Presentation on theme: "The Constitution and the fight for ratification"— Presentation transcript:
1The Constitution and the fight for ratification The Logic of American PoliticsChapter Two: The Constitution
2Review Theory and tools Specifics: the founding of the country Delegation – its advantages and potential disadvantagesMajority rule and representative government as an attempt to strike a good balance between transaction and conformity costs.Specifics: the founding of the countryWhy declare independence?A new balance of costs – raising transaction costs to minimize conformity costsFree rider problems in the war effortStruggles after independenceThe need for a new system of government
3Two Competing Plans Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Representation in legislature based on a state’s population.Representation equal among states.Unitary executivePlural executive
4Stalemate over Plans Weeks of debate. Key sticking point – basis of representation.Sent to committee to resolve.
5The Great Compromise Written by Roger Sherman of Connecticut A 2 chamber legislatureLower chamber – The House of Representatives. Elected by the people. Apportioned on the basis of population.Upper chamber – The Senate. Selected by state legislatures. Equal representation from each state (two Senators per state).
6Separation of PowerThe compromise accepted, Madison turns his attention to checks and balances and separation of power.Idea comes from French philosopher Montesquieu who argued that government’s power could be effectively limited by having separate legislative, executive and judicial branches of government.
7Separation of powers Separation of powers Executive branch – President Legislative branch – Congress – House and SenateJudicial Branch – Supreme Court (and federal courts)
8Designing the Executive Many of the founders were afraid of executive power, especially when held by a single individual.One of the most debated issues at the Constitutional Convention despite widespread agreement that George Washington would be the first president.Proposals ranged from Alexander Hamilton’s single, powerful executive elected for life to a plural executive selected by the legislature for short time periods with very limited power.
9Designing the Judiciary Objects of debate:Who would appoint Supreme Court justices – the president or the Senate?Should a network of lower federal courts be created or should state courts handle all cases until they reach the federal Supreme Court?
10The Issue of SlaveryLater in the convention some southern delegates insisted on 2 guarantees for their “peculiar institution” as conditions for remaining at the convention and endorsing its result:Unrestricted right to continue importing slavesReturn of runaway slaves in northern statesResult: Assurance that importing slaves would not be banned before 1808 and agreement to return runaway slaves.
11The Issue of SlaveryWhy did the more numerous northern delegates give in to the southern ones?Need to get the Constitution passedSouth threatening to defect if demands weren’t reachedNew England states got something they wanted in returnA “logroll” occurred – the South dropped its opposition to commercial issues important to New England such as the ability of Congress to raise taxes on imports with a simple majority vote
12Amending the Constitution The Articles of Confederation had required unanimous consent to amend them.Amendment procedure adopted can be seen as an effort to balance transaction and conformity costs.Also a compromise between nationalists and states’ rights delegates.
14Adopting the Constitution Article VII provided the procedureMust be adopted by the conventions of 9 of the statesEliminated unanimous consent required under Articles of Confederation.Withdrew authority for approval from state legislatures who might be reluctant to agree.
15The Fight for Ratification 3 of the delegates at the convention refused to sign the Constitution – Edmund Randolph, Elbridge Gerry and George MasonSome prominent political leaders had refused to participate in the first place
16The Constitution as Object of Debate Debate was not limited to the state conventionsTwo groupsThe FederalistsThe Antifederalists
17The AntifederalistsIncluded Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, George Mason, James Monroe, Samuel Adams and George ClintonOpposed the Constitution
18The Antifederalists A more heterogeneous group than the federalists United by opposition to Constitution but not in support of an alternativeWritings appeared in newspapers and circulated in pamphlets
19The AntifederalistsGot stuck with the name Anti-federalists when their better organized opponents took the name federalistsSaw themselves as the true federalists because they ascribed to the principles of federalism set forth in the Articles of ConfederationPreferred a decentralized federal system of government with the states above the national governmentPro-states’ rights
20The AntifederalistsRecognized some need for change but by and large defended the status quoThought that the Philadelphia convention had overstepped its bounds
21The AntifederalistsAfraid the national government would usurp the power of the statesThought the Constitution had aristocratic tendenciesNew governmental system too complex
22The Antifederalists Not opposed to union Thought that true democracy only works in small, homogenous republicsSaw the United States as too large and diverse to be under a single set of laws
23The AntifederalistsThought there needed to be explicit safeguards against tyrannyCalled for a bill of rights to be a part of the Constitution
24The Federalists The Federalist Papers Originally published in New York newspapers under the pen name PubliusWritten by 3 men – John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison
25The Federalist Papers 85 essays Jay wrote 5Hamilton wrote the mostMadison wrote the most famous and arguably the bestProvide insight into the intent of those who wrote the Constitution
26The Federalists Nationalists Pro-federation not necessarily pro-federalismActively supported the Constitution and argued for its ratification
27The FederalistsTwo of the most famous Federalist papers are #10 and #51Both were written by James MadisonFocuses on the fundamental problem of self-governance
28Federalist No. 10Madison explores the likelihood that a tyranny of the majority would arise in a democracy and identifies a solution.Goal: to design a republic so the majority can’t tyrannize the minority
29Federalist No. 10Responds to the strongest argument of the Antifederalists -- that a “large Republic” cannot long survive.Discusses the negatives of faction defined as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.”
30Federalist No. 10 Madison identifies two ways to eliminate factions authoritarianism – worse than the diseaseconformism – impracticalSo if the causes of factions cannot be removed, then one must control their effects
31Federalist No. 10 Two kinds of factions MinorityMajorityArgues that minority factions are not a threat in a democracy.
32Federalist No. 10A direct democracy would allow the majority to tyrannize the minoritySolution – representative government
33Federalist No. 10How representative government prevents majority tyranny:Dilutes factious spirit – to get elected have to appeal to a diverse constituency
34Federalist No. 10 Bigger is better Turns the antifederalist argument that small republics are better on its head. Instead, Madison says small is dangerous.A large population and territory makes it harder for potential tyrannical majorities to arise and to collude against a minority interest
35Federalist No. 51Argues that the system is designed to avoid usurpation of powerBy separating government officers into different branches (separation of powers) and giving them the authority to interfere with each other’s actions (checks and balances) they could defend the integrity of their offices.
36Checks and Balances – shared power Examples:Congress passes laws but the president can veto and the court can declare them unconstitutionalPresidents appoint but the Senate must confirmCongress can impeach and remove the president and federal judges
37Federalist No. 51Solving the delegation problem – keeping agents honestAmbition is made to counteract ambition…
38The Federalist PapersMadison probably didn’t agree with everything he wroteHelped convince those undecided about the Constitution that the system would not give rise to a tyrannical government
39The Road to Ratification December 7, 1787 Delaware ratifies 30-0December 12, 1781 Pennsylvania ratifies 46-23December 18, 1787 New Jersey ratifiesDecember 31, 1787 Georgia ratifies 26-0January 9, 1788 Connecticut ratifiesFebruary 6, Massachusetts ratifiesApril 26, 1788 Maryland ratifies 63-11May 23, 1788 South Carolina ratifiesJune 21, 1788 New Hampshire ratifies 57-47
40The Road to Ratification With the New Hampshire vote, the Constitution officially took effect.But without New York and Virginia, two large and centrally located states, the new government wasn’t given much of a chance.
41The Road to Ratification June 25, 1788 Virginia ratifies 89-79July 26, 1788 New York ratifies 30-27November 21, 1788 North Carolina ratifiesMay 29, 1790 Rhode Island ratifies 34-32
42An Antifederalist Legacy: the Bill of Rights Madison had agreed to write one and introduce it at the first congress to help get the Constitution ratifiedBill of Rights introduced in Congress September 9, 1788.December 15, 1791 Bill of Rights ratified and becomes part of the Constitution
43The Federal System The Logic of American Politics Chapter Three: Federalism
44FederalismFederalism is a hybrid system mixing elements of a confederation where lower level governments possess all real authority and unitary government in which national government has a monopoly on constitutional authority.
46American-style federalism In a federal system, authority is divided between two or more distinct levels of government.In the United States, the division is between the national (federal) government and the statesBefore adopting a federal system in the Constitution, the nation had experienced unitary government while under British rule and a confederation under the Articles of Confederation.
47Characteristics of Federal Systems A government must have constitutional relations across levels and interactions that satisfy three general conditions:The same people and territory are included in both levels of government.The nation’s constitution protects units at each level of government from encroachment by the other units.Each unit is in a position to exert some leverage over the other.
48The Federal System in the U.S. Some people consider the U.S. federal system to have 3 levels but that is not accurate.National and state government have a federal relationship.State and local government have a unitary relationship.Local governments are established by the states and operate under state authority. They do not have independent constitutional authority.
49Review Fundamentals and logic of United States’ institutional design Limiting powerThe role of compromiseIntroduction to federalism