August 2013 Day 2 Grand Valley Learning Network. Activating Your Instructional Model If your school has an articulated instructional model (or definition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Through Instructional Rounds
Advertisements

Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
 Veteran classroom English/ELA teachers  Literacy specialists for Durham Public Schools  Professional development providers  Understanding by Design.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics “This we believe…” A&S Meeting March 20,2015.
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Supporting Creative Collaborative Teaching Tandem Placements CPD session 2.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Effective Lesson Planning and Design
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
Aligning Curriculum Standards, Instructional Practices and Assessment.
Articulating a Program of Study to the Oregon Registry Oregon Center for Career Development in Childhood Care and Education Portland State University pdx.edu/occd.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
AISSA “Down the Track” Seminar April 7-8, 2011 Backward Mapping: curriculum planning for aligning pedagogy and assessment Dr. Katie Weir.
Optimizing Professional Collaboration to Improve Teaching and Learning GVSU Learning Network August 2013.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Modern Studies: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Burden/Byrd Methods for Effective Teaching: Meeting the Needs of All Students, 6/e USING.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
Oregon Mentoring Program
Mentoring Moments: Classroom Observation and Debriefing for NTIP Teachers & Mentors Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 15 / March 2013.
Maryland’s Co-Teaching Network Resources Overview.
STUDENT GROWTH UPDATE LEARNING GOALS FOR TODAY - Teachers will be able to clearly delineate between the 4 levels of expectations on student.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Common Core Where have we been and where we are going…
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
1 Unpacking the Common Core Staff/Curriculum Development Network June 3, 2011 Gail Sobolewski Senior Mathematics Specialist Jack Costello Director of School.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
PSYC 3110 Educational Psychology William G. Huitt, Ph.D. Last Revised: August 1999.
Pathwise Mentoring UA Fort Smith College of Education Laura Witherington Spring 2009.
Bernard Rahming Lee Ann Pruske Rosann Hollinger Sharonda Harris Assessment Session PRIME Framework: Teaching and Learning Leadership Principle MTL Meeting,
Strategies for Classroom Management: Organization and Planning CHAPTER 2.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Math Leadership Teams October, 2014.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
October 10, Start/end on time All technology is on-task Hold each other accountable Dive in to make this your own: no acting Stop and ask your burning.
CCRS Implementation Team SCIENCE Quarterly Meeting #
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Collaboration in Education Developing an Equal Opportunity to Learn Cindy Foster, David Jones Everett Public Schools April 12, 2007.
Blue Friday PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
What is High Quality Instruction? What does it mean for me? Donna Eustace Education Technology Consultant Kentucky Department of Education 1.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Chapter 1 National Board of Professional Teaching Standards 15 Standards Describe what teachers need to know and how they support student learning Chapter.
Let’s talk about “Understanding Language” and EC students Learning Profiles Professional Collaboration Support Structure of MTSS.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Growing Through Change August 2 & 4, 2011 Leadership Academy 2011 LCPS Preparing all students to be competitive and productive citizens in a global economy.
Courtney Clawson Department of Agricultural Education and Studies
Focus on scholarship, leadership, and results
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Common Understandings of Mapping
Analyzing Student Work
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Leaders of Teachers (external to classroom)
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Chapter Eight Co-teaching Models © 2016 Taylor & Francis.
Using Content Maps for Curriculum Materials & Curriculum Management
Teaching by Design in Elementary Mathematics
Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Improving Classroom Management to Improve Student Learning
Teaching Collaboration Collaboratively
TEAM-Math and AMSTI Professional Mathematics Learning Communities
Instructional Program Alignment
Presentation transcript:

August 2013 Day 2 Grand Valley Learning Network

Activating Your Instructional Model If your school has an articulated instructional model (or definition of high-quality instructional practice), what are its core components? What evidence would you need to see in a classroom? If your school does not have an articulated instructional model, what do you think defines high-quality instructional practice?

What do you see? Describe what you see? – Be descriptive? Avoid judgments and evaluation. – Be specific? Avoid vagaries and generalities.

Team Discussion To what degree does this teaching vignette represent our school’s instructional model? – What is your evidence? – What are the specific changes that would bring this in greater alignment with your instructional model?

Mapping Backwards to Professional Collaboration Given your school’s bet, what has to occur consistently in your professional collaboration sessions so that teacher behaviors change to produce the desired improvement in student learning?