1. Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta Mon. 16 th – Fri. 20 th November, 2015

2. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 1DLR1.1 Establishment of the Running of CEADESE Office Office Accomodation and Staff Administrative tools 100% Functional office. Administrative and Academic Staff - DLR 1.2 Coordination Meetings Number of Meeting held 100% 16 Coordination Meetings held - DLR 1.3 World Bank Meeting / Workshops Regular attendance at World Bank / AAU Meeting 100% 4 meetings attended - Status of Implementation of Activities

3. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLIDLR1.4 Technical / Management Training Number of Staff Trained 10% Fiducial Training of 2 Centre staff Financial Constraints DLR 1.6 Development of Website Functional website 100% Website up and Running - DLR 1.7 Industrial Relations MoUs signed 13% 2 MoUs Legal issues delaying MoU. Causing delay Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

4. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 1DLR 1.8 Internal and External M & E Number Result Frame work submitted 100% 2 Result Framework submitted - DLI 2DLR 2.1 Masters Student a.) No Masters curriculum Developed or Revised 100% 1.) 28 Masters (4 Regional). 2.) 2 New curriculum Developed for 6 programmes 3.) Curriculum Revised into 5 programmes - Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

5. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 2DLR 2.2 PhD students a.) No PhD b.) Curriculum Developed 100% 1.) 37 PhD (3 regional) 2.) New curriculum Developed for 5 Programmes. 3.) Curriculum Revised into 5 programmes - DLR 2.3 Short-term courses for students No of Participants 0% Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

6. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 2DLR 2.4 Outreach periods (Faculty and Students) No. of student completing at least 4 weeks of internship 100%1.65 students on internship 2.) 65 Faculties on Supervision - DLR 2.5 Accreditation 1.Internal Accreditation (Mock) 2.NUC Resource Verification 0% 1.Delay in funding 2.NUC has no benchmark Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

7. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 2DLR 2.6 Research Publications No. of papers published 0% Students’ Research yet to start DLR 2.7 Externally Generated Revenue Amount of Revenue generated 100% N10,250,000 $52,030.50 DLR 2.8 Improved Teaching & Learning Environment No. of Faculties upgraded/renov ated/provided. Hostel/Creche/ Book/Cleaning 0%0Funding Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

8. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 3DLR 3.1 Timely withdrawal application No. of timely withdrawal 100%1 timely withdrawal application for 1st dis- bursement Preparing Interim financial Report for December, 2015 DLR 3.2 Functional University Audit Committee No. of Reports 0%0 No meeting yet?? Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

9. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 3DLR 3.3 Functional internal audit No. of Reports 100% Several reports - DLR 3.4 Web transparency on financial management Timely and full disbursement in website. -0 Awaiting for external audit report Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

10. DLI PLANNED ACTIVITY EXPECTED RESULTS % ACTIVITY COMPLETED TO-DATE RESULT OBTAINED REMARKS: EXPLANATION DLI 4DLR 4.1 Third party Procurement Verification 1.) Procurement Plan 2.) Appointed procurement Consultant. 3.) No. of Procurements verified 1. 100% 2. 0% 3. 0% 1.) Plan approved Funding delay DLR 4.2 Timeliness of Procurement Process 1.) Procurement Plan 2.) No. of Procurements completed as scheduled on Plan 1.100% 2.0% 1.) Plan approved Funding delay Status of Implementation of Activities – Cont’d

12. Date and Period of Reporting: May 2015 – November, 2015 IssuesComments Did you undertake a kick off meeting with all partners? Yes, in the form of stakeholders meeting Were stakeholders included in kick off meeting? YES

13. Are coordination, management and financing arrangements clearly defined and do they support institutional strengthening and local ownership? Depending on the role of the partner in the project. Institutional partners for lectures and supervision Industry partners internship & supervision What reporting arrangements are in place between you and the partners? Partners coordinators report to Programme Leader Director. Academic Board / Management Board.

14. What monitoring arrangements are in place/envisaged? Role for M & E What management tool are you using, if any? Does it incorporate the activity section of the IP? Does it constantly relate and reflect the DLIs Regular meeting of Board

15. Is the timescale and/or range of activities realistic? Do you think a review is necessary? Not often realistic especially procurements. A review is necessary To what extent are activities implemented as scheduled? If there are delays how are they rectified? For academic activities – Yes

16. Are funds committed and spent in line with the implementation plan? Are there any variations? What are the reasons? Yes. The Accounting software is rigid on pre budgeted amount. However when it come to spending on research – variation Have all planned outputs been delivered to date? And in a logic sequence? Academic activities – Yes Procurement – No Have the planned results to date been achieved? Academic – Yes

17. Are the DLIs/results appropriate and are they being reported against? The DLIs are appropriate and reported against Have all planned target groups access to / using project results/services available so far? Target groups have access. No project results yet. Our students are designing their research to solve problems

18. Are there any factors which prevent target groups accessing the results/services? None If appropriate, how flexible is the project in adapting to changing needs/circumstances? Not very flexible in terms of financial commitments