Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Muon g-2 Inflector AEM Meeting 11/25/2013 Chris Polly Muon g-2 Project Manager.
Advertisements

Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Status of EXO-200 Carter Hall, University of Maryland DUSEL town meeting November 4, 2007.
March 14, 2002GJG NCSX CRYOGENICS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STATUS WBS-63.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
NCSX NCSX CDR May 21-23, 2002 Larry Dudek Slide 1 Facility Systems (WBS 62-65) L. Dudek, G. Gettelfinger, M. Kalish.
DHB, nEDM Collab. Mtg, 15/16 Apr 04 UIUC Test System (Beck, Chandler, Hertzog, Kammel, Newman, Peng, Sharp, Williamson, Yoder; Blackburn, Kenyon, Thorsland)
NEUTRON EDM Philip Harris, on behalf of the CryoEDM collaboration: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory University of Oxford University of Sussex ILL University.
Machine Advisory Committee Review APS Upgrade Installation Plan and Schedule John Noonan November 15, 2006.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, µ AIP Scope Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler RF.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Slide 1 Systems Analysis and Design With UML 2.0 An Object-Oriented Approach, Second Edition Chapter 1: Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design Alan.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
Anthony Indelicato DOE-Princeton Site Office May 2012 Construction Progress Review for the NSTX Upgrade Project Construction Progress Review for the NSTX.
EDMEDM EDM Fast Start, May 23, 2006He3S, Steven Williamson EDM Fast Start Helium-3 Services (He3S) Steven Williamson May 23, 2006.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
1Page # Machine Assembly WBS 700 By: James H. Chrzanowski January 24, 2001.
Collab 5/26/06 #1 EDMEDM Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson and Contract Project Manager for the EDM Project for presentation to The EDM Collaboration.
P25 Interface 5/19/08 #1 Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to The nEDM Subsystem Managers Duke University,
MICE Coupling Coil Testing at Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting Ruben Carcagno March 19, R. Carcagno - MICE CC Testing at Fermilab3/19/2012.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
EDM collaboration meeting WBS 9.0: Slow controls, Simulations, DAQ/data analysis Chris Gould- North Carolina State University and Triangle Universities.
1 How Can We Get More Neutrons? Upgrade Paths for the EDM Geoff Greene University of Tennessee /Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct 2006.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
January 4, 2007 RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Existing RHIC power supply Modifications Don Bruno & George Ganetis January 4, 2007 Power Supply Modifications.
EDM Engineering Issues General Mechanical Considerations EDM Cryostat Plan D ANSYS EMAG Calculations ANSYS MECH Calculations 3 June ‘03 J. Boissevain.
December 13, 2006 Blanket and Shield Design Considerations for Magnetic Intervention G. Sviatoslavsky, I.N. Sviatoslavsky, M. Sawan (UW), A.R. Raffray.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
Summary of Valve Design Status for nEDM L. Bartoszek BARTOSZEK ENGINEERING 6/20/05.
NEDM Collaboration Meeting 5/2008 Preliminary Engineering Report nEDM Central Detector John C. Ramsey Los Alamos National Laboratory.
EDMEDM LANL Review of EDM Cost and Schedule Jan Boissevain, P-25 February 11, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design Tour of the Reference.
EDMEDM C&S Review 2/11/05 #1 Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to LANL Cost and Schedule Review Committee.
EDM Assembly and Commissioning – or – How to Cut Two Years from the Project P. Huffman and V. Cianciolo.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
October, 2009 Cost of SRF Components Gary McIntyre October, 2009 Internal Review.
EDM Fast Start Presentation WBS 11 – Assembly and Commissioning Vince Cianciolo, Paul Huffman May 23, 2006.
1 Cryogenic Design and the 4 He Evaporative Purifier David G. Haase, et al., North Carolina State University.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
EDMEDM EDM Collaboration Meeting 6-05 Jan Boissevain, P-25 June 20, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab CSN2, September 22,
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Proposed LCLS-II SCU Schedule Soren Prestemon (LBNL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
MICE Coupling Coil Test Proposal Ruben Carcagno Fermilab July 9, MICE CC Test Proposal7/11/2011.
Office of Nuclear Physics R&D 12/14/06 #1 Risk Based R&D Plan Martin Cooper Los Alamos.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin UW, June 3, 2010 The DM-Ice Test Detector Detector Concept Mechanical Assembly Vessel Options Logistics Considerations.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Specifications for the Integrated Tests II Paul Huffman.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
WBS 1-7 System Assembly & Installation John Voirin August 10-11, 2011.
WP High Beta Cavities Delivery
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
Update on He3 Services design since the ORNL meeting
Dana M. Arenius Jefferson Laboratory Cryogenics Dept Head
David Montanari / Johan Bremer Jun 11, 2015 Rev. 1
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
IR Beam Transport Status
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman

Assembly 12/14/06 #2 Work Package Scope  To bring together the tested components from the individual work packages and integrate them to form a complete apparatus.  To demonstrate completion of the CD4 delivery specifications.

Assembly 12/14/06 #3 Subsystem Integration  The apparatus is unique in that a large fraction of the subsystems must be integrated into the cryogenic vessel. These include: Cryogenic magnetic shields and coil package Measurement cell and high voltage work package 3He polarizer, purifier, and transport work package  The remaining subsystems are less coupled to this vessel and thus have reduced integration concerns.

Assembly 12/14/06 #4 Cryovessel Integration Drives the Schedule  The duration of the integration is dominated by the length and number of times the apparatus must be cooled and tested.  We estimate that each cooldown cycle will take approximately six to eight weeks.  The integration plan attempts to keep the number of cooldown cycles to a minimum.

Assembly 12/14/06 #5 Planning Assumptions  The subsystems arrive at the cryovessel assembly site fully tested.  Integration of the subsystems occurs in a phased approach.  We require the ability to test the 3He transport and the coil package w/o the external magnetic shield.  ORNL is the assembly and commissioning site.  Dedicated cryogenic personnel will be hired by ORNL.

Assembly 12/14/06 #6 Phased Assembly Approach  The subsystems will be incorporated sequentially in the cryovessel. (Order not critical) 1.Measurement cell and high voltage work package 2.Cryogenic magnetic shields and coil package 3.3He polarizer, purifier, and transport work package  This allows us to: balance heat loads with the available cooling powers. test the operation of the supplied components. fully characterize any interactions between subsystems.  Integration of the DAQ subsystem components will occur in parallel as the systems are integrated.

Assembly 12/14/06 #7 High Voltage System and Measurement Cell  Resides primarily inside the 1200-l helium volume.  Contains the high-voltage capacitor and electrodes, the measurement cells and light collection system.

Assembly 12/14/06 #8 Cryogenic Shields and Coil Package  Attached to 4K shields, resides outside of 1200-l helium volume.  Contains a superconducting and ferromagnetic shield and multiple magnetic coils

Assembly 12/14/06 #9 3He Injector and Purifier  Resides in upper section of cryovessel, operates at low temperatures (< 500 mK).  Contains the atomic beam source, purifier, collection volumes, and transport coils and plumbing.

Assembly 12/14/06 #10 Integration Schedule  Schedule (and cost) is dominated by the number of cooldown cycles required for successful commissioning: 4 for insert 3 for coil package 4 for 3He components 5 for integrated tests and commissioning (w/ beam, B-shield)  These estimates are our best guess; it is impossible to know how long it is going to take to diagnose a problem!

Assembly 12/14/06 #11 Non-Cryovessel systems  Integration occurs in parallel  Components include: External magnetic shields Neutron Beam Facilities infrastructure (counting house, power, water, etc.)

Assembly 12/14/06 #12 External Magnetic Shields  Testing and most of the assembly currently not on the critical path.  Estimate four to six weeks just to assemble once!  Very fragile!!  Current schedule minimizes the handling at ORNL.  Not feasible to have shields in place when testing cryovessel.

Assembly 12/14/06 #13 Neutron Beamline  Installation performed by the vendor.  Only last ~2 m of guide on the critical path (mates to cryovessel/B-shields).  Primary constraints are the procurement and the FNPB schedule.

Assembly 12/14/06 #14 Infrastructure  Not on the critical path.  Includes the counting house, electrical, plumbing, and other services.  Schedule assumes larger FNPB external building; a smaller building will delay schedule. Counting House

Assembly 12/14/06 #15 Important Additional Factors  Technician time is significantly more at ORNL than at UT/NCSU.  A lack of on-site cryogenics staff at ORNL will significantly increase the risk and thus increase the number of anticipated cooldowns in this phase of the project.  We have devised a way to perform the magnetic shield assembly and testing at ORNL without removing the cryogenic vessel.

Assembly 12/14/06 #16 CD-4 Requirements  Cryogenic vessel Demonstrated to cool the central detector volume to 500 mK Operated with the magnet coil package in place  Magnet coil package /B 0 < /cm at 77 K *  Four-layer magnetic shield Shielding factor of * * Tests performed offsite

Assembly 12/14/06 #17 CD-4 Requirements (cont.)  Central detector insert High voltage holds 5 kV/cm with a leakage current <10 nA Mean number of photoelectrons from 750 keV of energy deposition is  4 SQUID noise 1 Neutron storage time in similar cell demonstrated to be >100 sec in an independent test

Assembly 12/14/06 #18 CD-4 Requirements (cont.)  3 He services Produces  /cm 3 of  70%-polarized 3 He in the collection volume as seen with a SQUID* Purifier reduces the 3 He concentration to less than 1 part in 10 11* 3 He demonstrated to move between volumes with a time constant of 500 s or less* Valves shown to operate over 500 cycles* Installed in the cryogenic vessel  Neutron guides Flux out/MW  4 x 10 5 n/Å/cm Å with a polarization  70%

Assembly 12/14/06 #19 CD-4 Requirements (Magnetic Shield Scenario)  3 He services Demonstrate 3 He injection, purification, and transport in the assembled apparatus at ORNL  Four-layer magnetic shield Installed at ORNL  Neutron guides Mated to Cryogenic vessel

Assembly 12/14/06 #20 CD-4 Requirements (Completion Scenario)  Operate the high voltage multiplier at 500 mK in the fully assembled apparatus at ORNL to obtain a field of 5kV/cm.  Observe the decaying oscillatory signal from polarized UCN captures on polarized 3 He with a S/N>1  Observe the decaying oscillatory signal from the SQUIDS of the 3 He magnetization with a S/N>1

Assembly 12/14/06 #21 Cost and Schedule ScenarioCD-4 Completion Date CD-4 Approved TPC ORNL Ops 3He installedNew4/6/20136/5/2013$18,427,161$705,367 3He Operational, B-shields in place Early completion with shields in place 1/26/20143/28/2014$18,988,669$275,707 Ready for Data Collection Runs Signals Observed 11/8/20141/8/2015$19,393,340$0

Assembly 12/14/06 #22 Operations Required at ORNL  Construction and integration of the cryovessel at ORNL will require this level of activity: 1 senior cryogenic expert - early postdocs (hired through a university) 1/2 time from S. Penttilä 2 technicians (hired through a university) Cryogenic expertise from the collaboration  Funding is included in the project for the 2 technicians

Assembly 12/14/06 #23 Summary  Duration and costs dominated by the length and number of cooldowns.  Duration can be shorted by shifting parts of the final commissioning into operations.  Cryogenic expertise presently resides at NC State/TUNL.  Personnel hires at ORNL required to proceed with this plan.  NC State will continue to play a leading role in the cryogenics design and implementation.