Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 June 2010 o IBL Insertable B-Layer ATLAS Italia / Referee Roma, July 14 th 2010 G.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 June 2010 o IBL Insertable B-Layer ATLAS Italia / Referee Roma, July 14 th 2010 G."— Presentation transcript:

1 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 June 2010 o IBL Insertable B-Layer ATLAS Italia / Referee Roma, July 14 th 2010 G. Darbo – C. Meroni INFN / GE – MI On behalf of INFN IBL Agenda: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=100499

2 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 2 Outline Status of the IBL project With focus on INFN related activities Status of the Technical Design Report (TDR) Schedule Consolidation of the Physics & Performance case for IBL Interim-Memorandum of Understanding Cost, resources, sharing Richieste finanziarie e attività 2011

3 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 3 Material from Raphael/Neal The present 7 m long section of the beam-pipe will be cut (flange too big to pass inside the existing pixel) and extracted in situ. The new beam-pipe with the IBL inserted at its place. IST IBL Support Tube Alignment wirers PP1 Collar IBL Detector IBL Staves Sealing service ring IBL Specs / Params 14 staves, = 33.25 mm. CO 2 cooling, T < 15ºC @ 0.2 W/cm 2 X/X 0 < 1.5 % (B-layer is 2.7 %) 50 µm x 250 µm pixels 1.8º overlap in ϕ, <2% gaps in Z 32/16 single/double FE-I4 modules per stave Radiation dose 5x10 15 n eq /cm 2 IBL Specs / Params 14 staves, = 33.25 mm. CO 2 cooling, T < 15ºC @ 0.2 W/cm 2 X/X 0 < 1.5 % (B-layer is 2.7 %) 50 µm x 250 µm pixels 1.8º overlap in ϕ, <2% gaps in Z 32/16 single/double FE-I4 modules per stave Radiation dose 5x10 15 n eq /cm 2

4 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 4 LHC Plans & IBL Milestones IBL Milestones FEI4 submission : 6/2010. sensor choice 6/2011. FEI4 Version 2 eng. Run 9/2011. first prod module 11/2012 last prod module 9/2013. Stave loading completed (incl. 3 months cont) 6/2014 End of integration (incl. 3 months cont) 5/2015 IBL installation 5/2015 – early 2015 Installation possible, but no contingency. LHC plans (ATLAS interpretation) Have a phase I and II Phase I when 30÷50 fb -1 Accumulate 300÷400 fb -1 on phase I Agreed with CERN management to have phase I shutdown in 2016 (unofficial yet). IBL design specification (L int, L) Life dose @ integrated of 500 fb -1 R/O: peak L=3x10 34 @ LVL1=100kHZ Ref. M. Nessi

5 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 5 FE-I4 (GE) FE-I4 FINAL LAYOUT 87M TRANSISTORS! 19.0 mm 20.2 mm Engineering Team: At Bonn Tomasz Hemperek, Michael Karagounis, and Andre Kruth; at CPPM Denis Fougeron, Fabrice Gensolen, and Mohsine Menouni; at Genova Roberto Beccherle; at LBNL Julien Fleury (visiting from LAL), Dario Gnani, and Abderrezak Mekkaoui; and at NIKHEF Vladimir Gromov, Ruud Kluit, Jan David Schipper, and Vladimir Zivkovic. Students: David Arutinov (Bonn), Bob Zheng and Frank Jensen (LBNL) Physicists : Marlon Barbero, Maurice Garcia-Sciveres Engineering Team: At Bonn Tomasz Hemperek, Michael Karagounis, and Andre Kruth; at CPPM Denis Fougeron, Fabrice Gensolen, and Mohsine Menouni; at Genova Roberto Beccherle; at LBNL Julien Fleury (visiting from LAL), Dario Gnani, and Abderrezak Mekkaoui; and at NIKHEF Vladimir Gromov, Ruud Kluit, Jan David Schipper, and Vladimir Zivkovic. Students: David Arutinov (Bonn), Bob Zheng and Frank Jensen (LBNL) Physicists : Marlon Barbero, Maurice Garcia-Sciveres 60 KGD / Wafer 16 Wafers

6 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 6 Module Prototype Program & Test Beam (GE, PI, TN, UD) Sensors and IBL activities merging Test beam coordination & analysis between IBL and Sensor R&D EUDET telescope used by Planar, 3D and Diamond sensors: 3 µm resolution! Common order and plans for FE-I4 prototype modules, bump-bonding at IZM. INFN contribution to the cost: 9k GE, TN and UD focusing on 3D, PI part of the planar prototyping Once sensor technology will be decided, INFN will contribute to production Residual from EUDET extrapolation to 50µm pitch pixels (single hit clusters). FBK-Irradiated 3E sensors (*) Residual from EUDET extrapolation to 50µm pitch pixels (single hit clusters). FBK-Irradiated 3E sensors (*) Flat top: High telescope resolution 50µm IBL Planar Sensors PI 3D Sensors GE, TN, UD Diamond Sensors Test beam Coordination within IBL WG1 ATLAS Collaborations for sLHC R&D

7 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 7 3D Sensor – Recent results ( * ) 3D sensors from FBK irradiated to 10 15 – 5 x 10 15 n eq /cm 2 Karlsruhe: 26 MeV protons Ljubljana: reactor neutrons Lab & Test Beam measurements (*) Very good efficiency at 80 V @ 10 15 n eq /cm 2 (preliminary) Not full 3D devices… Full 3D in development at FBK ( * ) Credits: June 2010 beam and lab tests name list M. Borri, M. Boscardin, L. Bosisio, V. Cindro, G.F. Dalla Betta, G. Darbo, C. Da Via, B. DeWilde, Su Dong, C. Gallrapp, C. Gemme, H. Gjersdal, P. Grenier, S. Grinstein, P. Hansson F. Hugging, A. La Rosa, A. Micelli, C. Nellist, S. Parker, H. Pernegger, O. Rohne, A. Rovani, K. Sjobaek, K. Tsiskaidze, J. Janssen, J.W. Tsung, N. Wermes. Angle = 0º - Eff. = 99.0% Angle = 15º - Eff. = 99.9% p-irradiated devices (dose = 10 15 n eq /cm 2 ) Lorentz Angle @ B = 1.6 T) Planar: Θ L = -7.4º ± 0.4 3D: Θ L = 0º

8 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 8 FBK – 3D Sensors for IBL IBL Design (slim and active edge): 3D sensor with slim edge (200µm) and full through columns. DRIE (Deep Reaction Ionizing Etching) is stopped by a 0.7µm membrane. In process 200 and 230 µm thick wafer batches. Expected wafers Oct.2010 Active edge, with support wafer. Wafer end of the year. Wafer floorplan has 8xFE-I4, 9xFE-I3, CMS,... Planar Sensor 3D Sensor 700nm DRIE stopping membrane FBK 3D wafer for IBL FBK DRIE: 200÷230 µm x 12µm

9 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 9 Indium Bump Bonding (MI, GE) 4 Pixels shorted 6 Pixels shorted 8 Pixels shorted 164 Pixels shorted Dummy sensorDummy FE Indium BB at Selex (technology option, SiAg at IZM baseline) Selex qualified for small FE-I3 need to change the process to FE-I4 First attempt with dummy was partially succesfuls Need to upgrade the flip-chip head and change pressure/temperature of the process Test with scan chains -> with FE-I4 if successful. X-ray of FE-I4 size dummy bumped to dummy sensor

10 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 10 ROD (BO + GE) Redesign the ROD (Read-out Driver) architecture starting from the Pixel design: Reason: components obsolescence, bottle neck of the Architecture, complexity in debugging due to mixed DSP / FPGA environment. Smart Idea: Move the embedded processing used for calibration (4 DSP/Board) to standard PC: use GB-ethernet Responsibilities: BO the ROD board, FPGA, PowerPC Programming GE electrical-BOC to connect to FE-I4 modules without opto-link (debug the initial system) INFN responsibility

11 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 11 Flex Hybrid Design (GE) Stave flex (technology / test demonstrator) Final layout made at GE submitted to CERN PCB workshop: in production 5 Cu layers and 1 Al layer (for LV) Total thickness = 0.45mm (Designed) Impedance = 80Ohm Several additional designs Single layer module flex, test boards, Simulation of the full chain undergoing at GE EOS Wing Bus (10mm wide) Simulation of transmission: CLK/DT-IN (40 MHz, multipoint) Simulation of transmission: DT-OUT (160 Mbps, multipoint)

12 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 12 PP2 Redesign (MI) IBL needs new Power Distribution System: Increase of current per channel worst case (up to ~ 4A) Solution: use two LDO (low drop outputs) / channel with current limit Controller board to improve the existing design (new FPGA) Collaboration between Milano and Barcellona FPGA: same ACTEL family but need to qualify for radiation tolerance Regulator Board Controller Board PP2 Crate

13 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 13 Stave Design (MI) STAVE CARACTERISTICSSIMULATION RESULTS Pipe ID/OD [mm] Omega Thickness [µm] Foam Density [g/cm 3 ] CoolantX/X 0 [%]Thermal Figure of Merit (Γ) [ºCcm 2 /W] Bare Stave with Coolant Full layer (+ Module + Flex) CF pipe, heavy foam 2.4 / 3.01500.55C3F8C3F8 0.481.05617.25 CF pipe, light foam 2.4 / 3.01500.25CO 2 0.360.95618.56 Ti 3mm pipe, light foam 2.8 / 3.03000.25C3F8C3F8 0.661.2762.79 Ti 2mm pipe, light foam 2.0 / 2.23000.25CO 2 0.571.1663.22 Design baseline defined: Ti cooling pipe with CO2 cooling. Prototyping and test Many prototypes made Status: finalizing base line design Major technical contributions from MI and ~1/3 of the project under financial responsibility of INFN Baseline

14 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 14 TDR IBL Technical Design Report Status

15 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 15 TDR: Status & Schedule Motivation for delay in TDR printout: LHC machine plans after Chamonix, luminosity profile, machine shut-downs impacted on IBL TDR. Need of better documentation of Physics performance for the TDR ATLAS EB "IBL physics and performance taskforce (M. Elsing, A. Andreazza) The TF will reinforce the efforts to ensure the completion of the IBL performance studies for the IBL TDR by end of August. TDR draft (Schedule) First draft circulated to selected readers, comments received, being implemented. Second review by experts: mid July. TDR draft ready for distribution to IBL Collaboration: 2 nd week of August Final TDR ready: 4 th week of August Submission to LHCC: 1 st week of September Iourii Gusakov Existing B-layer IBL (Staves) Ed Moise IBL (Staves) IBL in the Physics Simulation & in the Engineering CAD Rendering

16 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 16 Physics & Performance TF consolidate and extend present studies single particle performance (pions and muons) tracks in jets (100 and 500 GeV di-jets, top, WH) primary vertexing with high lumi. Pileup b-tagging, especially redo high-pt jets studies study different pileup scenarios zero, 10 34, 2*10 34 and 3*10 34 luminosity estimate efficiency and fake rate vs lumi demonstrate how IBL helps for robust tracking in jets, with fakes, … add emulation of Pixel/SCT readout problems study robustness of tracking and how IBL recovers performance Status IBL geometry existing, motecarlo production ongoing Checking results on single tracks, tuning jets and vertexing TDR editing… keep deadline!!!

17 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 17 IBL Performance (TF Results) Simulation shows: Clear improvement in impact parameter resolution (plot 1) Specially in the region p T <10 GeV, that in ATLAS is dominated by multiple scattering 50% improvement of rejection power in b- tagging (plot 2) Performance are stable even if existing b- layer is off (plot 3). Plot 1 (top events) Plot 1 Light jets rej. Plot 3 IP resol.

18 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 18 MOU Interim-Memorandum of Understanding

19 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 19 Memorandum of Understanding IBL Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between The ATLAS COLLABORATION, and Funding Agencies/Institutions of the ATLAS Collaboration constructing the IBL (for the ATLAS construction was between Institutes and CERN). The MoU comprises all of the actions needed to construct and commission the IBL. The operation and maintenance of IBL is not a part of the present MoU and will be included, following its completion, within the M&O MoU framework. (IBL once delivered will be part of the Pixel Detector) Annexes define: work sharing and responsibility, cost contribution, project organization and management structure. IBL interim MoU – Why an interim MoU? Ad Interim MoU until sensor technology is chosen (Planar Silicon / 3D Silicon / Diamond) - Decision on sensor technology (Spring 2011) – Sensor R&D and IBL communities work in tight collaboration to finalise a design matching IBL specification. Consolidate interest of Institutes and availability of funds

20 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 20 Development of Interim-MoU IBL (interim)-MoU Status: IBL Kick-off meeting (8/7/2009) Institutes express their interest in the IBL based on project WBS (Workpackage Breakdown Structure). Institute Board created with the Institutes interested in the project Extended Pixel IB (Meetings: 1/03/2010 and 18/06/2010) Defined sharing of work, cost amongst Institutes/Funding Agencies (i-MoU annexes) All project is covered by resources – need x-check with Funding Agencies (FA) Status Collecting feedback from FA on funding and general project support Going to sign the interim-MoU? INFN (BO, GE, MI, UD) Quite active in the project, very good synergy and collaboration keeps up INFN visibility. IBL (interim)-MoU Status: IBL Kick-off meeting (8/7/2009) Institutes express their interest in the IBL based on project WBS (Workpackage Breakdown Structure). Institute Board created with the Institutes interested in the project Extended Pixel IB (Meetings: 1/03/2010 and 18/06/2010) Defined sharing of work, cost amongst Institutes/Funding Agencies (i-MoU annexes) All project is covered by resources – need x-check with Funding Agencies (FA) Status Collecting feedback from FA on funding and general project support Going to sign the interim-MoU? INFN (BO, GE, MI, UD) Quite active in the project, very good synergy and collaboration keeps up INFN visibility.

21 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 21 Institutes and Contributions to IBL Note: the numbers in the table "are not final, nor are the suggested financial contributions yet firm, but are meant for a common overall discussion. Technology options refer to supplementary costs that are sensor technology specific and will be known before the definite MoU takes effect. 42 Institutes in the interim- MoU (few others are observers ). 14 Countries + CERN 9.7 MCH total project cost

22 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 22 INFN Contribution to IBL Total IBL cost: 9741 kCH Total INFN contribution: 1400 kCH (14.4 %) 1047 kCH CORE 354 kCH M&O-A in-kind ~100 kCH presently on M&O-A could be deducted from INFN if cables (assigned as work responsibility) becomes in- kind contribution.

23 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 23 INFN Contribution to MoU Items Resources and deliverables are summarized in the two tables

24 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 24 RICHIESTE FINANZIARIE 2011 – Programma attività INFN, richieste finanziarie, responsabilità, milestones

25 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 25 BOLOGNA Attività 2011: Sviluppo PCB prototipo ROD. Sviluppo firmware FPGA e software PowerPC del ROD porting software da DSP (old Pixel ROD) a PowerPC Test bench per sviluppo software TDAQ del ROD (Crate e Single Board Computer – SBC)

26 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 26 GENOVA Attività 2011 Sviluppo prototipo funzionale Flex Hybrid per lo stave e per il modulo Disegno versione 2 del FE-I4 (sottomissione Autunno 2011) Catena alta tensione: Test della catena completa di alta tensione con PS, cavi a PP1, Flex hybrid, sensore Si sta discutendo di installare I cavi nell Shut Down 2012/13 – sono su M&O-A, potrebbero essere presi in-kind (stima ~40÷50 kCH). Sviluppo prototipo & test dei moduli: in vista della produzione (2012) del 50% del totale Sviluppo scheda BOC (back of crate card) elettrico per leggere moduli con ROD senza opto-link (per QC RoD, test-beam, system test, produzione moduli…). In collaborazione con BO e gruppi tedeschi (BOC)

27 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 27 MILANO Attività Milano 2011: Prototipaggio e preproduzione stave Modifiche schede regolatori PP2 (differenti specifiche FE-I4: VDD, IDD ), scheda controller PP2 (nuova FPGA da qualificare con irraggiamento), backplane Sviluppo bump-bonding con Selex (alternativa technologica alla IZM)

28 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 28 TRENTO (Dot.1 PD) Attività 2011: Simulazione sensori in 2 D e 3D layout sensori 3D (slim e active edge), layout maschere bump-bonding Test strutture su wafer sensori 3D: prima e dopo irraggiamenti

29 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 29 UDINE Attività 2011: Sviluppo sensori 3D insieme a UD e TN (fase di prototipaggio), Bump-bonding di FE-I4 con sensori 3D Test-beam, irraggiamenti sensori 3D Pre-produzione sensori (tecnologia da decidere a metà 2011)

30 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 30 Sommario Richieste e Responsabilità IBL Responsabilità nel progetto IBL: Giovanni Darbo:IBL Project LeaderL1 https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/InnerDetectorOrganisation https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/InnerDetectorOrganisation Danilo GiugniStave WG CoordinatorL2 https://espace.cern.ch/atlas-ibl/Shared%20Documents/IBL_Organization.v1.2.pdf https://espace.cern.ch/atlas-ibl/Shared%20Documents/IBL_Organization.v1.2.pdf

31 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 31 Milestones INFN Milestones – ATLAS IBL: IBL -Test beam di rivelatori con chip FE-I4 30/4 IBL - Scelta baseline per i sensori 31/7 BL - produzione e test prototipo ROD/BOC 31/10

32 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 32 Conclusions IBL planned to be completed by 2015 CERN/Experiments agree on a shutdown in 2016 TDR is progressing and documenting the technical design of the IBL Deadline for submission to LHCC early September iMoU ready to sign Some Countries/Institutes already did. INFN balanced between money contribution and visibility of activities, but Competition is high … and many want a seat on boat!

33 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 33 BACKUP SLIDES

34 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 34 IBL Project Status in Pills All the aspect of the IBL project are pretty well covered: Some in advanced design or prototype phase, as mentioned sensor and FE-I4 Just to mention a few Stave: baseline CO 2 cooling & Ti-pipe, TM measurements & FEA simulation well on its way. Stave/module flex-hybrid: multi-layer and stacked single layer prototyping. Internal services: design, simulation, prototyping Off-detector R/O: architecture defined, detailing board design and firmware Power chain: upgrade study of the PP2 regulator. Simulation & design, waiting FE-I4 for selecting power scheme. Sensor decision impacts HV selection. Integration in SR1, installation mockup in bld. 180: designs, prototypes, getting parts Stave loading: ideas, testing, looking at jigs Layout: global supports, beam-pipe flanges, IST 2012 shutdown: preparatory activities in the pit for IBL Installation: guiding pipe, insertion/extraction table, ALARA Cooling: cooling plant parameters, TM studies and prototypes for beam-pipe bakeout For most updated overview checkout June IBL Workshop at hold Geneva Univ.: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=93635#20100616.detailed

35 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 35 IBL Layout Baseline layout decided 14 Staves, reverse turbine (there were two main options in Barcelona) Beam-pipe reduction: Inner R: 29 25 mm Very tight clearance: Hermetic to straight tracks in Φ (1.8º overlap) No overlap in Z: minimize gap between sensor active area. Layout parameters: IBL envelope: 9 mm in R 14 staves. = 33 mm. Z = 60 cm (active length). η = 2.5 coverage.

36 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 36 Extraction/Insertion Progresses on many areas: Installation mock-up (Geneva & CERN ) in bld 180 Extraction/Insertion table (LPSC Grenoble) Long Guiding Tube (Brandeis) Integration and Envelopes definition (CERN Atlas TC) Beam-pipe split flanges (CERN Vacuum group) ALARA (CERN Atlas TC) Installation Mock-up in bld.180

37 ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 July 2010 37 IBL TDR Editors: M.Capeans (CERN), K. Einsweiler (LBNL) Chapter Editors: G.Darbo, T.Flick, M.Garcia-Sciveres, C.Gemme, H.Pernegger, O.Rohne, R.Vuillermet and quite many Contributors to different chapters: A.Andreazza, O.Beltramello, A.Catinaccio, I.Dawson, D.Ferrere, KK.Gan, D.Giugni, Y.Gousakov, N.Hartman, I.Hinchliffe, F. Huegging, S.Kersten, N.Massol, P.Morettini, D.Muenstermann, L.Nicolas, M.Raymond, S.Rozanov, D.Su, W.Trischuk, C.da Via, E.Vigeolas and S.Wenig Chapters Structure: 1.Overview – IBL history, lifetime and failure issues, requirements, physics 2.Modules – sensors (3 technologies), FE electronics, integration (bump-bonding, mini- Flex) 3.Staves - mechanical concept for the stave, module loading, cooling and thermal issues, electrical integration, internal services 4.Integration - mounting staves with beampipe, services integration, final surface testing 5.Control, Readout, and Integration - power supplies, opto-links, off-detector readout electronics, external services, cooling plant, DCS, integration with the present detector DAQ/DCS 6.Installation – beampipe extraction, mock-up, IBL transport and installation, connection and testing 7.Commissioning – calibration, early data-taking plan with random triggers, charge injection, cosmic ray data-taking 8.Prototyping, Production Testing, System Testing 9.Critical Integration Issues – cooling, bakeout, powering, detector weight, material budget 10.Project Management and Organization Draft has 200 pages (too long?). Circulated to selected readers (many comments received): Attilio Andreazza, Andrea Catinaccio, Allan, Nigel Hessey, Tim Jones, Leonardo Rossi, Steinar Stapnes, Georg Viehhauser, Norbert Wermes


Download ppt "ATLAS Italia / CSN1 Referee – IBL G. Darbo – INFN / Genova Roma, 14 June 2010 o IBL Insertable B-Layer ATLAS Italia / Referee Roma, July 14 th 2010 G."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google