Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Reston, September 19 2000 doi> DOI Workshop: Future plans and progress.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Reston, September 19 2000 doi> DOI Workshop: Future plans and progress."— Presentation transcript:

1 Reston, September doi> DOI Workshop: Future plans and progress

2 2 First workshop since full implementation 37 people registered IDF members, prefix holders, others Flexible agenda, open discussion Metadata issues and DOI

3 3 See for DOI Handbook CD ROM (in folder) IDF Annual Report 2000 Indecs document (re metadata framework) Further information Documents

4 4 Also available here for consultation : DOI Handbook (printed) Metadata background: BioImage, ONIX, EPICS Recent articles etc all available (or linked) from Documents

5 5 DOI update /overview - break - Metadata issues: designing DOI genres - lunch - Resolution issues - break - Deployment issues Whats needed; how to proceed; prototypes and practical next steps Agenda

6 6 What has been achieved? Where are we heading? DOI: Review of progress

7 7 Consistency: no major U turns Progress: design and implementation Engagement: wider and deeper –metadata discussions –identifier issues Development and Product –The road ahead analogy DOI: Review of progress

8 8 Standards tracking Standards tracking Full implementation Full implementation Initial implementation Initial implementation Single redirection Metadata W3C, WIPO, NISO, ISO, etc, other initiatives Multiple resolution A continuing development activity DOI: development in three tracks

9 9 Components of the DOI DOI: Review of progress

10 10 A number (or name) –assign a number to something –(compare: telephone number)

11 11 A number (or name) –assign a number to something –(compare: telephone number) A description –what the number is assigned to –(compare: directory entry)

12 12 A number (or name) –assign a number to something –(compare: telephone number) A description –what the number is assigned to –(compare: directory entry) An action –make the number do something –(compare: the telephone system)

13 13 A number (or name) –assign a number to something –(compare: telephone number) A description –what the number is assigned to –(compare: directory entry) An action –make the number do something –(compare: the telephone system) Policies –how to get a phone number; billing (compare: social structures)

14 14 POLICIES Syntax /5678 NUMBERING DESCRIPTION Metadata Pieces of data which describe uniquely that which is identified Resolution System able to link the number to something useful ACTION

15 15 Syntax /5678 NUMBERING DESCRIPTION Metadata Pieces of data which describe uniquely that which is identified Resolution System able to link the number to something useful ACTION

16 16 Syntax /5678 NUMBERING Resolution System able to link the number to something useful ACTION

17 17 Syntax /5678 NUMBERING Resolution Link to one URL only ACTION

18 18 POLICIES Any form of identifier ENUMERATION DESCRIPTION framework: DOI can describe any form of intellectual property, at any level of granularity RESOLUTION Handle System allows a DOI to link to any and multiple pieces of current data doi>

19 19 An extensible infrastructure, architecture –a firm basis for building consistent, reliable, systems More members, more prefixes, more DOIs DOI: Review of progress

20 20 a major implementation other implementations near more signs of influence: –W3C; ISTC; E-Books clear vision: conceptual integrity (Brookes) DOI: Review of progress

21 21 STM Rigorous approach Technical Anglo-American Key individuals Open development Unifying Advantages: and potential pitfalls too identified with text,STM? theoretical? not understandable? not international? in depth support? not yet ready? fragmentation?

22 22 If this stuff wasnt difficult we wouldnt be doing it The first actionable identifier (all the components) Oct 1997 concept launched (simple form) March 1998 IDF launched; two years of work Some comparisons: –URN (1991 -); DC (1994-); FRBR ( ); HDL (1994-); W3C (1994-); IMS (1996-); RosettaNet (1998-) DOI: Time frame

23 23 Crossref (PILA) –Crossref is the first practical demonstration of why the DOI is important, and how it can be used to improve Web publishing. Though it was implemented by journal publishers…the concept could be applied to other genres… (Seybold Report, 14 June) –see IDF E-Citations paper Images –BioImage; and extension? DOI: Applications

24 24 E-Books - working with: ONIX/EPICS; OEB; EBX and AAP E-Books standards activity - community is diffuse and hence applications as yet undefined: eBooks (ISBN?); components; links? Instructional materials (NICEM) Music industry Others? E-News; Legal information; Patents; Grey literature; etc. Applications will drive deployment DOI: Applications (cont.)

25 25 approach vindicated –See recent papers by Carl Lagoze; Priscilla Caplan practical implementation of through ONIX/EPICS dictionary –extension/collaboration with other areas e.g.music/video; SMPTE; MerchEnt; etc documentation in detail: –Handbook (section 5, and appendices 2&5) –More detailed template for genres coming shortly mechanism for metadata (e.g. 123…) –XML declarations; schemas DOI: Applications and metadata

26 26 Technology is (relatively) easy Basis for Deployment outlined (end of 1999) Initial financial model (June): simple First and second wave of interested parties Terms document Applications will drive deployment (genres etc) Commercial implementation: deployment

27 27 more on this in next session rights transactions see latest indecs framework document role of XrML to be investigated DOI-R proposed by analogy to DOI-X scope problems now looking at more defined prototype with FBF Rights is not just another application Extensibility: metadata framework

28 28 Digital Object Architecture includes Handle, repositories, etc. –see papers by Kahn et al * multiple resolution workflow tools repository: –stated operations = DOI services? –genre definitions, schema, etc? public key infrastructure Extensibility: Digital Object Architecture

29 29 Review 1999: –DOI Current Status and Outlook May 1999 Review 2000 Handbook (DOI /182) Papers –DOI: implementing a standard …. –one to many –etc Documentation

30 30 W3C approach up to now: –dont promise what cant deliver; show by example CD-ROM marks start of next wave –outreach and applications Marketing

31 31 Handle: –New release of second major version –Handle infrastructure improved –CNRI plans for Handle –Browser support: Mozilla, IE? Metadata, rights: –ONIX/EPICS etc implementing indecs –XrML W3C: – URI Activity –intellectual property on the web workshop Other key activities

32 32 Other intellectual property activities: –e.g. MPEG-21 as possible focus for cIDF, SMPTE, etc. Legacy identifiers (ISBN, ISSN, etc) –common issues for identifiers Work with new identifiers (e.g. ISTC; E- books) Major issue: mindshare support for standards: avoid fragmentation Other key activities (2)

33 33 Workshops Prototypes New working groups (E mail lists) proposed: –Handle/resolution –Identifiers/metadata –Information interchange Community involvement

34 34 genres: articulation and development –metadata declarations multiple resolution: services –e.g. (YBP, 1998) –e.g * Services will drive applications rights * Rights services will drive killer apps outreach to i.p. communities commonality of identifier/ metadata/ i.p.issues communities The future

35 35 To be investigated: Metadata pointer for all DOIs (kernel) XML schema for genre metadata List of other desired services and policies Registry of data types = service (and tools) Registry of genres Tools to make all this easier Multiple resolution: services

36 36 Consistency: no major U turns Progress: development and implementation Conceptual integrity Practical results; and development More to be done on advocacy More to be done on applications, developments - this workshop DOI: Review of progress


Download ppt "Reston, September 19 2000 doi> DOI Workshop: Future plans and progress."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google