Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Predictions for Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Predictions for Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors"— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Predictions for Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors
D.L. Pulfrey, D.L. John, L.C. Castro Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. V6T1Z4, Canada

2 Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube
Hybridized carbon atom  graphene monolayer  carbon nanotube 2p orbital, 1e- (-bonds)

3 VECTOR NOTATION FOR NANOTUBES
Zig-zag (6,0) Chiral tube (5,2) Tube Structure (n,m): Armchair (3,3) Adapted from Richard Martel

4 Compelling Properties of Carbon Nanotubes
NANOSCALE -- no photolithography BANDGAP TUNABILITY eV METALS AND SEMICONDUCTORS -- all-carbon ICs BALLISTIC TRANSPORT nm STRONG COVALENT BONDING -- strength and stability of graphite -- no surface states (less scattering, compatibility with many insulators) HIGH THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY -- almost as high as diamond (dense circuits) SELF-ASSEMBLY -- biological, recognition-based assembly

5 Self-assembly of DNA-templated CNFETs K.Keren et al., Technion.

6 Self-assembly of DNA-templated CNFETs K.Keren et al., Technion.

7 CLOSED COAXIAL NANOTUBE FET STRUCTURE
chirality: (16,0) radius: 0.62 nm bandgap: 0.63 eV length: nm oxide thickness: (RG-RT): nm

8 MODE CONSTRICTION and TRANSMISSION E T kz CNT (few modes) kx
Doubly degenerate lowest mode T CNT (few modes) Interfacial G: even when transport is ballistic in CNT METAL (many modes) 155 S for M=2

9 CURRENT in 1-D SYSTEMS The Landauer current

10 General non-equilibrium case
1D DOS E f(E) EFS 0.5 E f(E) EFD 0.5 Non-equilib f(E-EC,z) Q(z,E)=qf(E-EC,z)g(E-EC,z) Solve: 1. Self-consistent SP 2. Compact model

11 Quantum-mechanical treatment
Need full QM treatment to compute: -- Q(z) within barrier regions -- Q in evanescent states (MIGS) -- resonance, coherence -- S  D tunneling. Quantum-mechanical treatment Emid

12 Transmission Probability TS Comparison
SP CM2 CM1 VGS=VDS=0.4 V Emid D.L. John et al., Nanotech04, March 2004

13 Drain I-V Comparison CM1 VGS=0.4V CM2 SP
L.C. Castro et al., Nanotechnology, submitted.

14 I-V dependence on S,D workfunction
Negative barrier (p-type) device Positive barrier (p-type) device VGS = -0.4 V D.L. John et al., Nanotech04, March 2004

15 gate Cins Q insulator Quantum Capacitance CQ nanotube source

16 "Quantum" Capacitance in CN
VDS=0 VDS=0.2V Band 1 Band 2 D.L. John et al., JAP, submitted.

17 Transconductance: the Ultimate Limit
f(E) EFS 0.5 EFD EC

18 CONCLUSIONS CNs have excellent thermal and mechanical properties.
CNFETs can be self-assembled via biological recognition. QMR is important in negative-barrier SB-CNFETs. High DC currents and transconductances are feasible. Capacitance is not quantized. CNFETs deserve serious study as molecular transistors.


Download ppt "Performance Predictions for Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google