Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Constitutional compromise The negotiation of a mixed constitution designed to contain democracy, 1787-1789.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Constitutional compromise The negotiation of a mixed constitution designed to contain democracy, 1787-1789."— Presentation transcript:

1 Constitutional compromise The negotiation of a mixed constitution designed to contain democracy, 1787-1789

2 The issue of representation led to the Great Compromise. Virginia Plan gave larger states more representation because it was based on population. New Jersey Plan gave smaller states equal representation with larger states. Great Compromise resolved issue with a two-house legislature ( see p 165). An upper house—the Senate—provided for two representatives from each state. A lower house—the House of Representatives—provided for representation based on state population.

3 The South The North Wanted slaves to be counted as part of their population Wanted slaves counted only to determine taxes but not for representation Regional debate over slavery led to the Three-Fifths Compromise. Three-Fifths Compromise Resolved differences by counting each slave as three- fifths of a person

4 The U.S. Constitution created federalism and a balance of power. Ensured popular sovereignty: idea that political authority resided in the people Provided for federalism: division of power between states and federal government Required states to obey authority of the federal government Gave states control over functions not assigned to the federal government See p. 201

5 Constitution designed to divide and balance power among three branches of government. See pp 183-184. See Legislative branch to make the laws Executive branch to carry out the laws Judicial branch to interpret the laws Separation of Power & Checks and Balances System of checks and balances keeps branches from becoming too powerful. Congress has power to pass bills into law. President can veto laws passed. Supreme Court can strike down unconstitutional laws.

6 Federalists and Antifederalists engaged in debate over the new Constitution. (See pp 170-173 for more background) Federalists Supported Constitution Desired strong central government Liked balance of powers in Constitution; mixed monarchic, oligarchic and democratic forms Made speeches and pamphlets advocating change in government against “tyranny of the majority” Antifederalists Opposed Constitution Feared central government would be too powerful Concerned about lack of guarantee of individual rights, demanded bill of rights George Mason became Antifederalist over rights issue Made Speeches and published arguments against “dangerously oligarchic” constitution.


Download ppt "Constitutional compromise The negotiation of a mixed constitution designed to contain democracy, 1787-1789."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google