Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 1 A Digital Pipelined Cathode Front End Board (DCFEB) Stan Durkin The Ohio State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Large Area, High Speed Photo-detectors Readout Jean-Francois Genat + On behalf and with the help of Herve Grabas +, Samuel Meehan +, Eric Oberla +, Fukun.
Digital CFEB Prototype Plans 1 B. Bylsma, CSC Upgrade Workshop, Ohio State Univ., April 23-24, 2010 Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade - DCFEB Status S. Durkin, B. Bylsma The Ohio State University FNAL ME1/1 Review 7/20/
S. Durkin, USCMS-EMU Meeting, Oct. 21, 2005 Critical Data Errors S. Durkin The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 20, 2005.
Oct, 2000CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25s1 STATUS Testing started beginning September 1 wafer cut, others left for probing 10 chips mounted on test boards.
Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Alexei Safonov (Texas A&M University) For the EMU community.
CMS EMU CSC Upgrade Digital CFEB B. Bylsma, CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Nov. 8, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
CPT Week, April 2001Darin Acosta1 Status of the Next Generation CSC Track-Finder D.Acosta University of Florida.
Upgrade of the CSC Endcap Muon Port Card Mikhail Matveev Rice University 1 November 2011.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
Alexei SemenovGeneric Digitizer Generic Digitizer 10MHZ 16 bit 6U VME Board.
1 SCA Cell Utilizing Scheme The output of each preamp-shaper channel is sampled continuously at 20 MHz and stored the SCA cells. There are 96 cells for.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
A Study of Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC The Ohio State University - Task A.2 B.G. Bylsma, L.S. Durkin, D. Fisher, J Gilmore, J.H. Gu, D. Larson,
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Digital CFEB (an Update) B. Bylsma, EMU at CMS Week, March 16, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
RPC Upscope Meeting Jay Hauser 05 Feb 20101/11 Overview of the CSC Phase I Upgrade plans ME4/2 upgrade: 72 new large chambers for high-luminosity triggering.
UCLA meeting, 2012 Hauser1 Since last week Technical Coordination workshop Gave talk on CSC upgrades New 2013 timeline – ME4/2 seems okay, ME1/1 is tight,
1 Status Report on ADC LPC Clermont-Ferrand Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
HBD/TPC Electronics Status Works done to for a)Prototype detector readout b)Understand packing density and heat loading issues c)Address the overall system.
Fermilab Silicon Strip Readout Chip for BTEV
Upgrade of the CSC Endcap Muon Port Card with Spartan-6 FPGA Mikhail Matveev Rice University 30 April 2012.
TPC electronics Status, Plans, Needs Marcus Larwill April
HBD/TPC Electronics Status Works done to for a)Prototype detector readout b)Understand packing density and heat loading issues c)Address the overall system.
SKIROC ADC measurements and cyclic ADC LPC Clermont-Ferrand Laurent ROYER, Samuel MANEN Calice/Eudet electronic meeting Orsay June.
S. Bota – Calorimeter Electronics overview - July 2002 Status of SPD electronics Very Front End Review of ASIC runs What’s new: RUN 4 and 5 Next Actions.
CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.
GMM, 05-Jul-2015 Jay Hauser Another look at CSC ME3/1, ME4/1 descoping 1  Recall descoping scenarios for 235 and 200 MChF:  Tiziano:
Readout controller Block Diagram S. Hansen - CD-1 Lehman Review1 VXO Ø Det Links to 24 SiPM Front End Boards Clock Event Data USB ARM uC A D Rd Wrt 100Mbit.
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
Work on Muon System TDR - in progress Word -> Latex ?
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
The Ohio State University
R&D activity dedicated to the VFE of the Si-W Ecal
Update on CSC Endcap Muon Port Card
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
University of California Los Angeles
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
ALCT Production, Cable Tests, and TMB Status
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary
CSC Trigger Update Specific issues:
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
LHCb calorimeter main features
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Presented by T. Suomijärvi
ME1/1 Electronics Upgrade
TOF read-out for high resolution timing
SVT detector electronics
SLHC CSC Electronics Upgrade Spearheaded by OSU CMS Group
BUCKEYE has internal shift register which controls calibration
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Presentation transcript:

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 1 A Digital Pipelined Cathode Front End Board (DCFEB) Stan Durkin The Ohio State University

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 2 Present Cathode Front End Board (CFEB) BUCKEYE (ASIC) - amplifies and shapes input pulse SCA (ASIC) - analog storage for 20 MHz sampled input pulse ADC - events with LVL1ACC digitized and sent to DAQ Motherboard (25 nsec/word) Controller FPGA - controls SCA storage and digitization Comparator ASIC - generates trigger hit primitives from shaped pulse Input/Output - 5 cfebs/chamber, 96 strips/cfeb - 96 switch capacitors/channel - system is self triggering Optimized for Precision Position Measurement

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week Buckeyes serve 6 planes x 16 strips - 6 SCA’s serve 96 strips with 96 caps each 50 nsec/sampling no pedestals (< 1%) -6 ADC’s (150 nsec digitization) 12-bit + overflow bit output 1 strip charge/25 nsec 8 samples digitized for each of 96 strips -6 SCA’s (96 caps/strip) LVDS signaling no cap pedestals -Control FPGA 12 blocks of 8 caps each grey-code (1 bit flip) addressing (see movie for algorithm) 16 Cap Delay Cap Storage (Poisson) Cap Digization (Queue) Beam CrossingPreLCTL1A·LCT 0.8  sec2.2  sec 26  sec Caps can be used for storage when all others in use 16 caps set aside for possible use For L1A  LCT use LCT to choose which 8 capacitors to digitize Done CFEB 50 nsec Sampling and Digitization Each Strip Amplifier Charge stored every 50 nsec in capacitors

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 4 Simulation Single Strip Capacitor Usage A Nontrivial FPGA Algorithm 8 capacitors/block Green – recently used Blue – set aside waiting for L1A Red- digitizing

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 5 16 Cap Delay Cap Storage (Poisson)Cap Digization (Queue) Beam CrossingLCTL1A·LCT 0.8  sec2.2  sec 26  sec Transfer to DMB Complete Caps can be used for storage when all others in use For SLHC this is the main capacitor usage Data Bottlenecks in CSC DAQ at SLHC CFEB’s 96 Capacitors/channel is main DAQ rate limiter DCC’s SLINK-64 is second DAQ rate limiter (configurable) Simple Model CFEB Capacitor Storage

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 6 Strip Channels Time (50ns/bin) Neutron/Gamma Event from X5 Beam test (Aug 99) Random coincidence between L1A and Neutron/Gamma Background Dominates Rate

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 7 SCA Occupancy: LHC Rate Assumptions L1 Accept: 100 kHz LCT rate: 69 kHz per CFEB (worst case – ME1/1) Estimated LCT rate for 10**34 lumi (D. Acosta et al, 2001) Chamber Type LCT rate per CFEB (kHz) ME1/1 69 ME1/2 4 ME1/3 2 ME2/1 21 ME2/2 3 ME3/1 11 ME3/2 2 ME4/1 8 ME4/2 9 L1-LCT coincidence rate per CFEB: 100 kHz x 70 kHz x 75 ns = 0.5 kH Digitization time (with 6 ADCs on each CFEB) 16 channels x 16 samples/channel x 100 ns = 26  s Note: This is Monte Carlo, We haven’t measure rates yet! Problem! ‘ME1/1 LCT 96kHz/chamber (20 kHz) CMS Note ’ Hauser

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 8 ME1/1 Effective SCA Buffer Occupancy at SLHC At SLHC: use same L1 accept rate assuming rates go up linearly. Maximum LCT rate is 700 kHz (ME1/1), L1-LCT match rate is 5.25 kHz. Average number of LCTs during 5.2  s (=6  s-0.8  s) holding time for 2-blocks:  =5.2x10 -6 x700x10 3 =3.64 Average number of L1-LCT matches during 26  s digitization time:  =26x10 -6 x5.25x10 3 = Probability of overuse of SCA: 0.09 !!!!!!!!!

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 9 Digital CFEB – A Nice Idea for the SLHC Replace Conventional ADC and SCA storage with Flash ADC and Digital Storage New System Deadtimeless, Removes rate worries Similar cost to old system Fairly Radical Design – Couldn’t build 8 Years Ago

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 10 Fix ME1/1 Ganged Strips Removes ganged strips in ME1/1a (aka ME1/4) Gets rid of ghost tracks trigger and offline software Requires 7 DCFEBs per ME1/1 Chamber Cathode charges Improve Cathode Trigger Primitives -presently an ASIC chip -do digitally on new board  =1.5  =2.0  =2.4 Besides Deadtimeless there are other Advantages

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 11 Overall Scope of Upgrade ME1/1 Electronics Upgrade 504 DCFEBs 72 DMBs 72 TMB (d.c.) 12 MPC 72 LVDB (+more power) 72 LVMB 1008 Cables (default skewclear) LVDB

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 12 Evaluation of Flash ADCs (B. Bylsma O.S.U) ADC choices:(8 ch, 12 bit, MSPS, Serial LVDS output)  MAX1437 (Maxim) 1.8V supply, 1.4V pp range  ADC12EU050 (National) 1.2V supply, 2.1V pp range  AD9222 (Analog Devices) 1.8V supply, 2V pp range  ADS5281 (Texas Instr.) 3.3V analog, 1.8V digital, 2V pp range

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 13 No Flash ADC is a drop-in replacements for SCA/ADC -ADC’s  All have differential inputs  Limits on common mode  Have internal input bias network -Pre-Amp  Single ended output  Limited range of baseline level  Designed to drive small capacitive load -Pre-Amp/ADC Interface  Mnfr. suggest transformer coupling (not an option for us)  Amplifier to generate differential signal (requires 96 amplifiers)  Direct couple single ended signal (common mode consequences) (level shifting/scaling)  AC couple single ended signal (common mode consequences) (no level shifting, but still have biasing to consider Flash ADC/Amplifier Coupling Issues

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 14 Common Mode Constraints (ADS5281) ADC Constraints:  V cm -600mV < (IN+ + IN-)/2 < V cm +300mV (1.8V pp on IN+)  (IN- -1V) < IN+ < (IN-+1V) (ADC output range) Pre-Amp Constraints:  Baseline Level -Currently 1.8V -Max ~2.0V -Min ~1.2V (maybe 1.0V)  Drive Capability -Small (few mA at best) Scaling:  Scale down input  Add digital gain on output  Resistor divider Direct Coupling Difficult Common Mode  Data Sheet: V cm = 1.5  V  How far from nominal?  Baseline Level -Range  Digital output range is 2V  But is linear range of common mode 2V

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 15 DCFEB R&D plans Short Term Goal: Install Prototype System on a ME4/2 Chamber during 2012 Shutdown DCFEB Critical Item so Divide Labor (Generic R&D) DCFEB R&D Board, OSU FPGA Firmware, Florida Virtex 6 R&D Board, TAMU Virtex 6 Radiation Testing, NEU Optical Cable Interface DCFEB  DMB/TMB 50 nsec Samples Buckeye Amp -> ADC5281 Evaluation Board Preliminary Tests are Encouraging Flash ADC sensitive to common mode gain Need R&D board to fully test coupling and noise

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 16 DCFEB R&D Board Designed to study (there will be issues): - Coupling single ended Buckeye Amp to bipolar flash SCAs - Linearity/Shape … Noise on Analog-Digital boards can be problems - use old PC board’s analog isolation

Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 17 DCFEB R&D Board Available Late this Summer Then: - noise tests - linearity/pulse shape tests - radiation tests, SEU and lifetime measurements If all goes well layout and schematics of a DCFEB Prototype board will start late Fall Conclusions