unsafe sex Alcohol use Diet & exercise Tobacco use Access to care Quality of care Physical environment (10%) Social & economic factors (40%) Health behaviors (30%) Clinical care (20%) Health Factors Programs and Policies Health Outcomes Mortality (length of life): 50% Morbidity (quality of life): 50%

HIA Objectives/Criteria Community safety Education Family & social support Employment Built environment Environmental quality Income Unsafe sex Alcohol use Diet & exercise Tobacco use Access to care Quality of care Physical environment (10%) Social & economic factors (40%) Health behaviors (30%) Clinical care (20%) Health Factors Programs and Policies Health Outcomes Mortality (length of life): 50% Morbidity (quality of life): 50%

Requirements  Evaluate Social and Economic impacts  Investigate effectiveness of achieving stated objective(s)  Evaluate Environmental impacts  Compare to current  Compare to next-best alternative

Transit Dependent Areas

Why HIA?  Objectives (stated & evaluated in report):  Improve Connections Between Low Income and/or Transit Dependent Neighborhoods and Centers of Employment/Activity  Evaluate actual effectiveness in improving economic well being  Improve Operational Efficiencies  Provide other means of calculating/defining operational efficiency  Provide An Enhanced Image for Transit Service  Capture impacts BRT system would have to ensure decisions enhance the image  Improve the Comfort and Convenience of the Transit Experience  Ensure BRT system does not impose costs or inconveniences in other ways  Other  Document and discover benefits  Avoid costs

HIA Breakdown Structure HIASocioeconomicEducationMetric(s)Technique(s)EmploymentIncomeSupportSafetyEnvironmental Environmental Quality Built Environment Metric(s)Technique(s)

SCOPING

Processes  Initiate  Sponsor  HIA Proposing party  Plan  Sponsor  Responsible/Accountable/Consulted teams  Execute  HIA team  Monitor/Control  Responsible/Accountable/Consulted teams  Close

Constraints  Aims & Objectives  Reduce Travel Times  Improve connections between low income and/or transit dependent neighborhoods and centers of employment  Provide enhanced image for transit service  Improve comfort and convenience of transit experience  Community Concerns  Cost  Accessibility

Extent &Boundaries  What is to be included?  Current transit system in the City of Madison  When will the assessment be done?  May 2014  How much time will it take?  1 month  What is the geographic scope of the HIA?  City of Madison  What is the temporal scope of the HIA?  Current and future impacts over a 10 year period  What is the source of funding for the HIA?  Madison Area Transportation Planning Board

Methods  Census data collection to estimate where people might benefit from BRT  Demographic characteristics  Economic status  Community surveys  Cost/benefit analysis  Model current and predicted air pollutant concentrations of particulate matter to gauge impact of BRT

Community Participation  Diverse viewpoints from technical experts  Viewpoints from stakeholders  Identify locally important concerns and health issues

Health Indicator Categories  Safe and sustainable transportation  Environmental stewardship  Public infrastructure  Healthy economy

Health Indicators  Average vehicle miles traveled per bus per day  Average vehicle time traveled per bus per day  Average number of overcrowded buses per route per day  Proportion of commute trips made by public transit  Proportion of average income spent on transportation  Proportion of households with ¼ mile access to local bus  Air pollution exposure  Respiratory disease

Conclusion  BRT:  Components  Goals  Routes  Screening:  Stakeholders  HIA objectives  Scoping:  Process  Methods and Indicators