Presentation on theme: "Marxist Theory and International Conflict and Security"— Presentation transcript:
1 Marxist Theory and International Conflict and Security Why include Marxist theory as a valid theory of international security when it has proved a failure?Soviet Union, a Marxist model states, organized as a centralized political and economic system, self-destructedThe Chinese Communist state abandoned the Maoist model of Marxist central political and economic control, in favor of a market economic system, linked to global markets around the globe, and Chinese membership in the World Trade Organization.
2 Two Forces Underlying Marxist Theory Qualify Marxism as a Theory of International Security First, the Marxist prediction that capitalism and capitalist markets will distribute wealth and income unequally will be a constant source of conflictSecond, Marxism, viewed as a political ideology, has mobilized the populations around the globe under European imperial rule to revolt and create their own statesMarxism as an ideology is still strong, notably once again justifying the centralization of political and economic power: e.g. Venezuela and Cuba and to a lesser extent in Bolivia, EcuadorMany critics of globalization also rely on Marxist ideology to justify their opposition to global capitalistic markets and corporate power
3 What Are Key Concepts of Marxism As a Theory of International Conflict and Security? Realists and Liberal Institutionalists identify the state as the principal actor in international relations and global politicsLiberal theorists identify the individual as the principal actor and source of political and economic legitimacy of state and markets systemsBut Marxism identifies the creation of classes as the principal actor in international relations
4 How Does Marxism Arrive at Class Struggle as the Central Actors in International Relations? 1) Marx and Marxists state that humans are fundamentally material entitiesFrederick Engels: “Mankind must first off eat, drink, have shelter and clothing before it can pursue politics, science, and religion”2) The modes of production to meet human material needs creates a power structure that rules humans who depend on this production systemUnder feudalism (European and Japanese), agriculture was the dominant mode of production of wealthThose who owned land controlled the workers and serfs that were the labor for agriculture which they exploitedThey also controlled political authorities and military forces to impose their rule on others
5 The Industrial Revolution and Capitalist Destroys Feudalism 3) The Industrial Revolution and global capital markets that facilitate mass production and economies of scale create a capitalist class, opposed to feudal land ownersCapitalists and corporations which own and control the means of industrial production capture most of the wealth of the capitalist systemWorkers are exploited by being paid low or subsistence wagesTraditional home industries, like Indian cotton manufacture, are destroyedThe state and its military and police forces are controlled by capitalists and corporationsThus, the struggle between a capitalist class and a worker or proletariat class is what is “real” about international politics, not the state (realists) or individuals (liberals)
6 Marxism and the Cold War Marxism as ideology helps explain the Russian and Chinese revolutionsA socialist state and economy claimed to end the alleged injustices (unequal power and wealth to capitalists) and to be a superior system for the production and equitable distribution of wealthThe state seized the private land and destroyed the landowner classCollective farms were were created as the foundation of a socialist state and society
7 Marxism and the End of Europe’s Empires Marxist doctrine of exploitation by the West and capitalism rationalized the revolt of the developing worldThe Soviet Union and Communist China aligned with these movements for self-determination in their struggle with the West and, especially, with the United States
8 Marxism and the Cold War The socialist model that combined political and economic power in the state proved fatal to the Soviet UnionChina abandoned the Maoist socialist state both on political and economic groundsThe cultural revolution was directed at the elites of the Communist partyThe state controlled economic system produced famine and massive economic dislocation and losses
9 Marxism and Identity Politics Marxism is not able to explainWhy the peoples of the developing world created their own states instead of joining a global socialist orderWhy the Soviet Union was destroyed byThe demand of its East European satellites for national self-determinationThe demand of Russian elites to abandon a socialist system that impoverished the Soviet UnionThe demand of the peoples of the Soviet Republics for self-determination and their own state
10 Can Marxism Still Explain Conflict? The unequal distribution of wealth through globalization and global markets within and between states remains a flaw within the global system and a source of conflictThe ideology of Marxism, based on the unequal distribution of economic wealth and political power as the product of capitalism, has created a backlash against global markets and the power of the Western liberal market democraciesMarxist theory still has some explanatory power along these two dimensions of inequality and ideology.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.