Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SVT detector electronics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SVT detector electronics"— Presentation transcript:

1 SVT detector electronics
Mauro Villa INFN & Università di Bologna Overview: - SuperB SVT - Front End chips - Layer 0 peculiarities - SVT channels and rates - Data transmission - SVT in trigger and DAQ schemas

2 SuperB SVT 40 cm 30 cm 20 cm Layer0 Layer Radius cm cm cm cm to 12.7 cm to 14.6 cm Baseline: use an SVT similar to the BaBar one adding a Layer 0 Layer 0 options: striplets or thin pixels (40x40 um^2). Each layer has several modules, mechanically independent units (52+8) Each module has 2 half-modules, electrically independent units: Sensor, front-end chips, HDI with power/signal input and data output link Pixel half-module Strip(lets) half-module Data Pixel sensor + front-end chips HDI Power/Signal HDI Si Wafers Data Power/Signal Front-end chips Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

3 Data driven vs triggered FE chips
Data Driven chips FSSR2: only minor modifications needed for SuperB MAPS: no storage of data in local high radiation environment Could allow to use SVT data for LV1 trigger Need very fast link to send all data from HDI to DAQ (layer 0 critical! See next tables) Triggered chips Sending off chip only data from LV1 evt reduces by ~ 1/10 the load to the data transmission Need to investigate if there is a good match for striplets! MAPS readout: data out of high rad desiderable. Data stored outside vertex region in custom high rad memory chips. Pixel sensor + front-end chips Off Detector HDI Power/Signal DAQ Data HDI Power/Signal Very Fast link DAQ On Detector Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa link Data

4 Layer0 peculiarities Rad hard environment Large machine background ( 15 mm from beam line) Fundamental the first point of a track for vertexing Option under study: strip or pixel sensors (40 um pitch) Apsel6D – or similar 320x216 pixels a 40 um pitch. Active Area = 110 mm2 Completely data driven architecture Space time coordinates Time granularity us (1.0 us is the goal) External Time stamp clock. Hit rate expected: 110 Mhit/s/chip (with a safety factor>5). Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

5 SuperB Layer 0 Module Plan: 2009-2010 Production of a test module
6 Chips: 1.1 cm^2 Signal lines: 180 in 1 cm width Hit Rate: 110 MHz/chip (safety>5) Module Rates: 660 MHz Bandwidth: 20 Gbit/s (design parameters) Thin aluminium bus for power and signals Main technological challenge: Line spacing (<100 um) Frequency (> 100 MHz) Plan: Production of a test module With 2-3 APSEL5D chips Electric and beam tests Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

6 SuperB SVT in numbers 6 layers: Layer0 + 5 layers like BaBar SVT
Modules HDI ReadOut Section (ROS) chips/ROS chips channels 0- Striplets 8 16 32 6 192 2.46E+04 0- Pixels 12.59E+06 1 12 24 7 168 2.15E+04 2 3 10 240 3.07E+04 4 64 5 288 3.69E+04 18 36 72 324 4.15E+04 total 60 120 1316 12.97E+06 Track layer0: 5.3 GHz (safety factor 5 included) fully dominated by machine bkgd Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

7 Load to the data transmission
Requirements on link speed reduced by 1/10 Assuming 1 us window and 100 KHz LV1 rate Simulated Background rate x20 (cluster multiplicity and safety factor) Layer flux (Hz/cm2) 1 us occupancy HDI Link speed Read all data Data driven ( bit/s/ROS) Read only LV1 evt (bit/s/ROS) hit/evt bit/evt (with 25 bit word) 0- Striplets 1.00E+08 9.00E-01 1.73E+10 1.73E+09 2.21E+04 5.53E+05 0- MAPS 2.50E-03 1.64E+10 1.64E+09 2.10E+04 5.24E+05 1 2.00E+05 2.00E-02 4.48E+08 4.48E+07 4.30E+02 1.08E+04 2 3 1.00E+05 6.40E+08 6.40E+07 6.14E+02 1.54E+04 4 noise occu 1.00E-02 1.60E+08 1.60E+07 3.69E+02 9.22E+03 5 4.15E+02 1.04E+04 evt size L1-5 7kByte evt size L0 66kByte Present BaBar data Similar in SuperB L1-L5 Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

8 Data transmission Option A: HDI with local rad-hard ram,optical links,
L1 handled in the HDI Option B: HDI with line drivers, copper cables, L1 handled outside detector Memory buffers And L1 logic Buffers and line drivers optical/copper Link Optical Link 2.5 Gbit/s FEC ROM Off detector low rad area Counting room Std electronics On detector High rad area Pro B: fewer rad-hard elements few space required on HDI full event readout (trigger) commercial optical link only Pro A: data flux reduced asap shorter high load connections Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

9 EDRO Readout board Front End Card used in Slim5 beam test (SVT par. II): Main concept: flexibility at all levels Mezzanines to decouple input/processing/output Large FPGA Several triggering schema Slink To DAQ SuperB: 60 Mhz bus clocks 20 Gbit/s input rate 2.5 Gbit/s output rate To be addressed in the next versions foreseen in 2009/10 Performances: 40 Mhz bus clocks 8 Gbit/s input rate 1 Gbit/s output rate 2.5 ME/s evaluated for L1 40 kHz DAQ Data from FE chips 4 Gbit/s EPMC Stratix EPMC TTCRQ Not too far from SuperB numbers Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

10 SVT in trigger and DAQ schemas
Current best FE chip candidates are data driven with an intrinsic time resolution of us Interface between FE chips and SuperB trigger and DAQ will be provided by a board equipped with large FPGA, memory and optical links (i.e. flexible) Consequences SVT will fit both the fixed and variable L1 latency schemas SVT readout time window of 1 us or larger will be handled in the HDI or off-detector electronics. Same for fixed or variable time window. SVT might have the possibility to provide information on events before L1 trigger (L1-L5 best, L0 maybe). SVT in trigger conceiveble. Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa

11 Conclusions Main SVT challenge: layer 0
rates, chips, data busses and data transmission Current best FE chip candidates are data driven Front End Card and/or HDIs with enough logic to fit different DAQ and L1 schemas Trigger rate >150 kHz, time window >=1 us ✔ Data volume: L0: 66 kB with 1 us time window and >5 safety factor L1-L5: 7 kB with 1 us time window (Babar exp.) SVT in trigger conceivable SVT electronics R&D in 2009/10 Paris, 16/02/09 M. Villa


Download ppt "SVT detector electronics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google